The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 March 2009, 02:25 AM   #1
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
YM to GMT IIc

I have been thinking of getting SS GMT IIc but everytime I think about I really don't need another watch. However, I do have this SS/Plat YM that doesn't really get a wrist time. I always find myself wearing my SS Subs and I also have a Tag AquaRacer Automatic Chrono Day/Date (love this watch) that I wear on a daily basis.

Would you sell the SS/Plat YM to accomodate the GMT IIc?

What says you?
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:31 AM   #2
Overkill
"TRF" Member
 
Overkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Youssef
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue
Posts: 925
Yes, I would personally much prefer the GMT-Master IIc to the SS/Platinum Yacht-Master.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 116700
Rolex Explorer 214270
Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue
IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08
Panerai Radiomir PAM183
Overkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:33 AM   #3
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overkill View Post
Yes, I would personally much prefer the GMT-Master IIc to the SS/Platinum Yacht-Master.
Care to give a reason?
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:45 AM   #4
tubojunk
"TRF" Member
 
tubojunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
If you would rather have a GMT2c to wear and do not need money to buy it, keep the YM. If you need money to buy it flip the YM since you said you hardly wear it.
__________________
Audemars 15707ce
Lange 191.032
Patek 5990/1a
Rolex 126610LN
tubojunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:49 AM   #5
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubojunk View Post
If you would rather have a GMT2c to wear and do not need money to buy it, keep the YM. If you need money to buy it flip the YM since you said you hardly wear it.
If I go ahead and buy the GMT2c, then the more the YM will not get any wrist time. If I do sell the YM, I have a feeling that I might regret later down the road. Hmmmmm....

Sometimes having a choice is not best thing in the world.
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:55 AM   #6
rescue7
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Rescueguy
Location: Here
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLODUCK View Post
I have been thinking of getting SS GMT IIc but everytime I think about I really don't need another watch. However, I do have this SS/Plat YM that doesn't really get a wrist time. I always find myself wearing my SS Subs and I also have a Tag AquaRacer Automatic Chrono Day/Date (love this watch) that I wear on a daily basis.

Would you sell the SS/Plat YM to accomodate the GMT IIc?

What says you?
How bout taking your S/S Plat YM to your local AD and do a comparison with the 2. Now you can judge and see for yourself which one looks better on your wrist.

Seeing you already have a S/S Sub I personally think the YM is a better fit, the Sub and GMT IIc and very similar in looks, but then again do you require the use of a second time zone watch? The Platinum YM has the same function as the Sub, but red writing and red second hand are killer.
rescue7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:01 AM   #7
Blimms
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Florida
Watch: Rolex/Breitling/BR
Posts: 200
I would keep the SS/PL YM. There is really nothing out there that looks like it. That YM just oozes class !!
Blimms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:07 AM   #8
Overkill
"TRF" Member
 
Overkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Youssef
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Watch: Milgauss Z-Blue
Posts: 925
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLODUCK View Post
Care to give a reason?
Well, apart from the fact that the GMT-Master IIc is more functional for me, I just prefer the look of it over that of the YM... but that's a matter of taste.
__________________
Rolex GMT-Master II 116700
Rolex Explorer 214270
Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Z-Blue
IWC Portuguese Hand Wound IW5454-08
Panerai Radiomir PAM183
Overkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:08 AM   #9
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blimms View Post
I would keep the SS/PL YM. There is really nothing out there that looks like it. That YM just oozes class !!
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:26 AM   #10
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by rescue7 View Post
Seeing you already have a S/S Sub I personally think the YM is a better fit, the Sub and GMT IIc and very similar in looks, but then again do you require the use of a second time zone watch? The Platinum YM has the same function as the Sub, but red writing and red second hand are killer.

Seems like I should sell my Subs instead. But I can't do that for sentimental reason. It is my very first Rolex I bought 19 years ago.
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:27 AM   #11
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blimms View Post
I would keep the SS/PL YM. There is really nothing out there that looks like it. That YM just oozes class !!

This is why I said that I have a feeling that if I sell it I might regret it down the road.
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:28 AM   #12
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLODUCK View Post
This is why I said that I have a feeling that if I sell it I might regret it down the road.
You most certainly will.

It's the most unique watch and the ONLY model with a full solid Platinum dial and bezel - none other quite like it.

Take my advice and hang on to it.......and start wearing and enjoying it like I do!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:29 AM   #13
Bebot
"TRF" Member
 
Bebot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Emil
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: U macallit
Posts: 2,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
You most certainly will.

It's the most unique watch and the ONLY model with a full solid Platinum dial and bezel - none other quite like it.

Take my advice and hang on to it.......and start wearing and enjoying it like I do!!

But I thought you always wear your bluesey?
Bebot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.