ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 October 2017, 10:18 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
Rolex QC on my new EX2 -- Within Spec?
Hi everyone,
I received my BNIB Ex2 in the mail today. My first Rolex. I was very excited, and I also have a problem with looking very closely at my watches. I see perceived imperfections very easily. So, I need your help! Is the attached photo within specs, normal for Rolex? Basically the 12 marker looks like it's a smidge to the right... Or the crown markers are a smidge to the left. Or maybe 12 marker is slightly crooked. Anyone else here with similar issues? If this is normal for Rolex, I'm fine. If it's not, should I request an exhange? TIA!! |
22 October 2017, 10:25 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
|
So the crown logo on the inner rehaut is very commonly not perfectly lined up with the tick at 12:00. There are many threads discussing it. That’s pretty normal and I wouldn’t worry about it at all.
Your dial is a different story. The inverted triangle should absolutely line up with the crown below. If it’s off like your pictures show, I would call Dallas RSC and send it to them. They will likely replace the dial under warranty. |
22 October 2017, 10:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
|
Attached is a picture directly from the Rolex website to compare with.
|
22 October 2017, 10:38 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
If you want to enjoy any watch even AP/Patek put that loupe away into the bin.
You will ruin the enjoyment of the watch if you look at magnified pictures of each watch because you will find imperfections with every single one of them. |
22 October 2017, 10:40 AM | #5 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
__________________
126720VTNR / 126200 Palm Frond / 126622 / Grand Seiko SBGA493 / Omega Snoopy |
|
22 October 2017, 10:41 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
I agree. I saw this without a loupe and right away.
|
22 October 2017, 10:51 AM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
|
|
22 October 2017, 11:00 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: USA
Watch: 16622,BLNR,116500
Posts: 974
|
Looks perfectly normal to me.
|
22 October 2017, 12:10 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
|
22 October 2017, 12:16 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Here
Watch: SpeedyPro Explorer
Posts: 235
|
Rolex QC on my new EX2 -- Within Spec?
If it bothers you, you should request for an exchange.
ETA: I checked my Explorer and both the crown and the triangle marker are perfectly aligned. |
22 October 2017, 12:22 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Andrey
Location: Vienna, VA
Watch: 116610
Posts: 147
|
I have a black faced 2016 EX2 without any of the above aesthetic imperfections. However, my EX2 did have a movement issue. It would wind rough. The problem got worse in the first 6 months I owned the watch. I finally sent it back for Service under warranty and it came back fine.
That being said, I did buy my ex girlfriend a Ladies Datejust that would lose 5 minutes a day in March 2016. So that’s 2 new Rolos in 1 year with serious QC issues. I don’t think I am a statistical anomaly. Very few luxury watches are truly perfect. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
22 October 2017, 12:24 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Colorado
Watch: 15400st
Posts: 133
|
Now you got me squinting at my sub's rehaut on the train
|
22 October 2017, 01:30 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Here
Watch: SpeedyPro Explorer
Posts: 235
|
|
22 October 2017, 01:43 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Lee
Location: South East Asia
Watch: Tudor Pro
Posts: 1,770
|
Really? Wow, tough bunch of customers we are! Hahaha... it would be deemed ok to me.
|
22 October 2017, 02:00 PM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: BMF
Location: California USA
Watch: FPJ UTC
Posts: 2,245
|
Totally fine in my opinion. Enjoy the awesome ExpII!
|
22 October 2017, 03:05 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,328
|
People don't realize that the dials are hand made and the markers applied by hand. There is bound to be imperfections. It does not effect the value of the watch. It would not bother me. If it bothers you that much you can take it back to the AD and see what they can do. If the warranty card is already in your name they are likely to say it is a warranty issues. Doesn't matter if you left the stickers on. Some AD's will hold the warranty card back and leave the stickers on just in case someone wants to change their mind about the watch.
|
22 October 2017, 04:20 PM | #17 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
__________________
126720VTNR / 126200 Palm Frond / 126622 / Grand Seiko SBGA493 / Omega Snoopy |
|
22 October 2017, 05:08 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 761
|
Apparently this still falls within specs. I believe Rolex Quality control is done by photo, computer and eye.
But I agree that the lining up should be perfect. On my Explorer it is perfect and that is how it should be.
__________________
♛ Explorer 214270 ♛ Next: Day-Date 36 mm 1 Watch guy |
22 October 2017, 05:50 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: South Africa
Posts: 802
|
Chances are if you take a loupe to the replacement they give you, there will be something off on it as well.
That would not bother me FWIW. |
22 October 2017, 06:21 PM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: CA
Watch: es
Posts: 4,364
|
As others have said. Put the loop away. Just wear and enjoy that Explorer II. Love this model with the white dial.
|
22 October 2017, 06:44 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,120
|
You will find that as the years pass you will not have these problems.....just seeing the watch on your wrist can become a challenge!! If the dial really bugs you then send it back or visit your nearest RSC and ask them to replace the dial. I had some minor issues with a new GMTII-C about 10 years ago and the RSC here in London just switched the dial for me, no problem.
|
22 October 2017, 06:58 PM | #22 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,638
|
Quote:
Quote:
The rehaut engraving isn’t fine. Your dial will Ben very slightly off. It’s normal in that respect as there is an element of “play” when the dials are fitted. I wouldn’t stress the rehaut but if you’re not happy you could question your seller on the marker being a little off.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
||
22 October 2017, 08:38 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: ing the Detectives
Posts: 1,885
|
If I were the AD, I'd smile pleasantly at you and either tell you it was within spec, or send it off for a few weeks for you. I'd also make a mental note to tell you the next time you came in, that whatever you wanted was out of stock.
I think there's reasonable expectations of getting a "right" watch, but seeing as how the Coronet is less than 4 mm across, you are complaining that something, on a hand finished dial, that is literally a hairs width off.... |
22 October 2017, 08:47 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Here
Posts: 933
|
It’s fine, in my experience this isn’t uncommon and well within spec. Finding one that lines up absolutely perfect is pretty rare. Rehaut engraving on my Sub is slightly off too, and I picked between two models the AD had and got the better of the two.
|
22 October 2017, 08:49 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,900
|
Wouldn't bother me one bit. Couldn't be bothered with sending it away to be honest.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
22 October 2017, 08:54 PM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 19,446
|
Looks within spec. Of course a quick visit to an RSC can easily correct this. The watch itself is not defective and if you just swap it, the next watch is adding another variable.
So, how is the timekeeping of the watch? How does she feel when you wear her? In the end what really matters is that you enjoy your time :)
__________________
__________________ “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming 'Wow! What a Ride!'” -- Hunter S. Thompson Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
22 October 2017, 08:56 PM | #27 | |
2024 ROLEX DATE-JUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,379
|
Quote:
It obviously can’t hurt to ask the AD for an exchange, but as others have said, many will not once your name is on the card. Don’t expect the coronet on the rehaut to line up. As padi explains it, there is a small amount of play in the dial feet so when the dial is set it may be a hair of a degree off. Even if it’s lined up now, it may change with the first service. If you look at the Subs and GMTs on DavidSW’s site you can see that many/most are slightly off. The dial would probably bother me enough to have it replaced. It may be within spec, but you’re clearly the type of person who looks for these type of details. If your AD doesn’t replace the watch then the RSC should fix it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
22 October 2017, 09:18 PM | #28 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
It bothers me because it's literally the one indice I will look at the most, and the most critical for symmetry. If this were an issue at 1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11, I can promise we wouldn't be having this conversation. The rehaut alone would not bother me, I'd never see it. FWIW, the same thing bothers the heck out of me with driving bezel PIPs. Same with Chrono hands that don't reset to 12 on the dot. Misalignments that I will never unsee. |
|
22 October 2017, 09:21 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 126720VTNR
Posts: 80
|
|
22 October 2017, 09:49 PM | #30 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 44,749
|
I see your point on the watch but I am not sure that depending on the direction the pictures are taken might also impact this. The Explorer II Polar is a great watch. You bought it for a specific reason. Put the loop up, peel the stickers and start wearing it and enjoy it. I would hate to think that someone would look at me with a loop because the imperfections are significant and I am out of warranty, yet every day I go out and make the best of it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.