The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 October 2020, 12:14 PM   #31
El Patron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 159
My 1st watch was a Movado Valor Tungsten Carbide Watch. I used that watch out in the field as a technician. I beat the crap out that watch, still looks like new and has a really nice weight to it, i wish Rolex would use this in their professional watches.
El Patron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 12:17 PM   #32
brandog
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 370
Oystersteel. Titanium has no luster and looks dull. You also cant polish titanium back to a nice finish after years of wear like oystersteel.
brandog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 12:24 PM   #33
thenewrick
"TRF" Member
 
thenewrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: FL
Watch: OP41 Silver
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandog View Post
Oystersteel. Titanium has no luster and looks dull. You also cant polish titanium back to a nice finish after years of wear like oystersteel.
Depends on the titanium. Grand Seikos can be zaratsu polished during a service for an extra fee. It's a more premium product and costs more to service.
thenewrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 01:08 PM   #34
Smobews
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Usa
Watch: The BIG ones
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandog View Post
Oystersteel. Titanium has no luster and looks dull. You also cant polish titanium back to a nice finish after years of wear like oystersteel.
Not true. My seven year old titanium Omega PO came back from a service looking brand new. You need to see a grade 5 titanium watch in person; polished surfaces have plenty of luster and contrast the brushed surfaces beautifully.
Smobews is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 01:19 PM   #35
zengineer
"TRF" Member
 
zengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandog View Post
Oystersteel. Titanium has no luster and looks dull. You also cant polish titanium back to a nice finish after years of wear like oystersteel.
Errr, my SBGR disagrees (pic from the net). My Seamaster is "dull" but I like the unique look. There are all sorts of ways to be Titanium.

Sent from my SM-T830 using Tapatalk
zengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 02:33 PM   #36
rolexjackson
2024 Pledge Member
 
rolexjackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Real Name: Jackson
Location: USA
Watch: Sub, GMT, Daytona
Posts: 2,210
Ti is lighter than steel, I see the biggest trade off is that ti can be brittle. I had a ti bracelet shatter once from a knock on the kitchen counter edge. I’ve been leery of it ever since.
rolexjackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 02:47 PM   #37
ndrs63
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,101
I don’t like titanium because it does not have the heft one would expect from a time piece, plus it will never shine like the oystersteel


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ndrs63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 07:44 PM   #38
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,815
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewrick View Post
I’ve seen some deep discussions on titanium in grand Seiko forums.

Titanium is just a base metal and the alloys are what’s important. Other watchmakers use oystersteel also it’s just a marketing term. Seiko uses multiple titanium alloys based on price point. Highest end titanium is more scratch resistant than steel. It’s lighter and people say it feels cheap because of the weight.

Titanium alloys can also attract fingerprints and scratches might not as easy to ignore and polish out.

It all depends in the end. I’d like to try titanium as I think I’d prefer a lighter watch.
Oystersteel may not be a marketing term.
And it may very well be a proprietry name for a material that's defined by a particularly stringent acceptance criterior that upon casual observation appears to be something similar.
At this juncture, only Rolex knows.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:20 PM   #39
JSolution
"TRF" Member
 
JSolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Jay
Location: England
Watch: SkyD
Posts: 6,232
Tried on the Pelagos recently, liked it in pictures but too light for me didn’t like the feel of it at all. But I am used to heavier watches ;)
JSolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:47 PM   #40
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
I've not seen many Ti watches with finishes that I like. I know it can be done but in general I like the Fe alloys much better!!!
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 08:53 PM   #41
Harry-57
2024 Pledge Member
 
Harry-57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Harry
Location: England
Posts: 9,674
I have a Titanium Speedmaster. It's light. Unfortunately it doesn't wear comfortably. Swings and roundabouts.

Like many things, you won't know until you have the specific watch on your own wrist. Past that there are too many variables.
Harry-57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2020, 09:02 PM   #42
Where
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Waitlist
Watch: Rolex & Omega
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
Oystersteel may not be a marketing term.
And it may very well be a proprietry name for a material that's defined by a particularly stringent acceptance criterior that upon casual observation appears to be something similar.
At this juncture, only Rolex knows.
It's 904L steel. We're not getting anything more than that, it's just marketing by Rolex. Steel is a nice entry-level material, but well-finished Titanium is premium. It's stronger, lighter, and more scratch resistant than steel. It would be great if Rolex made a titanium watch, but unfortunately it doesn't align with their design philosophy.
Where is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2020, 05:08 PM   #43
HiDive
"TRF" Member
 
HiDive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Vincent
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Seadweller50
Posts: 362
Service

Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewrick View Post
Depends on the titanium. Grand Seikos can be zaratsu polished during a service for an extra fee. It's a more premium product and costs more to service.
Actually, my Grand Seiko spring drive cost less than a Rolex to service. It took longer because it had to go to Japan and a relatively small number of technicians are allowed to work on them.

The polished parts on it on it are every bit as lusterous as the soft 904L SS or 316L used in Rolex or other high end sports watches.
HiDive is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.