The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 September 2016, 10:23 PM   #31
1st amg
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
1st amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 9,479
I think the fit and size works really well on you. It does not look abnormal or out of place. The watch is stunning on you, but if you are iffy about the spring bars etc, I think you should stick to your original plan and go for the 372. Its the one panerai that I had that received the most compliments. I sold it a while back but am thinking of adding the new one. FWIW, my wrist size is the same as yous and the 372 looked perfect.
1st amg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 12:03 AM   #32
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1st amg View Post
I think the fit and size works really well on you. It does not look abnormal or out of place. The watch is stunning on you, but if you are iffy about the spring bars etc, I think you should stick to your original plan and go for the 372. Its the one panerai that I had that received the most compliments. I sold it a while back but am thinking of adding the new one. FWIW, my wrist size is the same as yous and the 372 looked perfect.
Thanks, Nick

I love the 372 but was a little put off when Mrs Van D said that from 10 yards away, it's going to look the same as my 359. When I the two side by side yesterday, it looked like she had a point. She also said "Ooh look, another luminor case, woo-hoo! If you want another PAM, go for something a bit different." Not so easy to argue with that one either.

The 690 is a real stunner, just as my 689 is. I love that blue dial and it has to be seen to behold. With the 690, I get a Radiomir case with that amazing blue dial. I lose the ability to switch up the straps so easily but I can live with that because I can still have fun with my 359 and 689.

The spring bar thing is a minor concern but Mrs Van D asked how many people I know of that have lost their Radiomir because a spring bar has popped. Er......

I'm still on the fence but I don't think it's going to take much to tip me over to the 690. I'm not one to make knee-jerk purchases so I'm going to go for another look next weekend and then go from there.

As for the new 372, they apparently won't hit the boutiques until about March next year. If my guy is properly informed, they certainly won't be out on an S serial (2016)
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 10:07 PM   #33
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
I love the 372 but was a little put off when Mrs Van D said that from 10 yards away, it's going to look the same as my 359. When I the two side by side yesterday, it looked like she had a point. She also said "Ooh look, another luminor case, woo-hoo! If you want another PAM, go for something a bit different." Not so easy to argue with that one either.


first of all, you're a lucky man to have a Mrs like that.

second, another 1940 Rad to consider is the 662...it is definitely different from the 359, has the 1940 Rad shape you like and the dial isn't blue, so even less overlap. just an idea...

or, don't over-think it, go with your gut and unveil the 690 as #3.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2016, 10:18 PM   #34
oldsalt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Peter
Location: Australia.
Watch: ?????
Posts: 1,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
Thanks, Nick

I love the 372 but was a little put off when Mrs Van D said that from 10 yards away, it's going to look the same as my 359. When I the two side by side yesterday, it looked like she had a point. She also said "Ooh look, another luminor case, woo-hoo! If you want another PAM, go for something a bit different." Not so easy to argue with that one either.

The 690 is a real stunner, just as my 689 is. I love that blue dial and it has to be seen to behold. With the 690, I get a Radiomir case with that amazing blue dial. I lose the ability to switch up the straps so easily but I can live with that because I can still have fun with my 359 and 689.

The spring bar thing is a minor concern but Mrs Van D asked how many people I know of that have lost their Radiomir because a spring bar has popped. Er......

I'm still on the fence but I don't think it's going to take much to tip me over to the 690. I'm not one to make knee-jerk purchases so I'm going to go for another look next weekend and then go from there.

As for the new 372, they apparently won't hit the boutiques until about March next year. If my guy is properly informed, they certainly won't be out on an S serial (2016)
The boys down at ION Orchard must roll out the red carpet when they see you approaching Paul...

cheers and happy shopping....
oldsalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2016, 12:45 AM   #35
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
first of all, you're a lucky man to have a Mrs like that.

second, another 1940 Rad to consider is the 662...it is definitely different from the 359, has the 1940 Rad shape you like and the dial isn't blue, so even less overlap. just an idea...

or, don't over-think it, go with your gut and unveil the 690 as #3.
I'm very lucky indeed. She's just agreed with you and told me so!

I just had a look at the 662; nah, brown isn't my colour. Mrs Van D just turned her nose up at it too, so looks like the 690 is still the one

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldsalt View Post
The boys down at ION Orchard must roll out the red carpet when they see you approaching Paul...

cheers and happy shopping....
There's a reason they have those huge glass windows Peter, and that's to see me coming!

__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2016, 12:50 AM   #36
lig
"TRF" Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,605
A. The watch looks amazing on you (factoring in the arm hair )

B. You married well.

Top work!
lig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2016, 01:35 AM   #37
Cru Jones
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 34,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
I'm very lucky indeed. She's just agreed with you and told me so!

I just had a look at the 662; nah, brown isn't my colour. Mrs Van D just turned her nose up at it too, so looks like the 690 is still the one



There's a reason they have those huge glass windows Peter, and that's to see me coming!


Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2016, 11:04 AM   #38
oldsalt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Peter
Location: Australia.
Watch: ?????
Posts: 1,015
Those huge glass windows do need a lot of cleaning though... every time I'm there I stand with my nose pressed against the glass just drooling.... (it's safer for my wallet if I stay on the outside)...
oldsalt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2016, 01:52 AM   #39
Starwalker
"TRF" Member
 
Starwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,237
looks great!
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds
Starwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2016, 11:20 AM   #40
WJGESQ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublovin View Post
Yep, works great! Man, those blue dials are stunning
I couldn't tell if it was black or blue
WJGESQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2016, 12:44 PM   #41
Mastergreenhand
"TRF" Member
 
Mastergreenhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks
Posts: 1,170
Looks good. Not too big.
__________________
Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212
Mastergreenhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2016, 10:50 PM   #42
htbilgic
"TRF" Member
 
htbilgic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chicago
Watch: Doxa Pro 300 NoT
Posts: 535
It looks good on you.
htbilgic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2016, 11:09 PM   #43
Andad
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 36,807
Look like a good size for you...and a nice bangle too.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2016, 11:10 PM   #44
r8t3d_M
"TRF" Member
 
r8t3d_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Felipe
Location: NYC
Watch: Me ;)
Posts: 2,894
I think it looks good. The blue dial looks lovely.
r8t3d_M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2016, 01:55 PM   #45
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Look like a good size for you...and a nice bangle too.
It's a carved, wooden bracelet and the carvings are of Buddha. I bought it in Cambodia for $1 and wear it as a reminder-to-self to chill

As for the watch, I'm still on the fence and I have a nagging feeling in my mind that I should wait for the sapphire 372. That is the piece I was originally jonesing for. Aside from that I prefer the Luminor cases and I already have a blue dial, sooooooooooooooo..................


In short, I'm not sure. I can't go look again this weekend because I'm off to Taiwan on a job in the morning
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2016, 11:58 AM   #46
stratguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Speedmaster Pro
Posts: 670
That watch looks fantastic on you! Go for it.
stratguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2016, 10:43 PM   #47
Ar_Mi
"TRF" Member
 
Ar_Mi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dubai/Los Angeles
Watch: a few
Posts: 593
yea looks great !
Ar_Mi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2016, 10:48 PM   #48
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,607
wheres the watch? JK. Looks great on you and beautiful dial color. Go for it!
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 04:27 AM   #49
Minimalist
"TRF" Member
 
Minimalist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,215
Been away for ages again but looks like you've been quite busy! You're staking up some nice Pam's there Ruud.

I recently looked at some pics of the 690 and I fell in love, it is an absolute beauty and blue for me on a watch is just stunning.

But I have been looking at the 422 as my next option to go with the 312.

Looking forward to see what you get :)
Minimalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 October 2016, 05:38 AM   #50
PatrickJ
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: England
Posts: 456
It looks good. As long as it is comfortable on the wrist your good to go.
PatrickJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2016, 04:01 AM   #51
4Panerais
"TRF" Member
 
4Panerais's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: William
Location: Az
Watch: Panerai
Posts: 528
Works for me. Lookin' good
4Panerais is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2016, 04:39 AM   #52
cda555
"TRF" Member
 
cda555's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Watch: GMT IIc and PO
Posts: 1,638
Looks fantastic on you.
cda555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2016, 04:45 AM   #53
glg
"TRF" Member
 
glg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Athens
Posts: 63
It works just fine


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
glg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2016, 01:58 PM   #54
Vaxe
"TRF" Member
 
Vaxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
Looks good to me
Vaxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.