The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 February 2019, 10:39 PM   #1
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
AP ROO Diver on small wrist

Hi. I am considering the AP ROO Diver. My wrist size is 6.25 inches.

Any ROO Divers with small wrists out there?

FYI, I currently own the SubC and the PP 5711/1a and they both fit me fine. I heard that these ROO cases wear really big.

Thanks in advance.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2019, 10:48 PM   #2
Flex368
"TRF" Member
 
Flex368's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Felix
Location: GMT +1
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 2,974
I also wear SubC and 5711, both are a great fit for my wrist which is slightly larger than yours, but still quite small.

AP ROOs (42mm) simply look ridiculously large on my wrist.

Pics when I tried AP a few years ago:





Flex368 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2019, 10:57 PM   #3
jay_kay
"TRF" Member
 
jay_kay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
I used to have a 15703ST Diver. In the end, I admitted it was just too big. I am much happier now with my 5167A on rubber and a 36mm 14790 AP RO 6.75" wrist BTW
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
jay_kay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2019, 11:05 PM   #4
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flex368 View Post
I also wear SubC and 5711, both are a great fit for my wrist which is slightly larger than yours, but still quite small.

AP ROOs (42mm) simply look ridiculously large on my wrist.

Pics when I tried AP a few years ago:





Thank you for your pics and insight. Exactly what I was looking for.

Maybe I should consider something else.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2019, 11:17 PM   #5
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay_kay View Post
I used to have a 15703ST Diver. In the end, I admitted it was just too big. I am much happier now with my 5167A on rubber and a 36mm 14790 AP RO 6.75" wrist BTW
Thanks for the reply. I might go and try the 15450 37mm ROO out for size.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 February 2019, 11:25 PM   #6
Flex368
"TRF" Member
 
Flex368's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Felix
Location: GMT +1
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppalasthira View Post
Thank you for your pics and insight. Exactly what I was looking for.

Maybe I should consider something else.
Glad I could help.

Yes, you probably should. Good luck, there are so many nice watches out there.
Flex368 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 12:59 AM   #7
brandnew2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 24
Just chiming in, my wrist is around your size, if not slightly smaller. I have a 15450 and a 5167A, both of which I can comfortably wear. I’ve also had many opportunities to try on a 5711 and it works fine. But the 42MM ROOs just swallow my wrist - way too big. I’ve tried to talk myself into it many times and it just doesn’t work.
brandnew2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 01:23 AM   #8
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
I have a 7" wrist and starting to find the offshores too big. I had 3 of them and down to 1 now.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 04:01 AM   #9
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,634
6.5” wrist here - aquanaut shot too for comparison.

I think equally important to wrist size is forearm and body size too. It’s a largish watch, but don’t feel it’s too big ever.



__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 05:05 AM   #10
duc888
"TRF" Member
 
duc888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Germany
Posts: 860
The aquanaut looks very fine on your wrist......you should buy it
duc888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 05:09 AM   #11
MichelleP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppalasthira View Post
Thanks for the reply. I might go and try the 15450 37mm ROO out for size.
I think the 15450 would be perfect. I have the same size wrist and picked one up in December.
MichelleP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 06:17 AM   #12
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by duc888 View Post
The aquanaut looks very fine on your wrist......you should buy it


It was my lead option at one point before I tried on the diver - I just felt a bit underwhelmed by it on the wrist. I think too much flat brushed bezel surface, and not enough going on visually for me with the dial and rest of the case. Also I do very much like having the ability to tighten or loosen the strap by a notch during the day as needed.

Even despite the massive gain in resale value of the Patek, I would still make the same decision again as I haven’t tried on anything more perfect for me than my 15710.

The only other watch i would like at the moment is an exp1 but I also know I would hardly ever wear it, as I would want to put it on rubber and it just wouldn’t get a fair share of wrist time vs. the AP.

A complicated sports PP or the new black/red CE bezel 42 ROO would probably be about the only thing which could displace the diver in future but for now I am very much luxuriously satisfied :)
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 08:42 AM   #13
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,372
6.5" wrist..had the Diver for two months..invested in a short strap and tried various combinations of strap length to make it sit right..
and it wore HUGE for 42mm on a rubber strap even..and I come from Panerai...
ultimately...move it on...
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 08:48 AM   #14
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burlington View Post
6.5” wrist here - aquanaut shot too for comparison.

I think equally important to wrist size is forearm and body size too. It’s a largish watch, but don’t feel it’s too big ever.





I think the angles you are shooting at are misleading. The aquanaut looks larger on your wrist than the diver, which is insane. Clearly you having the diver angled is making it appear smaller on you than it is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 08:53 AM   #15
yoast
"TRF" Member
 
yoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,257
7 and a quarter inch wrist here, sold the diver and the rest of my offshores as I’m used to Patek now, the offshores are way too bulky for me now...

Some pics for comparison:

Diver


Elephant


Tour auto limited edition


Trulli, 5712 and 15300 compared


Hope that helps
__________________
IG: @yoast.watch
https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/
yoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 08:55 AM   #16
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
AP ROO Diver on small wrist

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
7 and a quarter inch wrist here, sold the diver and the rest of my offshores as I’m used to Patek now, the offshores are way too bulky for me now...

Some pics for comparison:

Diver


Elephant


Tour auto limited edition


Trulli, 5712 and 15300 compared


Hope that helps


I'm headed in the same direction..... never thought I would be doing it.

Your old 15300 will likely stay however.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 09:05 AM   #17
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandnew2 View Post
Just chiming in, my wrist is around your size, if not slightly smaller. I have a 15450 and a 5167A, both of which I can comfortably wear. I’ve also had many opportunities to try on a 5711 and it works fine. But the 42MM ROOs just swallow my wrist - way too big. I’ve tried to talk myself into it many times and it just doesn’t work.
I will definitely go and try the 15450.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 09:06 AM   #18
yoast
"TRF" Member
 
yoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by V25V View Post

Your old 15300 will likely stay however.
The one that got away.....
__________________
IG: @yoast.watch
https://www.instagram.com/yoast.watch/
yoast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 09:08 AM   #19
V25V
2024 Pledge Member
 
V25V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
The one that got away.....


She is being well taken care of over here!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
V25V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 10:02 AM   #20
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,220
Probably too big unless you have flat wrists which sort of add half an inch to your wrist span so you'd be like a 6.75. Might be the thickness is an issue for you compared to the others you have, so don't expect it to be as flat.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 11:17 AM   #21
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by V25V View Post
I have a 7" wrist and starting to find the offshores too big. I had 3 of them and down to 1 now.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Thanks for chiming in. That ROO FC Diver is an absolute killer.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 12:11 PM   #22
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burlington View Post
6.5” wrist here - aquanaut shot too for comparison.

I think equally important to wrist size is forearm and body size too. It’s a largish watch, but don’t feel it’s too big ever.



Looks good on you.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 12:17 PM   #23
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
7 and a quarter inch wrist here, sold the diver and the rest of my offshores as I’m used to Patek now, the offshores are way too bulky for me now...

Some pics for comparison:

Diver


Elephant


Tour auto limited edition


Trulli, 5712 and 15300 compared


Hope that helps
Thanks for sharing.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 12:24 PM   #24
porschejeff
"TRF" Member
 
porschejeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Michigan
Watch: DD 228238
Posts: 2,456
I'm a big guy 6'2, 220 I have the 15710 which I love, but it does wear big even on my wrist.
__________________
Rolex DD 228238
Daytona 116515 (sold)
AP 15710
Rolex 116710 BLNR
And a few others...
porschejeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 03:11 PM   #25
Burlington
"TRF" Member
 
Burlington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by V25V View Post
I think the angles you are shooting at are misleading. The aquanaut looks larger on your wrist than the diver, which is insane. Clearly you having the diver angled is making it appear smaller on you than it is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro




Good point about the angles, this is probably the photo I’ve got where it looks the largest but still isn’t quite centred on my wrist due to my tendency to wear it a little loose.

It is for sure a considerably bigger & heavier watch in all dimensions than the aquanaut, what the photos don’t show are the svelteness of the Patek.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.”

― Winston S. Churchill
Burlington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 03:15 PM   #26
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 25,987
My experience was the diver fit very much like the sea dweller. 16600
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 04:36 PM   #27
S4one
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: California
Posts: 48
I have a driver and they indeed are large. You need to find the perfect fit since it's really top heavy. I've been wearing my Batman which is easier to wear. Also if you have small arms, the wide width of the rubber straps on the diver might bother you, it still bothers me. Kinda wish they used a tapered strap.

I guess the diver is a "divers" watch and is meant to be worn over a wet suit, hence the wide straps.
S4one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 05:08 PM   #28
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burlington View Post


Good point about the angles, this is probably the photo I’ve got where it looks the largest but still isn’t quite centred on my wrist due to my tendency to wear it a little loose.

It is for sure a considerably bigger & heavier watch in all dimensions than the aquanaut, what the photos don’t show are the svelteness of the Patek.
From this angle, the diver looks kinda big. What size wrist do you have?
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 06:22 PM   #29
Flex368
"TRF" Member
 
Flex368's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Felix
Location: GMT +1
Watch: Yes!
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppalasthira View Post
From this angle, the diver looks kinda big. What size wrist do you have?
He stated 6.5" in post #9.
Flex368 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 February 2019, 09:25 PM   #30
strettyend
"TRF" Member
 
strettyend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoast View Post
7 and a quarter inch wrist here, sold the diver and the rest of my offshores as I’m used to Patek now, the offshores are way too bulky for me now...

Some pics for comparison:


Trulli, 5712 and 15300 compared


Hope that helps
Wow the 5712 looks big here
__________________
AP ROC 26315or; AP RO 15450st; Vacheron Fiftysix; Day Date RG 228235 Olive; Daytona YG 116528; Daytona YG Oysterflex 116518; Cartier Santos de Cartier Rose Gold; Panerai PAM 0048; IWC Portofino Chrono; Girard-Perregaux Richeville
strettyend is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.