The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 20 October 2017, 12:03 PM   #1
jesseB13
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: Rolex Sub
Posts: 5
ND Ceramic Sub for New Explorer?

Hey Everyone,

One of first posts...I have seen a bunch of other threads of people debating which watch to go with. I Wanted to get everyone's opinions on trading my 1.5yr old ND Ceramic Sub that I bought new from AD for a New Lume Explorer 39mm? I love my Sub, however at times feel it's a bit much...not to mention I see them all the time. Am I crazy to trade the Sub for Explorer? Something kind of cool and understated about the Explorer. As much as I love the Sub, it is definitely not subtle lol Thoughts? Thanks!!
jesseB13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 12:17 PM   #2
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
I used to own the ND Sub and now own the new Explorer. Both are great. The Explorer is definitely a more subtle watch.

I would not trade, though. Save up and buy the Explorer. Sub + Explorer = great combo!
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 12:21 PM   #3
Atlantic
"TRF" Member
 
Atlantic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: At Sea
Posts: 394
Keep the Sub!
Atlantic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 12:38 PM   #4
Daryl
2024 Pledge Member
 
Daryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 3,339
Keep the Sub..
__________________
2FA-Enabled


Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Daryl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 01:20 PM   #5
GB-man
2024 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 36,815
I wouldn't but if you don't feel comfortable in the sub then do it!
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 07:13 PM   #6
geebob
"TRF" Member
 
geebob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Here
Watch: SpeedyPro Explorer
Posts: 235
IMO, not crazy at all
I would not trade it, I would save up and get the Explorer. However, if you’re not going to wear it, cause you’re bored with it for instance, then IMHO you should trade it. There’s no point in keeping it, if you no longer like it/enjoy it.
geebob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 07:58 PM   #7
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
I used to own the ND Sub and now own the new Explorer. Both are great. The Explorer is definitely a more subtle watch.

I would not trade, though. Save up and buy the Explorer. Sub + Explorer = great combo!
Same. Own both as well, but would not trade one for the other.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:08 PM   #8
jesseB13
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: Rolex Sub
Posts: 5
I appreciate the comments, was definitely looking for you guys to say pull the trigger...but apparently you all are smart and not impulsive...so, I will keep the Sub and save for the Explorer. (kind of knew answer but was hoping for bad advice from you all lol). Thanks for the input!! I guess next is the Explorer unless any of you all have additional suggestions in that price range? I like IWC, but not sure if it's worth it for watch like Inteneur or Mark etc...especially since they aren't in house...may as well go w/ Sinn for less? any thoughts on mixing it up...? looking for a little less of a diver and more versatile...Explorer is no brainer, but....Thoughts? Thanks in advance!
jesseB13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 09:12 PM   #9
1William
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,325
Both are great watches but I would keep the Sub. Look at the Tudor Ranger, looks very similar to the Explorer and can be worn on steel, leather or bund strap. It is listed at 41 mm but wears smaller as the lugs and bezel are not as pronounced as the Submariner. The watch can be had for around 2K on steel and is a great value.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:16 PM   #10
epc2
"TRF" Member
 
epc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: florida
Watch: 116610LV,Pam etc.
Posts: 1,310
keep the sub.
epc2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:49 PM   #11
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
I would stick with the Sub.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:50 PM   #12
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
I would keep the Sub
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:53 PM   #13
HogwldFLTR
2024 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: What's on my wrist
Posts: 33,249
Seems like a reasonable trade, imho. Maybe getting the short end of the stick in terms of pricing however. I'd prefer the Exp to the SubC too. SubC cost about $1K more.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:55 PM   #14
Mystro
2024 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 14,623
Not a good trade IMO.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:56 PM   #15
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 6,971
I would keep the Sub. After selling your Sub at a slight loss, you would be in Explorer 1 territory. Would essentially be a straight trade. Giving up a lot of features in a Sub, considering the cost at this point for you would be equal.
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 10:58 PM   #16
MCO1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
Keep the Sub and get the Explorer when you can. They are both great to own as they are similar but yet very different.
MCO1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2017, 11:59 PM   #17
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,200
Up to you if the itch needs to be scratched but I would personal stick with the Submariner.

True the Sub is more popular but there are good reasons for that being so.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 12:04 AM   #18
xIZeitgeistIx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Switzerland
Watch: DaytonaC & Sub
Posts: 116
I own both models, would never let the Sub go!
xIZeitgeistIx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 12:15 AM   #19
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,371
I would not trade...both are classics and belong in a collection...
besides...its really a bad value play...
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 12:40 AM   #20
kwingy
"TRF" Member
 
kwingy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,264
Keep the sub man - and save up for the explorer.
kwingy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 12:51 AM   #21
dr35mm
"TRF" Member
 
dr35mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Peter
Location: Caribbean
Watch: BB58
Posts: 2,398
Oh no, please don't sell the quintessential Rolex/Sports watch.

Maybe save up for an explorer (which btw is a "common" watch as well...)
__________________


Present: BB58 | BB36 | GMW-B5000D-1JF | 6900-PT80

Past: 16610LN | 16622 | 116610LN | 214270
dr35mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 01:19 AM   #22
mschafer
"TRF" Member
 
mschafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 971
I definitely see your point and love an Exp I for its subtlety and easy readability. The only thing that has to make sense is the money part. Sub is such a classic that I would hold on to and save up for the new one. If you find that after a year or so that the Sub gets zero wrist time you can still sell it. You won’t loose any value, it might even increase...
mschafer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 01:40 AM   #23
Drives550
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 43
Hello - One of my first posts as well. Tough question to ask, as it's fairly weighted toward personal preference, with a sprinkle of economics. Which to be true, is also personal.

My first was/is a Sub, but similar thinking as yours opened up my thinking to "what watch do *I* really want, notwithstanding what other people might like". And for me, it's the Oysterquartz at present. Explorer would be my second choice.

I still have the Sub. Wear it occasionally. Evaluating if I'm a "collector" sort or not. We'll see.

So, my opinion would be to do whatever makes it so when you look down at your wrist you smile and think to yourself, "yeah... I like that", and doesn't cost you money you can't afford.
Drives550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 02:00 AM   #24
karmatp
"TRF" Member
 
karmatp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by jesseB13 View Post
I appreciate the comments, was definitely looking for you guys to say pull the trigger...but apparently you all are smart and not impulsive...so, I will keep the Sub and save for the Explorer. (kind of knew answer but was hoping for bad advice from you all lol). Thanks for the input!! I guess next is the Explorer unless any of you all have additional suggestions in that price range? I like IWC, but not sure if it's worth it for watch like Inteneur or Mark etc...especially since they aren't in house...may as well go w/ Sinn for less? any thoughts on mixing it up...? looking for a little less of a diver and more versatile...Explorer is no brainer, but....Thoughts? Thanks in advance!
I like to have a variety. I think a Speedy Pro and the sub would be a great combo for you. Buy the speedy on the bracelet and throw it on a strap. You will be able to buy a few straps and have a nice variety.
__________________
My grails:
karmatp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2017, 01:54 PM   #25
psychokandy
"TRF" Member
 
psychokandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PG.PJ.SH
Watch: Crown.Rose.Shield
Posts: 173
just like the rest of the members said, keep the Sub and save up for Explorer. I would go that route too if i were you :)
psychokandy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.