Two for one, what do you guys think.

[thui0708]

I have been wanting a 116500 in black for the longest time and as everyone know, the grey market price has skyrocket. Just want you guys opinion, I have a 116610LV 2013 and 116710BLNR 2017 with both box and paper. Will you trade both of these watches for 116500LN? let me know what you guys think.
also, I will also have a 116600 that I must keep since this was a present from my wife.

[dualcarb]

No, those are three watches that I can happily keep in rotation. A SubC LV and BLNR for a black DaytonaC is not a good exchange.

[Heff]

I have the LV and BLNR as well and I wouldn’t consider doing this trade. They are both fantastic pieces. But then again, I am not a huge fan of the Daytona.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mas12]

Hard pass. Just wait it out or save to pay the premium. The LV and BLNR are too awesome to unload on one Daytona.

[GolfJunkie]

There's no way I would trade those two watches for a Daytona.

[oldman2005]

Sometimes two are better than one. I don't think I will trade my GMT and LV for my Daytona

[indy16zo6]

I would not make that trade personally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Chloe&Harley]

I wouldn't trading two desirable for a single desirable watch , the only winner on this is the person or dealer (which is worse) you are trading with

[-Ally-]

I would not.

I have owned all three, although now only have the Daytona and BLNR.

[subprimero]

No.

[Brny11]

I’d maybe trade one if you had that burning desire. But you have an insane 3 watch collection. I just couldn’t make that trade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[gmac]

I have both BLNR and LV and like each better than any Daytona.

[huncho]

absolutely not

[thui0708]

Appreciated with all these feedback and that is what I thought everyone will say. I should hold on the LV and BLNR for now. Just curious, do you guys think 116520 is a good option if I need to sale / trade of one this watch plus US$4000.

[RichM]

Originally Posted by thui0708

Appreciated with all these feedback and that is what I thought everyone will say. I should hold on the LV and BLNR for now. Just curious, do you guys think 116520 is a good option if I need to sale / trade of one this watch plus US$4000.

Smart move and no on the 116520. You want the 500. Don’t settle for less.

[jenedla]

Lots of “no” here, but just because some think these two are more desirable than the Daytona is irrelevant. If you are keen to do it, go for it. Life is too short to not get and wear what you love. Just be sure you love it.

[maylebox]

Nope I would only do that deal if I was the DaytonaC owner trading for your watches.

[JR16]

I wouldn’t do any of the above deals / trades .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[JayHantz]

Originally Posted by Rich Mickol

Smart move and no on the 116520. You want the 500. Don’t settle for less.

Exactly. Be patient!

[mml4]

No to the trade!

[brandrea]

Personally I wouldn’t even trade the LV straight up, but I know I’d be in the minority

[Robadob]

I have to echo the majority here and say that, to me, would be a terrible trade. Save and buy the Daytona at a later stage.

[thui0708]

Appreciate with all feedback. I will hold until I can find and save enough for the 500.

[nick800]

Nope

[rmlovett1]

I’m a huge Daytona fan....save and trade one...yes. Trade those two for a SS Daytona...no. PM Daytona, different conversation.

[watchwatcher]

Not a fan of twofers...and especially not for another steel watch.

As Rich said, if we're talking PM, different story.

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by Richris1

I’m a huge Daytona fan....save and trade one...yes. Trade those two for a SS Daytona...no. PM Daytona, different conversation.

I agree; better to go after a PM on an o-flex bracelet.

[dkg1616]

Hold out for retail! You will regret it after 6 months!

[doboy007]

I too have both and I personally wouldn’t. If it was for the WG OF then maybe :)

[donas]

No way!!