ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 April 2018, 01:07 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,376
|
|
18 April 2018, 01:12 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,031
|
I like the 15400 on your wrist. The fit for me was similar when I tried them on, and I think the wrist shots tend to magnify the size of the dial. My wife is pretty petite and typically sports a 26mm DJ. She tried on a 15451 and loved the fit. It depends on the look your going for, but in my opinion as long as there is no lug overhang, and the bracelet hugs the sides of your wrist without a gap, the fit is as intended in the design.
|
19 April 2018, 11:02 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 95
|
i'd vote for the 15450. IMHO the royal oak was designed to see some bracelet from the top view, rather than just the watch head covering the wrist.
|
19 April 2018, 11:17 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,629
|
Good point
__________________
Adam |
19 April 2018, 11:23 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,484
|
I prefer the 450 on your wrist
|
19 April 2018, 11:39 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Watch: ROO
Posts: 1,040
|
my worst <7 and I wear a 44 just fine..you a big guy - go 41mm at a min
__________________
41mm SS ROC blue dial |
19 April 2018, 10:43 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
400 is a little big but doesn’t look bad on you. Buy whichever one you like, is your money.
|
20 April 2018, 04:22 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,990
|
Quote:
The 15400 definitely doesn't look bad on you, and you could pull it off, but the 15450 looks a much better fit IMO. A jumbo or 15300 may work as well, but between these two, the 15450 has much nicer proportions on your wrists i'd say. A nice problem to have deciding between the two! |
|
20 April 2018, 08:14 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
|
400- it's supposed to a little big. The 39 mm 5402 was considered over sized in the 70's, hence the jumbo, and this is the modern interpretation .
|
20 April 2018, 10:22 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: US
Posts: 67
|
15400 looks good on you. Not too big at all. 450 looks too small.
|
20 April 2018, 10:24 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,391
|
It looks good on your wrist.
|
3 August 2018, 02:36 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 139
|
15400
|
3 August 2018, 02:41 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Montreal
Posts: 27
|
All looks good!!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.