The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 March 2018, 12:58 AM   #31
Rachdanon
"TRF" Member
 
Rachdanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Singapore
Posts: 266
+1 to above
Rachdanon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2018, 04:22 AM   #32
Jster
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
The 15300 is much better proportioned.

The 15300 has a better bezel to dial ratio. The 15400 wears big. I also like how the 15300 has the AP logo as the 12 marker.
Jster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2018, 04:56 AM   #33
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jster View Post
The 15300 has a better bezel to dial ratio. The 15400 wears big. I also like how the 15300 has the AP logo as the 12 marker.
I don't know I think the 300 is a little bit bezel heavy, 41 a little dial heavy, so TBH I think a 40mm would be the Goldilocks of this line.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2018, 08:38 AM   #34
Gigaton Punch
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
I tried a 15300. It’s not so much that the lugs flare out. It's the plots and first link that are stiff, which don’t allow for a good hug on thin wrists like mine. I wonder how the 15450 would fit?
I guess that's a more accurate description. I was surprised that the 15300 did not fit as well as I'd hoped, considering that it's 39 mm. But I never read about this, so I wonder if I'm the only one...
Gigaton Punch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2018, 08:59 AM   #35
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gigaton Punch View Post
I guess that's a more accurate description. I was surprised that the 15300 did not fit as well as I'd hoped, considering that it's 39 mm. But I never read about this, so I wonder if I'm the only one...
Yeah, we are on the same page! The 15300 fits borderline okay on my wrist. I’m thinking the 15450 would be a nice fit...
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 March 2018, 09:00 AM   #36
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,246
I prefer the dial on the 15400
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2018, 06:37 PM   #37
Xeer
"TRF" Member
 
Xeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Singapore
Posts: 179
15300 or 15202 > 15400

The prices for 15300s though... starting to change the conversation.
Xeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 12:11 AM   #38
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeer View Post
15300 or 15202 > 15400

The prices for 15300s though... starting to change the conversation.


Much less of them on the market and far few in near mint or mint condition. Likely to get worse, glad I got my 15300 when I did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
V25V is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 12:49 AM   #39
soran
"TRF" Member
 
soran's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: wait list
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 551
I think the 15300 would be a perfect fit
soran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 01:53 AM   #40
yoast
"TRF" Member
 
yoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,261
15300
__________________
IG: @yoast.watch
https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/
yoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 03:05 AM   #41
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,180
AP are kind of genius for making the 15202 the "goldilocks" size and proportion. From their standpoint it makes sense not to have a standard RO in the same size as the Jumbo. Anyone who finds the 15400 too large and the 15450 too small (and can't find a 15300) gets funneled into the 15202.

I always thought it was kind of funny that they made the 15300 the same size as the Jumbo.
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 03:13 AM   #42
wach16
"TRF" Member
 
wach16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,116
15300 for sure
__________________

Rolex 228239
PAM00684
wach16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 03:46 AM   #43
Takonwong
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 404
15400 for me
Takonwong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2018, 05:07 AM   #44
Xerxes77
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
15400
Xerxes77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2018, 09:13 PM   #45
Trulli
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Tellus
Watch: 5711
Posts: 18
15300 for sure. 15400 is to big.
Trulli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 March 2018, 12:40 AM   #46
ezinhk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
15400 is doable

15450 is unisex watch - good choice if you plan to share with your wife or gf
ezinhk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.