ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 December 2017, 12:27 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 71
|
Model 1603 from 1973 water damaged?
Hello to you all.
I have been offered a 1603/1570 DJ from 1973, guy bought it in Germany in September with a 1 year warranty, Dial looks original , but between 6 and 8 on the second markers there looks to be water damage? case looks be polished also. I know this guy, good rolex knowledge , he wants to change up to (wait for it) A seadweller triple 6 from 1986.. his birth year. Good luck on that.. he wants $2400 for this.. This morning , my heart almost pulled the trigger, but my head screamed wait and won the day. pics attached.. Many thanks in advance for advice Is this a dog, or just the history when some fool forget to screw down the crown. Stephen Hells bells... now I need 9 more posts before I can attach pics... May as well start here Sorry people Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk |
26 December 2017, 02:14 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
without a picture, there is very little we can help you with. Sorry. If you provide a link, then maybe some people, not me - as I refuse to follow unknown links, might look at it. other wise, post comments and opinions, get up to 10, and them post photos
|
26 December 2017, 02:27 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Willy
Location: AU, SG, MY
Posts: 1,248
|
Oysters remain decently waterfast even if crown is open & it gets splashed. But if you drop it to the bottom of a lake or rinse it with a firehose, then yeah it might get past the tiny o-ring & flood inside.
Dials can deteriorate by themselves just over time, it's been 45yrs :) 1570 is hardy, spareparts are available but naturally nothing is cheap. You'll have to do your own sums on the economics of restoring vs buying a different better unit. |
26 December 2017, 07:06 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
Sounmds too expensive to me ...
If I'm understanding the OP's post correctly, I'm thinking $2400 is too expensive for a DateJust 1603 with a damaged dial.
As a basis for comparison, I have this watch. A tidy enough 1603 from 1968, - same price $2400 Last edited by Lol-x; 26 December 2017 at 07:19 PM.. Reason: Rule breach |
26 December 2017, 11:06 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 71
|
Hi all, the more I think about my 24 hour rule, the more I agree with Paul. Glad I used my head rather than my heart on this. I hope to have 10 posts soon. Then I hope not to bother everybody so much with "pictureless" posts
S Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.