ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 April 2010, 10:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Watch: Rolex SDDS
Posts: 126
|
EPIC BATTLE: GMT MASTER II vs SUB 116610
Hello Everyone!
I would like to know your opinion about the epic battle between the GMT master II 116710: and the new Submariner, 116610: Which one is cooler? Is there any difference between price and weight ? Who wins? |
26 April 2010, 12:43 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Qro, Mexico
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 80
|
Something's wrong with that ceramic Sub, I'm pretty sure the one coming out has no PCL's...
Plus, I have the GMT so it wins. |
26 April 2010, 01:55 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
the ceramic sub pic is incorrect.... but I believe sub will win still... i have gmt II c though....
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
26 April 2010, 10:59 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bangkok
Watch: GMT II C
Posts: 217
|
I don't believe that ceramic sub pic is an official one. The pcls and also the protective shoulders for the crown should be more blocky in appearance.
That said, as fond as i am of my gmtIIC, given the choice I'd go for the new sub....I may still do so. |
26 April 2010, 11:21 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: LasIslasFilipinas
Watch: TT GMT IIc
Posts: 826
|
Here's a picture of the new Sub Ceramic.
Tough choice but if we're talking exclusively stainless steel then the Sub C wins. |
26 April 2010, 11:52 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 147
|
Can you guys state your reasoning for why you like one over the other? I'm curious to know if its just because of something like pcl's or if its something more. Thanks
As for me I think I the 116710 has an edge. The I think its the symmetry of the bezel that does it for me. As for pcl's, I can go either way. I really like the look of the polished but don't know if I would want it on an every day watch. I guess the best solution is to have both, Sub for every day activities and the GMT for special occasions. |
26 April 2010, 11:53 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: north vancouver
Watch: 1680 / speedy pro
Posts: 474
|
It used to be that the twin lock vs trip lock and the slimmer build vs the chunkier build would help to differentiate the two. Now, besides their obvious functional differences, they are very similar. Tougher choice than ever.
So it's down to: complication - point GMT. If you travel, the GMT day to day function - point Sub, you can time your eggs by the bezel bling - point sub for it's more understated centre links (my bias shared by others) colour splash - point GMT for the green hand classic points - sub I think I'd go the sub, but I have a GMT 16750 already which makes the choice easier.
__________________
1997 Speedmaster Pro: Hesalite, steel back, three dials and manual wind. The classic. 1969 Submariner 1680: Very refreshed - The diver. 1950's Milus: 18k gold, manual wind, no date - the dinner watch. Seiko 6309 The perfect watch for a trip to Mexico. |
27 April 2010, 12:32 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Watch: Rolex SDDS
Posts: 126
|
The price is very simillar too...
Despite loving the Submariner so much, i think i do prefer the GMT. Still wondering how the PCL´s will be after 1 year of daily use.. Can any one tell me that? |
27 April 2010, 02:13 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
Sub is my choice. I am not a fan of the GMT IIc polished links as they are scratch magnets. I purchased a SS Daytona some eight months ago and even with a mixed rotation the polished links show the wear. I have had subs for years and due to their brushed bands they look great after years of use.
That being said, I believe I will one day own both. I intend to always have a sub, and would like the GMT as it has the GMT movement and supports that function and it is sooooo cool that you can adjust the hour without resetting the time. I currently have a LV and am looking to purchase a GMT IIc. May look at the new Sub in a year or two from now and dump the LV. |
27 April 2010, 11:44 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
GMT IIc on beauty, Sub C on brawn
Cheers
__________________
|
27 April 2010, 11:53 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
From the pics (real - and not the ones posted of the Sub here)...the GMT2cSS is the outstanding Rolex in it's class....the new Sub C SS doesn't even come close...nowhere near.....IMHO...
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
27 April 2010, 11:56 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Fernando
Location: North Carolina
Watch: SS White Daytona
Posts: 1,944
|
Difficult decision.... I like them both....I just may have to buy both of them...
__________________
The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new lands but seeing with new eyes. —Marcel Proust |
28 April 2010, 03:08 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 980
|
New Sub for me. I currently own the GMT ceramic but the Sub is the iconic Rolex!
__________________
2023 Watch Collection Panerai: 249 California, 232, 390 Rolex: Starbucks Tudor: Blue Pelagos |
28 April 2010, 04:48 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,903
|
Not fussed on either as i do not like the green hand or writing on the GMT IIc and not over the moon about ceramic bezels.
|
28 April 2010, 04:57 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Watch: Rolex SDDS
Posts: 126
|
Can somebody show pictures of the GMT 116710, with a year or so, to evaluate how scratch magnet the PCL´s really are?
A Daytona SS will also be ok. |
28 April 2010, 06:47 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: London, UK
Watch: SS GMT2C
Posts: 27
|
I own the GMT2C, but I also want the new sub :)
Need to grow more arms to wear all these watches at once... |
28 April 2010, 07:41 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Watch: Rolex SDDS
Posts: 126
|
|
28 April 2010, 08:04 AM | #18 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: London, UK
Watch: SS GMT2C
Posts: 27
|
Quote:
Scratches don't bother me. If I wanted a watch unscratched, then I would keep it in a safe and never wear it. |
|
28 April 2010, 08:55 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Watch: Rolex SDDS
Posts: 126
|
Sure mate!
The thing is, as i never had a Rolex, i am a bit afraid of getting the watch all scratched (everyone is saying the PCL´s are a scratch magnet). in that case i would rather waite for the new sub.. i will waite for some photos, so i can decide better |
28 April 2010, 10:37 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
brushed doesn't mean it doesn't get scratched... it doesn't show the scratches if compared to PCL....
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
28 April 2010, 11:14 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 97
|
|
28 April 2010, 11:16 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 461
|
Correct me if I am wrong but isn't this an unfair argument? Aren't both watches literally the same exact thing except the gmt has a different bezel and can keep time in two zones white the sub has a different bezel and can go deeper in water?
Isn't this really more of a comparison between time zone functionality vs diving functionality? If you are talking about looks though, the GMT wins although I wouldn't be complaining if someone gave me either one.
__________________
PAM 372, PAM 424, PAM 720, PAM 968, AP 15500, 116610LV, 126710BLRO, Sistem51, G-Shock Soon to come: AP 26401 RG, AP 15202OR, Patek 3940G |
28 April 2010, 12:07 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston USA
Watch: Pepsi & Starbucks
Posts: 1,777
|
Quote:
1. I already have a 16610 2. I can get gmt2c for a lot less money since they are available in abundance..116610 may be hard to come by in the next year or so.. |
|
29 April 2010, 01:43 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Miguel
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Watch: Rolex SDDS
Posts: 126
|
Sure mpkRolex,
But as i dont ever had a Rolex, i was only considering purchasing one or another. [B]Do you guys know when will the 116610 Sub be available in European Stores?B] |
29 April 2010, 11:34 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: HaNgat
Location: Jakarta
Watch: Sports Rolex
Posts: 648
|
Both wins my friends...
__________________
Cartier Tank / Suunto Stinger / 16014 / 16610LV / PAM 233 / 116520 / 14060M / 16710 / Omega Constellation |
30 April 2010, 03:34 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 3,417
|
ceramic bezel Sub
I prefer the understated classic appearance of the Sub and the additional complication of the GMT2.
If I could have only one, I would choose the new ceramic bezel Sub because looks like the watch it replaced. The GMT2 ceramic does not have the classic appearance of the watch it replaced. |
30 April 2010, 08:01 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
|
GMTIIc over Subc anyday. if i want a sub i prefer the older one over the C
__________________
16 GS Titles 16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi) 23 Consecutive GS semifinals 17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1 5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups 5 consecutive US open 4 Australian open 1 Sweet french open a crown for every achievement The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex |
30 April 2010, 01:14 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
I think i will love sub c when it comes out !!!!
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
30 April 2010, 05:32 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,448
|
based on looks
if i want a square classic look, i would go sub but i feel ceramic to be more luxury than tool. anyway i accept its the end for the old 16610 the gmt is more modern and curvy. winner - gmt based on price with just these small improvements to the sub it doesnt seem worth it. the gmt looks like it was really overhauled what i like are the improvements on bracelet for all modern rolex models what are your opinions? |
30 April 2010, 07:32 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Omega Seiko
Posts: 1,562
|
GMT, i still dont understand why its cheaper..
__________________
https://www.instagram.com/invites/co...ontent=5yeough |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.