ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

direwolf · 19 January 2019, 01:41 PM

Interestingly to me at least, I just tried on the newer version of the JCDS and it actually seemed smaller lug to lug then the SD43. Obviously it is thicker, but was surprised it seemed to wear smaller when looking from above on the wrist. Anyone else have this experience?

SS Oyster · 19 January 2019, 02:48 PM

It’s not smaller, but it does big the wrist better due to the caseback being more flush with the case sides (due to massive DSSD thickness).

I have both and find the DSSD more comfortable.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JacksonStone · 19 January 2019, 03:23 PM

Here are measurements another member posted. This wouldn't include the latest DSSD, so I don't know if that impacts the measurements any. The lug-to-lug measurements are labeled as "Height" on the table. (Highlighting in original.)

Andad · 19 January 2019, 03:29 PM

Well there is lug width (20, 22, 22) and distance lug to lug (6 to 12)?

Did you understand the question?

JacksonStone · 19 January 2019, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

Well there is lug width (20, 22, 22) and distance lug to lug (6 to 12)?

Did you understand the question?

Whom are you addressing?

moyski · 19 January 2019, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directioneng

Well there is lug width (20, 22, 22) and distance lug to lug (6 to 12)?

Did you understand the question?

It seems you misread his post. Height in the table IS the lug to lug measurement. I have no idea what the highlight was for. Maybe it was for a different post.

JacksonStone · 19 January 2019, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moyski

I have no idea what the highlight was for. Maybe it was for a different post.

I linked to the original post for the table. Here's the description from the person who created it, which explains the highlighting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Desmodromic

As mentioned, I took some measurements and summarized them here. I don't have an SD4K or DSSD handy to measure, but some of their dimensions are pretty commonly understood. The measurements in yellow are what I believe to be correct, but don't have watches handy to measure.

direwolf · 20 January 2019, 02:08 AM

Thank you for the feedback. I think the measurements might be slightly different with regard to the updated version of the deep sea.

19 January 2019, 01:41 PM	#1
direwolf "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: USA Watch: 16610 Posts: 467	SD’s lug to lug Interestingly to me at least, I just tried on the newer version of the JCDS and it actually seemed smaller lug to lug then the SD43. Obviously it is thicker, but was surprised it seemed to wear smaller when looking from above on the wrist. Anyone else have this experience?

19 January 2019, 03:29 PM	#4
Andad 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Eddie Location: Australia Watch: A few. Posts: 36,861	Well there is lug width (20, 22, 22) and distance lug to lug (6 to 12)? Did you understand the question? __________________ E

19 January 2019, 02:48 PM	#2
SS Oyster "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 8,840	It’s not smaller, but it does big the wrist better due to the caseback being more flush with the case sides (due to massive DSSD thickness). I have both and find the DSSD more comfortable. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

19 January 2019, 03:23 PM	#3
JacksonStone Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Oregon Posts: 5,150	Here are measurements another member posted. This wouldn't include the latest DSSD, so I don't know if that impacts the measurements any. The lug-to-lug measurements are labeled as "Height" on the table. (Highlighting in original.)

20 January 2019, 02:08 AM	#8
direwolf "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: USA Watch: 16610 Posts: 467	Thank you for the feedback. I think the measurements might be slightly different with regard to the updated version of the deep sea.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)