The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 January 2018, 03:46 PM   #1
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Need Advice On DayDate

I've been back in the DD market as of late, and the watch I settle on will not be a safe queen. I'm wanting something I can wear daily and for a long time. I'm quite drawn to a 228235 or even a 118206, but I've found a a K serial 118238 near me which I'm not at all opposed to.. and it's $10k less that either of the previous options mentioned. One thing I'm an absolute stickler on is wanting the heavier band with solid end links found starting on the P (2000) serials. Of course, Rolex then upgraded the clasp starting with the F serials a couple of years later. I actually had one of these on my previous DD that I could kick myself for selling. I was only 27, timid about all gold, and wanted to pay off my house, so the watch was sold. Needless to say, values have gone up substantially in the subsequent 10 years But I digress.

What are your thoughts on the clasps of newer models with president bands? Is it substantial enough of a difference that it would be a deal breaker? Or a relatively minor perk in the grand scheme? And if you have any thoughts in general on the DD's with the info I've provided, I'm happy to hear those as well.

I've attached pics of both the old and new style clasp for those new to the topic or researching for themselves.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1571.JPG (52.1 KB, 826 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1572.JPG (37.6 KB, 823 views)
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 03:54 PM   #2
jschmidtdmd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,294
If price is not a concern, get yourself a new DD40.

New movement, best bracelet yet.....etc. etc. etc.

No reason to go back in time, unless that's what you want.
__________________
Watches!
jschmidtdmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 04:10 PM   #3
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,726
If it's to be a daily wearer, don't the newer bracelets have the ceramic inserts in the link tubes to help against premature wear?
Or have they been around for a while?
Cheers

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 05:11 PM   #4
Cubdrick
"TRF" Member
 
Cubdrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: La Cañada, CA
Watch: 16710
Posts: 144
Jack Nicklaus’ 1803 was a daily for 40+ years without any problems, nor upgrades.
Cubdrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 06:51 PM   #5
returntorolex
"TRF" Member
 
returntorolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Jackie Stewart DD
Posts: 5,649
Wait to find an example with the fat buckle.
__________________
Rolex - Tudor - Omega - Breitling - Oris - Grand Seiko - Timex - Casio - Ocean Crawler - Ganymede - American Waltham - Seiko - Gruen - Arethusa - Citizen - Sinn - Nodus - Formex
returntorolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 07:08 PM   #6
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,180
My one and only DD was a Rose Gold "P", white dial with Romans. I went with the P as you said becuase I wanted the sold links.

I'd pass on the K cuz there has to be a weight difference right? But 10 K savings might sway me.

Paying off your house was the right move. I'm sure that has appreciated too.
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 09:01 PM   #7
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
I’ve been wearing a YG DD I bought in the mid80s daily. Still looks good, keeps excellent time, and fits well even with a sloppy bracelet.

If I were to replace it, I’d buy the new model. Its a much better watch.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 January 2018, 11:41 PM   #8
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,479
Quote:
Originally Posted by jschmidtdmd View Post
If price is not a concern, get yourself a new DD40.

New movement, best bracelet yet.....etc. etc. etc.

No reason to go back in time, unless that's what you want.
Agreed. That 10k you "save" is not going to mean much if it's not the watch you want.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 12:48 AM   #9
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiss Mad! View Post
If it's to be a daily wearer, don't the newer bracelets have the ceramic inserts in the link tubes to help against premature wear?
Or have they been around for a while?
Cheers

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
They are new to the gold models, were on the platinum DD2s.

Go for the DD40, it's a really smart and more durable watch now.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 01:40 AM   #10
Old Geezer
"TRF" Member
 
Old Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Earth
Watch: 126619LB and more
Posts: 5,207
$10K is nothing to sneeze at. That’s another watch. That said, I’ve shopped DDs recently and like the features of the newer model. Weight, ceramic inserts, etc give the new model a very nice feel on the wrist.
Old Geezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 03:22 AM   #11
Tangier11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Paul
Location: Southern Virginia
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 2,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubdrick View Post
Jack Nicklaus’ 1803 was a daily for 40+ years without any problems, nor upgrades.


Just because its 18K does not mean it is a fragile piece. As with all Rolex watches they are built like tanks!! Rolex has made some upgrades, but as stated even an 1803 if a tank!
Tangier11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 03:38 AM   #12
farscott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Scott
Location: Dunedin, FL, USA
Posts: 134
The new clasp design is a worthwhile upgrade to me, but I am still wearing my watches with the older clasp design with no issues. For me, the new clasp is not worth $10k, and I like the 36-mm models. So I would get the 118238.
farscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 04:06 AM   #13
Wahlberg
"TRF" Member
 
Wahlberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,536
When did the K-serial start? I tried googling but couldn't find anything.
Wahlberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 04:23 AM   #14
farscott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Scott
Location: Dunedin, FL, USA
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wahlberg View Post
When did the K-serial start? I tried googling but couldn't find anything.
2000 was the start of K-prefix.
farscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 05:43 AM   #15
Jeffreyc87
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 369
Yellow Gold Watch and Band but Rose Gold Clasp

The picture on the left, of the older DD models, illustrates something that I have brought up before but have been kinda shot down as wrong.

For a long time, on Rolex YG watches, especially DD, they made the clasps from a different color 18kt gold alloy...it looks more pinkish but not necessarily enough to be considered rose gold.

I have heard vintage collectors who agree with my observation call it "third color gold" and it is an 18kt gold alloy in btw yg and rg that is slightly more durable..hence.....the clasp is made of this.

Hopefully everybody can kinda see what I am talking about in your picture?

Thanks.
Jeffreyc87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 05:57 AM   #16
farscott
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Scott
Location: Dunedin, FL, USA
Posts: 134
I believe the clasp alloy has more copper compared to the rest of the bracelet to increase its durability. Copper atoms are smaller than gold atoms and help to strengthen the alloy, resulting is higher tensile strength.
farscott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 08:47 AM   #17
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,604
If were you would buy the $10k cheaper DD. My 18239 came on the older president with clasp (which was later dropped in favor of current concealed version). Not concerned at all about bracelet weight or wear, since as said above Rolex are built to last a lifetime. Actually like more the clasp version as length is adjustable






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 10:52 AM   #18
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Geezer View Post
$10K is nothing to sneeze at. That’s another watch. That said, I’ve shopped DDs recently and like the features of the newer model. Weight, ceramic inserts, etc give the new model a very nice feel on the wrist.
I want all to know that I'm reading (and re-reading) all posts and taking them to heart. Several worthy points being made on both sides of the argument. Lovely argument to have really... either way a DD will be back on the wrist.
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 02:48 PM   #19
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaijin View Post
My one and only DD was a Rose Gold "P", white dial with Romans. I went with the P as you said becuase I wanted the sold links.

I'd pass on the K cuz there has to be a weight difference right? But 10 K savings might sway me.

Paying off your house was the right move. I'm sure that has appreciated too.
Good point about the house. We've already bought and flipped one home, and then built another which we're now living in since that time. But nothing like getting that first one paid off!

Not sure if this is what you meant, but the weight is basically the same 30% heavier from P models on. K came after P, and the newer/older clasp didn't feel any different on my wrist on prior models I've owned. Can def tell a difference with the weight on 118238 vs. previous bracelet, but still the most comfortable watch I've worn. I'm basically wondering if those who've had them longer term and wore quite often had any qualms about the old clasp... and it's not sounding like it so far. I'm picking up the 118238 tomorrow morning if all goes well and will have wrist shots to share.
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2018, 02:51 PM   #20
RXAPPP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Blue Planet
Watch: 5
Posts: 1,201
Go big or go home
RXAPPP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 05:43 AM   #21
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chozn1 View Post
Good point about the house. We've already bought and flipped one home, and then built another which we're now living in since that time. But nothing like getting that first one paid off!

Not sure if this is what you meant, but the weight is basically the same 30% heavier from P models on. K came after P, and the newer/older clasp didn't feel any different on my wrist on prior models I've owned. Can def tell a difference with the weight on 118238 vs. previous bracelet, but still the most comfortable watch I've worn. I'm basically wondering if those who've had them longer term and wore quite often had any qualms about the old clasp... and it's not sounding like it so far. I'm picking up the 118238 tomorrow morning if all goes well and will have wrist shots to share.
Looking forward to shots of your DD. I picked up a mint 18238. I had a choice between the 18238 or the 118238. The upgrades on the six digit are great no doubt, but when I held both in hand I couldn't really feel the weight difference. Plus it was around 7K more for a more used 118238 vs the mint 18238 which also just had a Rolex service. Plus I couldn't resist the tapestry dial. In any event , ANY day date is special on the wrist. Congrats in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DD drive.JPG (75.9 KB, 433 views)
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 05:46 AM   #22
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffreyc87 View Post
The picture on the left, of the older DD models, illustrates something that I have brought up before but have been kinda shot down as wrong.

For a long time, on Rolex YG watches, especially DD, they made the clasps from a different color 18kt gold alloy...it looks more pinkish but not necessarily enough to be considered rose gold.

I have heard vintage collectors who agree with my observation call it "third color gold" and it is an 18kt gold alloy in btw yg and rg that is slightly more durable..hence.....the clasp is made of this.

Hopefully everybody can kinda see what I am talking about in your picture?

Thanks.
Yep my 18238 is the same. 18K gold is 75% gold and 25% other metals. In the five digit version they used a little more copper in the 25% for strength as you mentioned. I think it adds a little character to the watch.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 06:54 AM   #23
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
The deed is done, and I'm a happy man. I thank all again for their input. I ended up with more than $12k saved compared to a minty (but not new) 228235, and this watch just spoke to me in the end.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg rolex2 (3).jpg (239.5 KB, 402 views)
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 07:13 AM   #24
christo4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: kansas city
Posts: 171
very (!) pretty! ...looks like a nice tight bracelet, too.
christo4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 08:35 AM   #25
Jamesw20
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 156
Looks great. What model year? I’m trying to decide YG or platinum and rehaut or no.
Jamesw20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 09:40 AM   #26
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesw20 View Post
Looks great. What model year? I’m trying to decide YG or platinum and rehaut or no.
K serial 2001
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 09:50 AM   #27
Tangier11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Paul
Location: Southern Virginia
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 2,544
AWESOME CHOICE!! A big congrats!!!
Tangier11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 10:18 AM   #28
Chozn1
"TRF" Member
 
Chozn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South GA
Watch: Sub and President
Posts: 1,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by christo4 View Post
very (!) pretty! ...looks like a nice tight bracelet, too.
Thanks very much The band has been very well taken care of, and the watch is unpolished.
__________________
Current Models...
(K)Bluesy
(M) TT DJ
In search of DayDate
Prior models... Just about everything.
Chozn1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 11:24 AM   #29
Maiden
"TRF" Member
 
Maiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chozn1 View Post
The deed is done, and I'm a happy man. I thank all again for their input. I ended up with more than $12k saved compared to a minty (but not new) 228235, and this watch just spoke to me in the end.
Well done sir!
__________________
Rolex 116613LN
Rolex 16610LN
Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm
Omega Geneve
Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112
Orient Ray 2
Maiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2018, 11:30 AM   #30
enjoythemusic
2024 Pledge Member
 
enjoythemusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,446
Forget cost, get what you want and wear it daily. 20 years from now you'll be smiling.

As always...
__________________
__________________
“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson

Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.
enjoythemusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.