ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 January 2009, 05:22 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
pictures with new camera
thank you for all the help choosing my new camera folks
heres some pics with the canon eos 400d slr i need a dedicated macro lense but have done what i can with the lense i have i have managed to get the crown imprint on the crystal so im pleased but like i say i need a better macro lense please be gentle im a total amateur as can be seen from the pics |
7 January 2009, 01:24 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred
Location: KY, USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 10,002
|
b, thanks for showing us!
__________________
Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group |
8 January 2009, 12:42 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: N/a
Location: N/a
Watch: N/a
Posts: 55
|
Hi Shaggy,
Nice pics. Is that with the 18-55 lens, or did you change the package when you bought? I think you shot on AF, try it on MF and pick your plane of focus manually. You may be better with a zoom with Macro Facility, rather than a dedicated Macro Lens. Dedicated Macro Lenses are optimised for flat-field work, while you're really taking close-ups of small 3-d objects. That said, Canon does a nice 60mm Macro which is a nice short telephoto with your "C" sensor size. You may find that the 100mm Macro is a bit too long - more for "bug-hunting" than jewellery. What (I think) you DO need is a tripod (I prefer an offset-ball-head for close in work), a decent flashgun that you can bounce & swivel with, and an off-camera connecting cord to get the flash well away from the camera. If you think that watches suck you into spending money, then I wish your bank cards the best of luck in camera shops! Regards, Mike. |
8 January 2009, 02:19 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
they were taken with the 18-55 lense that came with it
i do have a tripod and used it i did have it on af though and did try to get it blurred round the edges where its focused if that makes sence? the first pic is meant to show the bezel around the 40 mark with the rest of the watch blurred the 2nd was trying to show the dial etc 4 & 5 were getting the crown in the crystal and if you zoom in you can see it kind of lol the last 2 were trying to get the rolex on the wall of the dial ive been looking at these for a bit of fun http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...MEWA:IT&ih=022 im not expecting anything professional with these for the money but thought they may be a learning/experimental tool? |
8 January 2009, 02:21 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
great shots of a lovely watch!!!
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
8 January 2009, 02:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
|
cheers
|
8 January 2009, 06:35 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in my house...
Posts: 5,524
|
Nice pictures...
|
9 January 2009, 12:05 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 46
|
Beautiful watch....
|
14 March 2009, 01:37 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
|
It works.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.