ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 August 2020, 11:59 PM | #31 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,749
|
Good points. I agree.
|
19 August 2020, 03:54 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Southeast
Posts: 414
|
Two Beauties
Quote:
|
|
19 August 2020, 04:18 AM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,043
|
As much as i like Seiko, the finishing on my former sla033 and sla025 were a notch below. Just picked up a quartz GD SBGN009 and the quality IMHO seems like a step up even though it is a lower MSRP. The sla025 did seem like it was a bit better than the Willard but neither to me were anything to write home about. I think the diver grand Seiko bracelets are a bit clunky but don't mind their dressier line bracelets. having 2 0.6 size links is genius. I also felt the 116610 seems a lot sturdier than the older 16610.
|
25 August 2020, 10:07 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Louisiana, USA
Watch: 116710LN, 16800
Posts: 348
|
Appreciate all the replies. Pulled the trigger on an SLA033 today. Hopefully here on Wednesday, along with a hurricane or two.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
25 August 2020, 05:47 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,246
|
|
31 August 2020, 02:54 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
I have to agree. I own 2 Rolex, my wife owns 2 as well. No need to say they are awesome timepieces hence their success (and awesome marketing I guess). Nevertheless my Snowflake not only stands the comparisons it is better. Only the bracelet maybe stands in between the one of my 16710 and the newest one of my SD4000. The clasp especially would benefit a little more engineering and “looks”. But anyways it will end up on a strap soon and there the clasp are A+.
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
|
2 September 2020, 08:01 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Gerry
Location: USA
Watch: Exp1 Mk2
Posts: 160
|
SLA033 Capt. Willard.
Ok, I bought this for 25% less than retail from an original owner. At first, I thought who'd pay like $3K for this watch used?
Well, I have an older Sub and even if I had a new one this watch is the equal of a Rolex at twice the price. It's first-rate in every way. Fit/Finish is superb. The GS caliber is a real bonus and the fact that it was made in the GS factory doesn't surprise me at the attention to detail. Great watch, worth every penny but it's also the type of watch that YOU have to enjoy because no one is going to recognize the watch except those of us who are a bit "off" on these things. G. Quote:
|
|
6 September 2020, 03:23 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
I am a new happy owner of a Snowflake.
I am also lucky to own a 5 digits gmt master 2 (my first expensive watch) and a SD4k. Rolex are obviously great watches. But quality, precision and details are on another level on the GS. The bracelet of the GS is in between the 2 Rolex. Better than the GMT not as « crisp » as the SeaDweller. My next purchase will most probably a dress GS. I enjoy my watch collection very much. But the recent years hype and attention that the Rolex are getting is actually making me wearing them less.
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
15 May 2021, 11:39 AM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
16 May 2021, 01:05 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: here AND there...
Posts: 2,240
|
there really isn't a great comparison between the two, but BOTH PIECES offer something special.
At it's core, the Rolex is much more of a 'highend' good than the zero three three, but the Seiko is magnificent stylistically. The SLA033 has the vintage vibe down to the millimeter and the 'SLA' line is made in the Grand Seiko facilities (as opposed to the seiko watch factory) with all that that encompasses including the highest level of hand finishing. |
20 May 2021, 01:18 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Cam
Location: North of 49th
Watch: Rolex/Grand Seiko
Posts: 1,687
|
I have been a Rolex lover for many years and have a nice little collection. I fell into Grand Seiko somewhat arbitrarily. To get my newest edition 228235 DD, I bundled it with a GS SBGK002, the beautiful Suki-Urushi dial model. This was not heat-of-the-moment decision, as I looked at the watch a month before. Never really paying attention to GS, I was somewhat surprised at the price tag. After doing some research, I had an entirely new appreciation of the watch and the brand in general. Understanding that used models of this particular watch sell for substantially less (60%) and there is even a new model on Chrono out of Japan for 75% of cost, I took the bundle with the DD at MSRP.
This watch is truly amazing up close, and knowing how the artisans (I won't call them simply watchmakers) put together such a fine piece, including the multiple straining of the lacquer, the painstaking application of the lacquer to the dial, the hand painted numerals, hour markers and even the GS logo (in platinum), and the amazing polish of the rose gold case. This isn't even delving into the spectacular movement (spring drive no less) with a power reserve equal to the new Rolexes. To be honest, I'm not sure I want to wear it as it is more akin to a masterful piece of art (to me) than simply a nice watch. I can't compare it to any of my Rolexes. Totally different. But I will never say that GS can't compete with the big boys. I no longer consider Rolexes "tool watches" even though they can be. My true tool watches are a Seiko kintetic-drive that I bought for $200 (fully wound can stay running over 2 weeks!) and a solar Seiko which I bought for $250 which hasn't stopped running since I purchased it four years ago.
__________________
16618 126710BLRO 116500 LN (White) 228235 228239 SBGK002 |
20 May 2021, 03:25 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 667
|
I am late to the party, but have owned most sub variations from vintage to last generation of ceramic. I now have the SLA033 and a 3861 Speedmaster. My opinion is that i love this combination, and got my speedmaster brand new, and the SLA033 for just under 3k pre-owned in mint condition all papers, box, etc. As far as I am concerned the SLA033 is just as good as any sub/seadweller i have owned. I am not saying it s better, or worse, but, just as good. It is a different style and case, but, beautiful to look at and wears great. You cannot go wrong with it. What a value!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.