New Watches Up on RPR

[GBD]

Surely there will be additional releases, especially from Tudor. I can't imagine that's the extent of it.

The TT SD is really a head-scratcher. Why take the tooliest watch in the lineup and tart it up?

[chris975d]

Originally Posted by samson66

The 12:00 marker on the teaser is elongated as compared to the markers around it. On this photo it is the exact same length. I still think this is a photoshopped Bucherer

I’m referring to this model:

[abozz]

RPR are a wondeful page but I hope is wrong this time.

[samson66]

Originally Posted by chris975d

I’m referring to this model:

OK I see what you mean. I was only looking at the Black Bays. God I hope this isn't it from Tudor.

[scurfa]

If it is I’ll be off the list!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[chris975d]

Originally Posted by samson66

OK I see what you mean. I was only looking at the Black Bays. God I hope this isn't it from Tudor.

I’m afraid to say it, but I think this model aligns with two of the Tudor teasers...the 12:00 marker, and the teaser of a safe door. The bezel of this being what the safe door references.

[GoingPlaces]

He's far from consistent. I will wait on official release to comment.

[strettyend]

If true this is incredibly weak

[samson66]

Originally Posted by chris975d

I’m afraid to say it, but I think this model aligns with two of the Tudor teasers...the 12:00 marker, and the teaser of a safe door. The bezel of this being what the safe door references.

The odd end links on the strap may even align with the other teaser. Perhaps it comes with a rubber strap with some sort of quick release?

[_speedmaster_]

Pretty lackluster year if true. I guess with the already long waitlists on existing models, there's no need to introduce something like a RONR or SS sub with a new movement.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by chris975d

I’m afraid to say it, but I think this model aligns with two of the Tudor teasers...the 12:00 marker, and the teaser of a safe door. The bezel of this being what the safe door references.

i thought the crown was at 3 in those teasers but i guess i was wrong. oh well.

[jrs146]

Batman in jubilee... how original... not!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[jaydav2306]

LOL idiot blocked me for having an opinion

[CaryTheLabelGuy]

Man, not sure what to think at this point. The BLNR on jubilee is meh for me. Why both the BLRO and BLNR on the same bracelet? Having the two different bracelets made much more sense if you’re going to keep the BLNR around.

This might actually drive the price up on the old BLNR if true and will probably bring the price of the BLRO down.

[NWNL]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Meteorite dial on a GMT ... let’s make it more difficult to read

Haha Rolex wants to sell all those old whitegold casings

[scurfa]

All the Tudor’s are correct, not sure how the Navy prototype will go down


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[_speedmaster_]

Also, I don't get making the YM larger. The whole point of that watch is to be a more elegant sports watch. Making it 2mm larger than a sub makes little sense to me.

[TimeToWatch]

Originally Posted by jaydav2306

LOL idiot blocked me for having an opinion

He blocks anyone for calling out his fake news on the blnr. The fact that people trust this guy at all is laughable. He’s at best a market manipulator.

[DasKptl]

Originally Posted by _speedmaster_

Also, I don't get making the YM larger. The whole point of that watch is to be a more elegant sports watch. Making it 2mm larger than a sub makes little sense to me.

That was my thought, exactly.

[avega357]

I do not like any of them



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[torifile]

Originally Posted by Etschell

https://www.instagram.com/rolexpassionreport/?hl=en

Batman prices will now drop.

Good. I’ve been really interested in one but I won’t pay the premium.

[SPMN]

I can’t imagine the Tudor’s are right. I could see them launching these watches, but there’s no must-have pieces there. No utilization of the BB58 case, no other color ways for the gmt...I think this is similar to last year when they launched the 1926 line the day before Basel and then launched their heavy hitters on the floor.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by scurfa

All the Tudor’s are correct, not sure how the Navy prototype will go down


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

for those who dont know like me:

[samson66]

Originally Posted by _speedmaster_

Also, I don't get making the YM larger. The whole point of that watch is to be a more elegant sports watch. Making it 2mm larger than a sub makes little sense to me.

Slow seller. Trying to move it into a different category I guess. Of the bunch it is the one I would be most likely to purchase, as I prefer >40mm sport watches.

[G.D.BeanCounter]

Unimpressed

[Finslayer83]

Originally Posted by chris975d

I’m referring to this model:

This not the Tudor sub I was looking for.

gross.

[Etschell]

Originally Posted by Finslayer83

This not the Tudor sub I was looking for.

gross.

yep although thre is a quick change strap system integrated.

[Psmith]

YM 42 would be nice, if real, esp with a choice of strap/bracelet.

[scurfa]

Originally Posted by SPMN

I can’t imagine the Tudor’s are right. I could see them launching these watches, but there’s no must-have pieces there. No utilization of the BB58 case, no other color ways for the gmt...I think this is similar to last year when they launched the 1926 line the day before Basel and then launched their heavy hitters on the floor.

sorry to say they are right

[Art 1]

I has never heard of this rpr person.