The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 January 2012, 10:34 AM   #1
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
Perfect Panerai Duo

Hey guys,

I am trying to limit myself to only 2 PAMs.

What would be your ideal pair or duo?

I thinking 104 and 24. Or possibly 104 and 210?

Lets hear your thoughts and see your pics!!!


John
__________________

John
Submariner C LN
Explorer 42 Polar
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 10:35 AM   #2
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
000 and 210.

Historical and DNA

esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 10:45 AM   #3
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
Either Eric's call or you can get one with a sec hand for variety. That said, I love the bases so if only two in that range, I'd do the 210/000, but I'm not going to limit myself to just two!



__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 11:11 AM   #4
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by esm View Post
000 and 210.

Historical and DNA


Perfect suggestion!
red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 11:12 AM   #5
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Either Eric's call or you can get one with a sec hand for variety. That said, I love the bases so if only two in that range, I'd do the 210/000, but I'm not going to limit myself to just two!




Love that 190 Mik! One day, I will get one... well, I hope the wifemaster let's me!
red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 11:15 AM   #6
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,500
Well, without breaking the bank.. how about this Rad(380) and Sub(25) combo!






red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 11:46 AM   #7
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
I'm a Luminor chap, so I would suggest one Luminor case and one Luminor 1950 case. Perhaps one manual wind and one automatic. I also favour sandwich dials and small seconds, so would probably go for 111 and 312/320
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 12:09 PM   #8
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,443
if i were to get 2 pams. i would get one historic and one inhouse (maybe the 8 day power reserve)
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 12:26 PM   #9
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,608
127/249
372/425
372/448
422/449

etc.

Breaks the bank,but we are sticking to two ....I can live with a duo like that.
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 01:56 PM   #10
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
No Submersible love??!!
__________________

John
Submariner C LN
Explorer 42 Polar
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 02:05 PM   #11
bcacncnc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,577
What a tough choice. Well, on the Rad side, the decision is quite easy... 210 - without a doubt. Great DNA, great value, and if you choose to mod the hands to gold hands one day like Mik - looks amazing.

On the Luminor side - well many options. If the 312 fits you, then that would be a nice complement to the 210.

The two I have are 000 and the 233.
__________________
Omega
Panerai
Chopard
Grand Seiko
bcacncnc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 02:20 PM   #12
snowpea
"TRF" Member
 
snowpea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steven
Location: Jazoom
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,092
I'm in the same boat only want 2 pams, just pickup the 312 now just waiting on that 388 Rad.
__________________
snowpea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 06:28 PM   #13
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,499
just two? impossible....
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 07:04 PM   #14
Fiddy
"TRF" Member
 
Fiddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Asia
Watch: PP AP PAM ROLEX
Posts: 495
If I can have only 2 Pams, I would go for 372 and 232.
__________________
TRF AP OWNERS CLUB
Fiddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 January 2012, 10:23 PM   #15
zeroshiki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: paul
Location: surabaya
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
just two? impossible....
+1
zeroshiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 12:18 AM   #16
eric23
"TRF" Member
 
eric23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
MY dream Duo

233/372
eric23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 12:51 AM   #17
tonydaniel
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Forest
Posts: 19
I would do a submersible for casual days and either a 312 or a 233 for when I want to be a bit dressy.
tonydaniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 01:20 AM   #18
watchdaddy1
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: William
Location: Az
Watch: strap whore
Posts: 1,194
U can't limit yourself when it comes to OP- They r like a drug -ADDICTIVE & Impossible to to release it's hold it has .

watchdaddy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 01:22 AM   #19
MP5
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,881
LOVE the 000, 210 suggestion!
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 02:20 AM   #20
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
372 / 425 or 190
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 06:22 AM   #21
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
My "other perfect duo" would be either the 127/249 or 372/448
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 02:11 PM   #22
Fearsome Puppy
"TRF" Member
 
Fearsome Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
Here's my two for consideration...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1327464660.478539.jpg (67.8 KB, 332 views)
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fearsome Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 02:13 PM   #23
Fearsome Puppy
"TRF" Member
 
Fearsome Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880


Meant these two...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fearsome Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 02:42 PM   #24
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fearsome Puppy View Post


Meant these two...
__________________

John
Submariner C LN
Explorer 42 Polar
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2012, 04:35 PM   #25
JohnyMac
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: California
Watch: 116520
Posts: 17
A pair of modern classics as a consideration....

Here is what seems to be working for me - for right now anyhow

312 - which nearly everyone is familiar with, and a perhaps slightly lesser known 323 - 10 day in house movement, GMT, 47 mm (case size of a 232 w/ the case thickness of a 190)

Here is a quick pic with them both dressed in Mauser Ammos....

Good luck with your search! The good news is that there are no wrong answers. Go with what speaks to you the loudest.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0829.jpg (53.3 KB, 314 views)
JohnyMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2012, 03:18 PM   #26
Rollie2011
"TRF" Member
 
Rollie2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnyMac View Post
Here is what seems to be working for me - for right now anyhow

312 - which nearly everyone is familiar with, and a perhaps slightly lesser known 323 - 10 day in house movement, GMT, 47 mm (case size of a 232 w/ the case thickness of a 190)

Here is a quick pic with them both dressed in Mauser Ammos....

Good luck with your search! The good news is that there are no wrong answers. Go with what speaks to you the loudest.
RIght now the Sub 24 is singing!!
__________________

John
Submariner C LN
Explorer 42 Polar
Rollie2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2012, 01:58 PM   #27
Carlo Miguel
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlo
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 444
233 and 190 for me
Carlo Miguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2012, 02:15 PM   #28
Turkeyboy
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
Quote:
Originally Posted by B. Doggy View Post
372 / 425 or 190
I'm liking the way you're thinking...........425 for a Rad and I'll stick with my 416 for a Luminor.......I'm happy with that and didn't break the bank!!!!!!!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg p4.jpg (68.1 KB, 213 views)
Turkeyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 January 2012, 03:30 PM   #29
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by esm View Post
My "other perfect duo" would be either the 127/249 or 372/448
Have the 372 and 249 127 expensive and difficult to source in my part of the wood.448/449 part of the "Boutique only" rubbish Therefore,for next year a 422 and 425 would go down better than Dom Perignon .... Oh and a DD II in YG too ...
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 January 2012, 12:25 AM   #30
Explorertwo
"TRF" Member
 
Explorertwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Lowlands
Watch: White 'n Black
Posts: 641
My dream duo: 111 and 232... i' m half way......
Nice combo's guys!!
Explorertwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.