ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 June 2015, 01:51 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
Most robust Rolex?
Just wondering what everyone thinks is the most robust Rolex? In terms of not easily scratched and can do every activity with? I find my explorer 2 picks up so many scratches but not so many dings.
|
5 June 2015, 01:57 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Sub.
|
5 June 2015, 01:58 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
I'd say the Explorer II. IMO its brushed finish hides scratches well. I realize you just stated that yours scratches easily, but compared to others in my collection with polished surfaces, trust me when I say that my Explorer II is by FAR the least pronged to scratches. The GMT function as well as the quick hour change makes this one of my most versital watches.
|
5 June 2015, 01:59 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
Another vote for the Submariner.
|
5 June 2015, 02:00 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 5,615
|
You're going to be dealing with tons of scratches with any metal watch that you wear frequently, although polished steel will show it more than brushed. Your steel Explorer II isn't going to scratch more or less than any other Rolex Oyster, although I guess something like a Sub will have a Ceramic bezel insert that is harder to scratch, or an older Sub has an aluminum bezel insert that you can replace easily and cheaply when it scratches. If you want, you can replace the bezel on your Explorer, also, when it gets too scratched.
|
5 June 2015, 02:01 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: Toronto
Watch: Deep Blue
Posts: 260
|
Deep Sea !
|
5 June 2015, 09:13 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,352
|
I have to agree that with the depth rating of the Deep Sea, it has to be the most robust, although every watch in the Oyster line is robust enough for 99% of the population 99% of the time.
My Rolex watches have as many scratches on the brushed surfaces as on the polished surfaces. 904L is the same polished or brushed.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
5 June 2015, 02:03 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,063
|
I would say the Sub-C as well. Exp 2 comes in 2nd place due to the bezel being able to show scratches (ceramic is scratch resistant)
|
28 June 2015, 12:53 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 325
|
Quote:
|
|
28 June 2015, 01:56 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: fl
Posts: 383
|
|
5 June 2015, 03:03 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow, UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 909
|
All watches will scratch. In general something without a rotating bezel is going to be more robust as there are less moving parts or break or get dirt in.
|
5 June 2015, 03:05 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
|
For me, I would go with the Explorer II. When I owned one, I would wear it for all of my outdoor and physical activities. After owning it for over 7 years, it showed very little signs of wear and tear.
The Submariner would also be next on my list as the most robust. Basically, the watches with brushed bracelets tend to hide the scratches better than polished.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 |
5 June 2015, 03:08 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 537
|
|
5 June 2015, 03:11 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
may not make sense but has been my experience |
|
5 June 2015, 03:56 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Posts: 1,343
|
Quote:
|
|
5 June 2015, 04:50 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
thanks appreciate that. maybe a Platinum DD, I think it is the metal more than the style watch |
|
5 June 2015, 04:00 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,792
|
Quote:
|
|
5 June 2015, 04:51 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
|
5 June 2015, 11:21 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
|
that just hurt my throat!
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
7 June 2015, 11:59 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
I love that watch, such interesting combinations that just work. The bezel looks like it's made from Bakelite and the blue is just dreamy, while the platinum has its own unique lustre. I'm glad to here it stands up to the task as well! 👍 |
|
5 June 2015, 03:20 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: John
Location: New York
Watch: ALL OF THEM
Posts: 260
|
I do not own one, but I assume a 116622 Yacht Master would be pretty tough due to the platinum bezel. The polished center links might pick up scratches though.
|
5 June 2015, 03:21 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,179
|
exp ii and sub.
|
5 June 2015, 03:51 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,113
|
to me, exp39 or even the older one. maybe even the standard mens 36mm OP.
its simple. no cyclops. no pcl's. not tall on the wrist. bezel doesn't overlap the case. |
5 June 2015, 10:49 PM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,093
|
|
5 June 2015, 03:58 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,256
|
Deep Sea without a doubt!!!
|
25 June 2015, 11:59 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Philip Foster
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: SubDate/GMTII/TTDJ
Posts: 168
|
|
5 June 2015, 04:05 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
SDC4K is a mini tank.
|
5 June 2015, 04:07 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Explorer 114270 and 214270.
|
5 June 2015, 10:39 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
|
Most robust Rolex?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.