The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 07:16 AM   #1
spellmanski
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: canada
Posts: 343
5513 vs 14060

Hi All - am seeking vintage experts and owners' feedback here!

I'm considering seeking out a "vintage" submariner with a tritium dial and I am torn between a 5513 and an early 14060.

I have a new sub date, so feel the 5513 would be all that more different comparatively.

Does the community have any strong thoughts or considerations I should be thinking about?

PS - it appears that finding a good 14060 example is easier than a good 5513....

Thank you in advance.
spellmanski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:46 AM   #2
hutch300
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jeff
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,315
I have a modern sub and a 5513. I wear the 5513 a ton and I think the charm of the acrylic crystal is unmatched.
hutch300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:52 AM   #3
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,103
Two completely different eras, one vintage and the other not.

The 14060 gives you modern features, sapphire, 3xxx movement, and the unmistakable look of a Sub.

The 5513 also has the same look but an earlier generation movement and plexi, plus hard to find parts.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 06:43 PM   #4
TuRo
"TRF" Member
 
TuRo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,563
5513 everyday - and if you have the budget - the earlier the better.
__________________
I know a lot of things that you don't
You wanna hear some?
She said, "Just give me something, anything
Well, give me all you got but not love"
DIFFERENT FOR GIRLS - Joe Jackson
TuRo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:19 PM   #5
brandrea
2024 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Two completely different eras, one vintage and the other not.

The 14060 gives you modern features, sapphire, 3xxx movement, and the unmistakable look of a Sub.

The 5513 also has the same look but an earlier generation movement and plexi, plus hard to find parts.
Pretty much this

They wear completely different OP, but I’m sure you know that.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:33 PM   #6
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Two completely different eras, one vintage and the other not.

The 14060 gives you modern features, sapphire, 3xxx movement, and the unmistakable look of a Sub.

The 5513 also has the same look but an earlier generation movement and plexi, plus hard to find parts.
+1 to this!
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:39 AM   #7
springer
2024 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,223
I currently own both examples, a 14060 and a 1972 Submariner 5513 and a glossy dial 5513 from the lat 1980s.

It's a buyer's choice, but you can't go wrong with a vintage 5513. Below are some 5513 photos, both the glossy and matte versions along with the 14060 model depicted in the last photo.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Img_0037.sm.jpg (73.3 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Img_8964.sm.jpg (154.0 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg box set.sm.jpg (121.8 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Img_5216.sm.jpg (136.5 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Img_09111.sm.jpg (110.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Img_7749sm.jpg (80.8 KB, 0 views)
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 08:49 AM   #8
Davidt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: U.K.
Posts: 73
I’m going to go against the grain and say a tritium 14060 with nicely patina’d markers is best, especially for daily wear. I have and still do wear 60’s/70’s watches frequently and for a number of years a 60’s 321 Speedmaster was my daily driver, but I love the 90’s 5 digit models as they’re better at standing up to daily wear (especially with young children) and still retain the classic look.
Davidt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.