ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Calatrava r · 27 June 2018, 03:31 AM

The PP is the way to go. And you can pass it on to the next generation, an added bonus.

scrappy · 27 June 2018, 06:34 AM

Daytona

HorologyK · 27 June 2018, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vipes

This. To me, the SS Daytona looks better. The WG Daytona is really nice but I can’t get pass the Oysterflex; just doesn’t look as good as the Oyster bracelet. The 5164 looks right on the tropical strap.

Rolex over engineered the Oysterflex IMO.

Fard · 27 June 2018, 09:59 PM

Patek for the name.

Rolexavidfan · 27 June 2018, 11:28 PM

WG Daytona and 5164a can co-exist.

lapince · 28 June 2018, 06:06 AM

Of course in 30 years the Rolex will look much better than the Patek and you need worry much less about scratches on the Rolex, but the PP is at a other level and is high horology, Rolex just isn’t and they are not trying to compete in any way with AP or PP, if you want a worry free watch which will look great in 30 years the Rolex is a winner, if you want a high horology piece with incredible agtention to details, then the PP is the winner

27 June 2018, 11:28 PM	#35
Rolexavidfan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Har Location: Tukwila, WA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,568	WG Daytona and 5164a can co-exist. __________________ Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Rolex Go for the timepiece you love. You will save more. ...

27 June 2018, 03:31 AM	#31
Calatrava r 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2017 Location: United States Watch: Rolex and Patek Posts: 10,595	The PP is the way to go. And you can pass it on to the next generation, an added bonus.

27 June 2018, 06:34 AM	#32
scrappy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 623	Daytona

27 June 2018, 09:59 PM	#34
Fard Banned Join Date: Jun 2018 Location: Where I live Posts: 34	Patek for the name.

28 June 2018, 06:06 AM	#36
lapince "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Mars Watch: 5712 Posts: 11,509	Of course in 30 years the Rolex will look much better than the Patek and you need worry much less about scratches on the Rolex, but the PP is at a other level and is high horology, Rolex just isn’t and they are not trying to compete in any way with AP or PP, if you want a worry free watch which will look great in 30 years the Rolex is a winner, if you want a high horology piece with incredible agtention to details, then the PP is the winner

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)