The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 January 2020, 09:25 AM   #1
soicanbefree
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 262
As fast as they appeared... they have now disappeared.

https://imgur.com/a/xZRgNsE

It seems the "blueberry" has been banished to the nether realm.

It is now a truly rare item with 0 listings on chrono24 and 0 hits on watchrecon.
__________________
Modern: 116610LV / 114300 / AP 15202ST / PP 5065A
Vintage: 1016 - Gilt Chapter Ring Underline + Exclamation Point / 16618 - Black / 1803 Orange Stella Dial
soicanbefree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 09:56 AM   #2
oysterquartz17000
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: AWOL
Watch: Submariner 16803
Posts: 487
Speaking of Rolex's I wouldn't want to own...
oysterquartz17000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:37 AM   #3
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,590
That’s pretty crazy...somebody is taking a bath
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:44 AM   #4
offrdmania
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,833
Im sure they just swapped out the inserts and listed them as pepsis
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:59 AM   #5
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Still haven't seen any conclusive evidence either way... Not my cup of tea, anyway.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 11:06 AM   #6
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
Still haven't seen any conclusive evidence either way... Not my cup of tea, anyway.
I don’t think anybody’s cup of tea is paying 10-20k extra for something that might be fake...
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 11:10 AM   #7
offrdmania
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,833
I wonder if any of these people are kicking themselves now..

https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/search?q=blueberry
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 11:37 AM   #8
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1665fan View Post
I don’t think anybody’s cup of tea is paying 10-20k extra for something that might be fake...
I don't like Blueberry inserts, but I do like proper evidence on which to base decisions. I guess we've been over this before...
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 11:47 AM   #9
BigBlue1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
BigBlue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Webmaster
Location: Space
Watch: it pal !
Posts: 2,955
Hmmmmmm and to think , I thought this was going to be about UFOs.
__________________
" Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford".
Cindy Crawford

Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got
RIP Mikey
BigBlue1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 09:30 PM   #10
soicanbefree
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
I don't like Blueberry inserts, but I do like proper evidence on which to base decisions. I guess we've been over this before...
It's not a court of law. The blueberry insert is considered guilty until proven innocent.

I think many to most observers believe the fact pattern suggest it is not a legitimate Rolex item.

The fact that all dealer listings have disappeared is another data point that is certainly not in its favor.

Most of the advocates for it have some exposure. Whether that is as an owner or a dealer.
__________________
Modern: 116610LV / 114300 / AP 15202ST / PP 5065A
Vintage: 1016 - Gilt Chapter Ring Underline + Exclamation Point / 16618 - Black / 1803 Orange Stella Dial
soicanbefree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 09:35 PM   #11
soicanbefree
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
Im sure they just swapped out the inserts and listed them as pepsis
You mean swapped it back.


Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
I wonder if any of these people are kicking themselves now..

https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/search?q=blueberry
I would seek a refund.

I was reading a 2018 Bobs blueberry GMT listings and clicked on the guarantee.

"BOB'S WATCHES
100% CERTIFIED AUTHENTIC
At Bob's Watches, your trust is very important to us. We believe that buying a pre-owned Rolex watch online should be simple, honest, and straightforward. To that end, we guarantee that every Rolex watch on our site is 100% authentic, comprised entirely of Rolex parts. Our mission is to be the leading trusted online source for selling and buying authentic pre-owned Rolex watches. We stand behind this authenticity guarantee with a full money back refund on any watch not found to be completely genuine."

I would say most dealers operate under similar language and should happily accept a return.
__________________
Modern: 116610LV / 114300 / AP 15202ST / PP 5065A
Vintage: 1016 - Gilt Chapter Ring Underline + Exclamation Point / 16618 - Black / 1803 Orange Stella Dial
soicanbefree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:06 PM   #12
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
I wonder if any of these people are kicking themselves now..

https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/search?q=blueberry
Out of those 15 or so blueberrys I see no fade or scratches on any of them....cannot be correct for a 40 year old insert let alone all of them
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:18 PM   #13
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Nothing has changed. They aren’t more or less fake today than they were ten years ago. I highly doubt anyone would accept a return based on a troll on IG and a couple of forum threads where nothing have been established. The letter that started the discussion is highly questionable to begin with.

It’s pretty obvious why no one wants to sell them right now. Wait half a year or so and I am sure they will be on the market again. With a premium. No idea if they sell but nothing really changed except that more people are up to date with them. Some like them; some don’t. Likely less people like them now but I think very few of those that have discussed them have been potential buyers anyway.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:34 PM   #14
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by soicanbefree View Post
The blueberry insert is considered guilty until proven innocent.
Not sure why.

Point is, it's all circumstantial. Again, I'm not an advocate of these inserts. I've never liked them, I don't have one and I have no dog in this fight, but I haven't seen any conclusive evidence either way, so it seems odd to take such a concrete stance on the matter.

Admittedly, I am playing devil's advocate, but it feels like this anti-Blueberry movement is bordering on a witch hunt now. The fact that we don't see them trashed with age doesn't mean anything.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:38 PM   #15
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 993
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1665fan View Post
Out of those 15 or so blueberrys I see no fade or scratches on any of them....cannot be correct for a 40 year old insert let alone all of them
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 10:51 PM   #16
Paulie 50
"TRF" Member
 
Paulie 50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lancs. England
Posts: 993
I think it's sad that this topic has been resurrected; whatever the current market is saying as to none being for sale etc. The bottom line is, that you would have to fall over, bang your head and Lobotomise yourself to even think about buying one of these watches. That's my take anyway.
Paulie 50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 11:10 PM   #17
mountainjogger
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBlue1 View Post
Hmmmmmm and to think , I thought this was going to be about UFOs.
Same here!
__________________
The King of Cool.
mountainjogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2020, 11:13 PM   #18
soicanbefree
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by roh123 View Post
Nothing has changed. They aren’t more or less fake today than they were ten years ago. I highly doubt anyone would accept a return based on a troll on IG and a couple of forum threads where nothing have been established. The letter that started the discussion is highly questionable to begin with.

It’s pretty obvious why no one wants to sell them right now. Wait half a year or so and I am sure they will be on the market again. With a premium. No idea if they sell but nothing really changed except that more people are up to date with them. Some like them; some don’t. Likely less people like them now but I think very few of those that have discussed them have been potential buyers anyway.
This a very fair and level headed take.

You don't try to sell your beach property right after a hurricane comes through.

I do think if you wanted to make a return you would have a strong case. I'm surprised we haven't had anyone testing those waters and posting about it.

And I have to admit I wouldn't have bought 10 years ago so I was never a potential customer or believer. It is the same thing that keeps me away from Panna or Stella dials.

Too easy and valuable to fake that one desirable part and add 10-20K in value to an otherwise common reference.
__________________
Modern: 116610LV / 114300 / AP 15202ST / PP 5065A
Vintage: 1016 - Gilt Chapter Ring Underline + Exclamation Point / 16618 - Black / 1803 Orange Stella Dial
soicanbefree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 01:56 AM   #19
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
Not sure why.

Point is, it's all circumstantial. Again, I'm not an advocate of these inserts. I've never liked them, I don't have one and I have no dog in this fight, but I haven't seen any conclusive evidence either way, so it seems odd to take such a concrete stance on the matter.

Admittedly, I am playing devil's advocate, but it feels like this anti-Blueberry movement is bordering on a witch hunt now. The fact that we don't see them trashed with age doesn't mean anything.
Why? Because you need actual proof that they're legit. There is none. In fact, there's way more evidence that they're not legit.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 02:26 AM   #20
athom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
Not sure why.

Point is, it's all circumstantial. Again, I'm not an advocate of these inserts. I've never liked them, I don't have one and I have no dog in this fight, but I haven't seen any conclusive evidence either way, so it seems odd to take such a concrete stance on the matter.

Admittedly, I am playing devil's advocate, but it feels like this anti-Blueberry movement is bordering on a witch hunt now. The fact that we don't see them trashed with age doesn't mean anything.
I don't like them, I don't own one but the fact is that there are not legit...and I've always asked myself why there are no scratches, no patina, no faded, there all look the same, for such old things, that's very strange...
athom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 06:20 AM   #21
saskmh
"TRF" Member
 
saskmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,027
I am confused about some of the comments.....Didn't Rolex make a statement just recently stating that they NEVER made all blue inserts for the GMT?

Or was this just some hype that popped up on social media earlier this winter?
__________________
RCN (Canadian) Tudor Milsub database co-manager
saskmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 07:21 AM   #22
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by saskmh View Post
I am confused about some of the comments.....Didn't Rolex make a statement just recently stating that they NEVER made all blue inserts for the GMT?

Or was this just some hype that popped up on social media earlier this winter?
You are correct, but there's a question about whether the Rolex rep in Geneva who wrote the letter was knowledgable enough to be the final authority on the matter, and it's in French with wording such as "as far as we know," which could be open to interpretation. Not my opinion, but that's what is being debated.

There is also an old service estimate floating around from an RSC about a 1675 with an all-blue insert that acknowledges the insert without questioning it. So, the thinking is if the RSC referenced an all-blue insert on official Rolex paperwork then it must be legit/real. Again, not my opinion, but that's what is being debated.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 11:21 AM   #23
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by swish77 View Post
You are correct, but there's a question about whether the Rolex rep in Geneva who wrote the letter was knowledgable enough to be the final authority on the matter, and it's in French with wording such as "as far as we know," which could be open to interpretation. Not my opinion, but that's what is being debated.

There is also an old service estimate floating around from an RSC about a 1675 with an all-blue insert that acknowledges the insert without questioning it. So, the thinking is if the RSC referenced an all-blue insert on official Rolex paperwork then it must be legit/real. Again, not my opinion, but that's what is being debated.
Excellent summary of the situation. I don't believe they're real. I don't believe they're fake. I just don't know.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 12:09 PM   #24
oysterquartz17000
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: AWOL
Watch: Submariner 16803
Posts: 487
Why doesnt an owner of a blueberry put us out of our misery and take their watch to RSC for a service quote and just see what happens. It will be very interesting!
oysterquartz17000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 05:50 PM   #25
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by oysterquartz17000 View Post
Why doesnt an owner of a blueberry put us out of our misery and take their watch to RSC for a service quote and just see what happens. It will be very interesting!
Because people at the service center know exactly as much as we do. Arthur bringing his put-together UAE dial, red hand GMT with a blueberry insert to a RSC is what started this whole mess to begin with when they gave him service papers for it.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 10:07 PM   #26
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,590
Very true....at this point is like Bigfoot....Rolex cannot confirm or debunk the myth because they have no clue also
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2020, 10:30 PM   #27
roh123
"TRF" Member
 
roh123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1665fan View Post
Very true....at this point is like Bigfoot....Rolex cannot confirm or debunk the myth because they have no clue also
I’m sure there are people at Rolex that knows. The problem is however that most people at Rolex don’t know. Ie the service people at a random service center.
__________________
Instagram: @perj123
roh123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2020, 01:01 AM   #28
donq
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas tx
Watch: 16610,1675,16030
Posts: 1,135
The greatest trick the devil ever played,
Was convincing the world the Blueberry GMT didn’t exist!
donq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2020, 07:48 AM   #29
1watch
"TRF" Member
 
1watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
Not sure there has been a definitive call on this topic one way or the other. Right now it’s certainly trending to be very suspect of their authenticity.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2020, 08:43 AM   #30
cwilson13
"TRF" Member
 
cwilson13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,492
I have sent a request to Rolex HQ asking them to once and for all to confirm or deny the existence of Bigfoot. I will post their response once it is received.
cwilson13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.