ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 August 2012, 08:39 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in the sky
Posts: 208
|
390 for sub C
Will you sell the 390 for sub C? Current collection: 232,372,390
Thanks in advance |
30 August 2012, 10:40 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel Leeds
Location: Suburbs of DC
Watch: Rolex,AP,PAM,etc..
Posts: 306
|
No, from the models you have listed above I would sell the 390 last.
-Daniel |
30 August 2012, 10:41 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
Not a chance. That being said, the 390 is my favorite PAM model.
|
30 August 2012, 10:46 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,371
|
I will be the contrarian...
is your wrist good with the 47mm? if so I see the 232 and 372 taking up your Panerai wrist time... while I love the 390..I just feel that the 372 is just a bit more watch (SE or not).. Your mileage will vary...
__________________
too much into watches... |
30 August 2012, 10:50 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,149
|
I have both watches. It's strictly personal preference, but I'd do it. I like the gold hands on the 390 but otherwise not bonding with it that much. I'm back to wearing my 177 most of the time.
For me the Sub-C is more of a foundation piece that can be worn every day. |
30 August 2012, 11:20 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
no don't do it
|
30 August 2012, 11:41 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
I have the three PAMs in question and would agree with Phil...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
30 August 2012, 11:49 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
|
Go for it! It wil give some variety to your collection.
BTW- Are you OK with the size of the SubC? After wearing 47mm PAMs it will feel tiny on your wrist. |
31 August 2012, 12:01 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
to me, 390 is a keeper.
__________________
member#3242 |
31 August 2012, 12:06 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
I wouldn't. The 390 is a great reference.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
31 August 2012, 12:07 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Just curious as to why you are considering selling the 390 out of the three you have... is it getting the least wrist time?
__________________
|
31 August 2012, 01:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: ON
Watch: GMTIIC, Sub Hulk
Posts: 90
|
Don't do it. The 390 is amazing but if it's not getting enough wrist time...then do it. Both are beautiful watches
|
31 August 2012, 01:32 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Thousand Oaks
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,017
|
I have 2 Pams.......a 425 and a 416........simply love Panerai!!!! That being said, that trade is a no brainer.............you gotta get that Sub!!!!
|
31 August 2012, 02:20 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: A.K.W
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Me Watching U
Posts: 587
|
Dont break up that trifecta. It's already perfect.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.