ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dxk · 22 February 2018, 06:06 AM

Price is the same.

JorgeCCW · 22 February 2018, 06:12 AM

You say price is the same. Are we talking brand new from AD ? if thats the case, go Patek.
If we are talking 29-30k grey market , then you can go Lange.
Being the Patek forum expect favoritism to Patek

dxk · 22 February 2018, 06:29 AM

Brand new from AD, same price to me with good discount on both

remz07twos · 22 February 2018, 06:32 AM

I prefer the dial on the 5230 all day. I think a lot of Langes dials are too busy for me. Plus the guilloche creates a very pleasing affect to the eye.

Passionata · 22 February 2018, 06:42 AM

5230 for me.

Flex368 · 22 February 2018, 06:49 AM

I prefer the 5230.

JorgeCCW · 22 February 2018, 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dxk

Brand new from AD, same price to me with good discount on both

Patek will hold better over time, I am just not a fan of worldtimers, can't tell the time on those

but if you love it who cares about the time

PJ S · 22 February 2018, 06:56 AM

Hmm… not fussed on the stubby Patek hands, but it’s hard to dismiss it entirely.
All things considered, I’d probably lean towards the Lange.

Yk101 · 22 February 2018, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pj s

hmm… not fussed on the stubby patek hands, but it’s hard to dismiss it entirely.
All things considered, i’d probably lean towards the lange.

+1

Carry The Interest · 22 February 2018, 07:34 AM

Easy call for me - the Lange...but I am also a big Lange fan in general who is looking to get the Lange 1 in WG after my next sports watch.

Patek will undoubtedly retain it's value better but not sure how much that will/should impact your decision.

rolex_addict · 22 February 2018, 07:52 AM

Patek WT is just on another level! Get it and post some wrist shots

indexmatch · 22 February 2018, 08:11 AM

I prefer the ALS personally, but definitely can't go wrong either way

AK797 · 22 February 2018, 09:10 AM

I would first take the Lange 1 Moonphase over those two, but here PP.

toucan · 22 February 2018, 09:14 AM

I would look for a 5130.

Peterandwatches · 22 February 2018, 10:58 AM

Patek in this case. The WT is a classic Patek, and I like when the Lange 1 keeps it simple.

Jay (Eire) · 22 February 2018, 11:05 AM

ALS, more functional both in terms of time telling and you also have a date.

nyc2la · 22 February 2018, 03:06 PM

5131

.
.
.

Ok, otherwise, 5230 of these two.

texasmade · 22 February 2018, 03:45 PM

Lange. I’m not a fan of the guilloche on the 5230. I prefer the 5130 over the newer 5230.

vladamir15 · 22 February 2018, 04:48 PM

I like lange a lot, but i would say the Patek between those two. The lange looks a little too busy.

tyler1980 · 22 February 2018, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vladamir15

I like lange a lot, but i would say the Patek between those two. The lange looks a little too busy.

I agree. Its especially busy considering its not a WT and just a dual time zone watch.

VFA · 26 February 2018, 01:08 PM

Neither. Go vacheron for WT

kingofthehill · 26 February 2018, 02:18 PM

In my personal opinion the 5230 is a stronger proposition on all counts between these two pieces.

22 February 2018, 06:12 AM	#2
JorgeCCW "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Jorge Location: Ohio, USA Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP Posts: 4,675	You say price is the same. Are we talking brand new from AD ? if thats the case, go Patek. If we are talking 29-30k grey market , then you can go Lange. Being the Patek forum expect favoritism to Patek __________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein

22 February 2018, 06:42 AM	#5
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	5230 for me. __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

22 February 2018, 03:06 PM	#17
nyc2la "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Stephen Location: Beach Watch: 16660 Posts: 9,174	5131 . . . Ok, otherwise, 5230 of these two. __________________ "Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE

22 February 2018, 04:48 PM	#19
vladamir15 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: N/A Watch: AP, VC, Breguet Posts: 1,580	I like lange a lot, but i would say the Patek between those two. The lange looks a little too busy. __________________ The Most Valuable Commodity is Time Audemars, Vacheron, Breguet, Jaquet Droz, JLC, Rolex, Omega, Cartier

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

22 February 2018, 06:29 AM	#3
dxk "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: Boston Posts: 48	Brand new from AD, same price to me with good discount on both

22 February 2018, 06:32 AM	#4
remz07twos "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Location: Nash Posts: 148	I prefer the dial on the 5230 all day. I think a lot of Langes dials are too busy for me. Plus the guilloche creates a very pleasing affect to the eye.

22 February 2018, 06:49 AM	#6
Flex368 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Felix Location: GMT +1 Watch: Yes! Posts: 2,973	I prefer the 5230.

22 February 2018, 06:56 AM	#8
PJ S Banned Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: UK Posts: 3,990	Hmm… not fussed on the stubby Patek hands, but it’s hard to dismiss it entirely. All things considered, I’d probably lean towards the Lange.

22 February 2018, 07:34 AM	#10
Carry The Interest "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: LA Watch: RLX, ALS Posts: 3,410	Easy call for me - the Lange...but I am also a big Lange fan in general who is looking to get the Lange 1 in WG after my next sports watch. Patek will undoubtedly retain it's value better but not sure how much that will/should impact your decision.

22 February 2018, 07:52 AM	#11
rolex_addict "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: . Posts: 831	Patek WT is just on another level! Get it and post some wrist shots

22 February 2018, 08:11 AM	#12
indexmatch "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: SF Watch: BLNR, 116655, 5164 Posts: 191	I prefer the ALS personally, but definitely can't go wrong either way

22 February 2018, 09:10 AM	#13
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,218	I would first take the Lange 1 Moonphase over those two, but here PP.

22 February 2018, 09:14 AM	#14
toucan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: NYC Watch: 5970 Posts: 1,980	I would look for a 5130.

22 February 2018, 10:58 AM	#15
Peterandwatches "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: WA Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC Posts: 1,023	Patek in this case. The WT is a classic Patek, and I like when the Lange 1 keeps it simple.

22 February 2018, 11:05 AM	#16
Jay (Eire) 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: @jb.watching Location: NYC Posts: 1,467	ALS, more functional both in terms of time telling and you also have a date.

22 February 2018, 03:45 PM	#18
texasmade "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Real Name: Robert Location: Lone Star State Watch: AP RO 15400, FOIS Posts: 2,333	Lange. I’m not a fan of the guilloche on the 5230. I prefer the 5130 over the newer 5230.

26 February 2018, 01:08 PM	#21
VFA "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: SG Posts: 391	Neither. Go vacheron for WT

26 February 2018, 02:18 PM	#22
kingofthehill "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: World Posts: 485	In my personal opinion the 5230 is a stronger proposition on all counts between these two pieces.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)