|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 February 2008, 03:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 282
|
Fake GMT Master II Review on Youtube?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76RAJWQoosE
Anyone think the cyclops magnification is not the 2.5X spec for sure. Your thoughts? |
|
|
|
29 February 2008, 04:28 PM
|
#2 |
|
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
I've seen this report many times and christian cantrell seems to be a serious guy
I think that the date magnification seems low because the camera is recording from too close. The time maginification looks small to me too when i look at the watch from too close
__________________
 GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
|
|
|
29 February 2008, 04:36 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,918
|
Not fake.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
1 March 2008, 12:39 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I'd agree. It looks fine to me.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
|
|
|
1 March 2008, 09:42 AM
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 282
|
I thought the magnification isn't 2.5X like I have seen in other examples.
Oh well, I learned something. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
