The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 February 2015, 02:46 AM   #1
stradman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Watch: TBA
Posts: 91
Speculation on 5970 numbers

Hi Everyone,
Seeing that most people would ask their Genie for a 5970, I tried to find out how many were produced.
Obviously I know its speculation as Patek does't publish number but I found a thread about this and wonder if many of you would roundly agree of disagee with some of their conclusions......

http://firstwristwatch.com/patek-1/I...continued.html
stradman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2015, 06:49 PM   #2
stradman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Watch: TBA
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by stradman View Post
Hi Everyone,
Seeing that most people would ask their Genie for a 5970, I tried to find out how many were produced.
Obviously I know its speculation as Patek does't publish number but I found a thread about this and wonder if many of you would roundly agree of disagee with some of their conclusions......

http://firstwristwatch.com/patek-1/I...continued.html
Wow 147 views but not 1 reply! Must have said something wrong.....
stradman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2015, 09:16 PM   #3
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 6,007
Haha! Too many debates on the subject already I guess!
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2015, 09:54 PM   #4
iazrollie
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Ian
Location: NY
Watch: All of them
Posts: 3,245
The head of an large auction house said 1,000 rose, 750 white, 500 platinum and 500 yellow.
__________________
Rolex, PPs, Breitling
iazrollie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2015, 10:04 PM   #5
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by iazrollie View Post
The head of an large auction house said 1,000 rose, 750 white, 500 platinum and 500 yellow.
I have heard 800 of R and G, 500 of P and less than 200 of J. Who knows but all we know is that the J and P the least and R and G are probably the same. Also demand for J the least and thus price as well even though it is rarest. The R has higher demand than J and G and sells at premium. Of course the P sells for the most as expected. Overall it is a highly sought after piece and to me represents the very best of Patek. Sadly those days are gone! As for numbers there will always be senate as only Patek knows the true numbers.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2015, 11:07 PM   #6
Daytonaman799
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,521
When i bought mine I was put in touch by a collector with a PP expert who told me that J was the least produced, likely less than 100 because of what Gold did during the 2008 production run when PP did not hedge Gold prices. R was ore but the most produced were in P and G as white metals have been in the most demand for the last 20+ yrs. This is still reflected in the trading values today.
Daytonaman799 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 01:47 AM   #7
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
Material cost is a fraction of the MSRP, I highly doubt it's the cause of the low production. Companies likes to lead people to think the cost of producing the goods is higher than what it actually is.

It's not the cost of making them that's expensive, it's the cost of selling them.
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 04:39 AM   #8
myopiccoog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 948
Thierry told me personally that the J is by far the least produce. I said really? Compared to P? He followed up and said way less. From the horses mouth.

I heard about the hedge. Also at the time you had the financial meltdown and some currency issues. I believe the G and R last retail price was around 89k. The J came out at 128k and the P came out at 138k. I think all of those things made the J soft which made Patek pull the plug and go P after 8 months.
myopiccoog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 05:26 AM   #9
stradman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Watch: TBA
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by myopiccoog View Post
Thierry told me personally that the J is by far the least produce. I said really? Compared to P? He followed up and said way less. From the horses mouth.

I heard about the hedge. Also at the time you had the financial meltdown and some currency issues. I believe the G and R last retail price was around 89k. The J came out at 128k and the P came out at 138k. I think all of those things made the J soft which made Patek pull the plug and go P after 8 months.
Well that is interesting but I guess if you take into consideration that maybe yellow gold was not as desirable its makes sense...But way less?....What like maybe 150? Who knows....
stradman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 07:49 AM   #10
Kittayos
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Bkk
Posts: 309
The j still doesn't appeal to the majority as reflected in today's price, less than a retailed price back then.
Kittayos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 08:14 AM   #11
stradman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: UK
Watch: TBA
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kittayos View Post
The j still doesn't appeal to the majority as reflected in today's price, less than a retailed price back then.
True...but do remember fads change and what goes round may come round. No one knows of course but just saying. I guess people should buy what they like and speaks to them today, but I can't help thinking that many people do buy things like jewelry depending on the the fashion or trend of the day. And although a watch is a watch it is adorned or framed by a precious metal(which is subjected to fads), the tastes of which may and probably will change. So what may not be desirable today(i.e.J) may become desirable tomorrow. If that did happen and yellow gold became "in" again you can imagine what the price of a 5970J would command considering the aforementioned small production numbers. Again this is totally hypothetical and no one knows, but just saying........
stradman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 09:27 AM   #12
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
I checked the gold and platinum prices in 2007 and 2008..

In those 2 years, gold went from $650/ounce to close $1k. While platinum went from close to $2k/ounce at one point down to around $1k/ounce.

As those two prices converge Patek likely saw an opportunity to switch to Platinum where they can charge a higher MSRP, but the cost not much different than from gold.
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 12:39 PM   #13
soundserious
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: usofmfa
Posts: 3,157
how many A's? now you're talking rare...
soundserious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 05:28 PM   #14
tom2517
"TRF" Member
 
tom2517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Asia & US
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundserious View Post
how many A's? now you're talking rare...
5970 was never made in steel for public, but with Patek you never know if they made some one offs for special clients, as some times you do see unusual Pateks pop at auctions that no one knew it was made before.
tom2517 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 09:04 PM   #15
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,809
750 up to 1000 is more than I expected. That is as good as the same as the 5070.
Since the 5970 has an extra complication I would have guessed less 5970

But maybe once again patek prefered to make the more expensive pieces. The base calibre
is the same but the 5970 is more expensive so I m sure the profit on these is bigger

Just like they made 500 platinum 5970 (if these posts above are correct) and only 150 or so platinum 5070
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 February 2015, 09:59 PM   #16
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown View Post
750 up to 1000 is more than I expected. That is as good as the same as the 5070.
Since the 5970 has an extra complication I would have guessed less 5970

But maybe once again patek prefered to make the more expensive pieces. The base calibre
is the same but the 5970 is more expensive so I m sure the profit on these is bigger

Just like they made 500 platinum 5970 (if these posts above are correct) and only 150 or so platinum 5070
Bruno the truth is nobody knows the real numbers and it is all pure speculation as you know. The only thing we do know is that the J was least produced and also least in demand. All of them are very collectible and still rare with strong demand.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.