ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Ko7ex · 13 August 2012, 06:06 PM

got to try on my dream watch last night. I instantly fell in love and didnt want to give it back! Time to start saving hard so I can have one of my own!

travisb · 13 August 2012, 06:22 PM

BAM!
Now that has some shine to it!
Lots of saving ahead..

crs12 · 13 August 2012, 06:40 PM

I think the one you have on in your avatar is nicer.

One above is too blingy for me and less is more.

horseco · 13 August 2012, 06:45 PM

I have had the privileged of wearing one... Its like no other...

padi56 · 13 August 2012, 07:03 PM

Not for me now perhaps a nice plain DD although not a huge fan of precious metal watches,my own personal dream watch is a 1930-40s Rolex Prince pref in SS.

Ko7ex · 13 August 2012, 07:12 PM

I would tend to agree, I have always prefered plain and classy as opposed to bling but the sheer weight and feel of this watch was amazing and I instantly fell in love with it. Unfortunately my girfriend was with me at the time and she now wants the ladies version! she has no chance until I own the mens one

Beelzy · 14 August 2012, 12:40 AM

......Hold on, let me get my sunglasses.

That's a fair amount of bling there.

floater156 · 14 August 2012, 01:23 AM

If I had no other choice, I could live with a diamond dial markers, but not a diamond bezel.

77T · 14 August 2012, 01:34 AM

That will be some über savings my friend. Meteorite dial is the most interesting part to me. The diamonds work for some but alas not me.

You could stare into that dial and get lost in the big bang theory!

tom2517 · 14 August 2012, 01:46 AM

Someone over at a Taiwanese Rolex forum just bought one.

He also got a PP 5016P.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1344872739.397651.jpg

munshpe · 14 August 2012, 02:22 AM

Between the two, the PP is the winner!

HL65 · 14 August 2012, 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by munshpe

Between the two, the PP is the winner!

With a $750K price tag it better be!

azguy · 14 August 2012, 03:01 AM

OP, please don't take it personal, but that watch is just not right......

RRGHOST1 · 14 August 2012, 04:48 AM

The problem with the blingy DD is it looks like a fake its that blingy. A nice plain DD is a fine watch as said before The DD next to the PP looks better but its still too blingy for me.

13 August 2012, 07:03 PM	#5
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 52,363	Not for me now perhaps a nice plain DD although not a huge fan of precious metal watches,my own personal dream watch is a 1930-40s Rolex Prince pref in SS. __________________ ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

14 August 2012, 01:23 AM	#8
floater156 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Real Name: Chris Location: Wisconsin Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,984	If I had no other choice, I could live with a diamond dial markers, but not a diamond bezel. __________________ Lead by example through production.

14 August 2012, 01:34 AM	#9
77T 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 40,876	That will be some über savings my friend. Meteorite dial is the most interesting part to me. The diamonds work for some but alas not me. You could stare into that dial and get lost in the big bang theory! __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

14 August 2012, 04:48 AM	#14
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,903	The problem with the blingy DD is it looks like a fake its that blingy. A nice plain DD is a fine watch as said before The DD next to the PP looks better but its still too blingy for me. __________________ RRGHOST1

13 August 2012, 06:22 PM	#2
travisb 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 32,330	BAM! Now that has some shine to it! Lots of saving ahead..

13 August 2012, 06:40 PM	#3
crs12 Banned Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: London Watch: Explorer I Posts: 167	I think the one you have on in your avatar is nicer. One above is too blingy for me and less is more.

13 August 2012, 06:45 PM	#4
horseco "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Anthony Location: North Jersey Watch: Daytona 116528 Posts: 3,385	I have had the privileged of wearing one... Its like no other...

13 August 2012, 07:12 PM	#6
Ko7ex Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: UK Watch: 15210 & 116200 Posts: 28	I would tend to agree, I have always prefered plain and classy as opposed to bling but the sheer weight and feel of this watch was amazing and I instantly fell in love with it. Unfortunately my girfriend was with me at the time and she now wants the ladies version! she has no chance until I own the mens one

14 August 2012, 12:40 AM	#7
Beelzy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Chris Location: Cen-Cal Watch: 16610 Posts: 869	......Hold on, let me get my sunglasses. That's a fair amount of bling there.

14 August 2012, 01:46 AM	#10
tom2517 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Asia & US Posts: 1,550	Someone over at a Taiwanese Rolex forum just bought one. He also got a PP 5016P. ImageUploadedByTapatalk1344872739.397651.jpg

14 August 2012, 02:22 AM	#11
munshpe "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: USA Posts: 135	Between the two, the PP is the winner!

14 August 2012, 03:01 AM	#13
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	OP, please don't take it personal, but that watch is just not right......

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)