The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 February 2018, 10:42 AM   #1
Zeckman
"TRF" Member
 
Zeckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Coruna
Posts: 89
Triple 6 or Kermit?

I used to have a 16610LV but I let it go. It is the only watch I sold that I find myself thinking about sometimes.

Now I am thinking about adding a new piece and here I am hesitating between the SD 16660 matte dial and the kermit 16610LV that I already had.

Both have pros and cons.

I could use some neutral advice... wich one would you choose and why?

The SD in the picture is from @andygreenlive

Thanks in advance.
Zeckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 10:44 AM   #2
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,908
Brilliant duo. :)

The SD is a looker, but the LV is a keeper.

The LV can flex inserts - and the SD will sure indeed be a concern in just a few years when it comes to service....
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 10:47 AM   #3
Raza_actual
"TRF" Member
 
Raza_actual's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Philadelphia
Watch: Monaco
Posts: 391
Why the SD and not a black Submariner, out of curiosity?
__________________
TAG Heuer Monaco LE|Omega Speedmaster|Tudor Ranger|Rolex Submariner
Raza_actual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 10:48 AM   #4
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,741
Tough choice, both have qualities I love.. But, if I had to pick one, 16660 matte dial.
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 10:50 AM   #5
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by raza_actual View Post
why the sd and not a black submariner, out of curiosity?
maxi plots
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 10:53 AM   #6
MP5
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,881
Matte 666!All day every day
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 10:54 AM   #7
Loevhagen
"TRF" Member
 
Loevhagen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by MP5 View Post
Matte 666!All day every day
Also at RSC...?
Loevhagen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 11:18 AM   #8
Al1969
2024 Pledge Member
 
Al1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,607
Sub LV.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 1DBD0857-EF9C-4FD8-8573-451472BAF272.jpeg (99.8 KB, 865 views)
__________________
WG SUB-116719
GMT MASTER II 126719
Al1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 11:18 AM   #9
Zeckman
"TRF" Member
 
Zeckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Coruna
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raza_actual View Post
Why the SD and not a black Submariner, out of curiosity?
You mean why not a 1680? Because I like the flat sapphire look better than the domed plexi (and I never had a rolex without a cyclops)
Zeckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 11:22 AM   #10
Duey
2024 Pledge Member
 
Duey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Duey
Location: Maui
Watch: Too Many To List
Posts: 3,575
Lv
Duey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 11:22 AM   #11
MP5
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loevhagen View Post
Also at RSC...?
I dont get it? RSC would never touch any of my watches. There are a ton of vintage Rolex specialists with gold reputations around the country and even more so in Europe I would imagine
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 02:00 PM   #12
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,606
triple 6
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 2230.50.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002
Zenith 02.470.405
Henry Archer Eclipse

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 02:58 PM   #13
SMC84
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: New England
Watch: Rolex & IWC
Posts: 200
Triple 6!
SMC84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 04:07 PM   #14
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,356
Sorry but I have to weight in here...I own both and it's the triple 6 matte dial.....it's not close for me. If you can source a nice example of the triple 6 matte, run do not walk.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 04:13 PM   #15
cpefy3
"TRF" Member
 
cpefy3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Collin
Location: Raleigh, NC
Watch: 16014, 16600
Posts: 344
Depends on condition, but I’d lean towards the Kermit. I truly feel that it will appreciate in value as long as you are able to keep the bezel in decent shape. That is an awesome problem to have btw!! ��
cpefy3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 04:26 PM   #16
Bolivia
"TRF" Member
 
Bolivia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Pablo
Location: Bolivia
Posts: 24
LV all the way.
Bolivia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 04:41 PM   #17
paltak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 822
Hard to go wrong with either one but the LV wears better than the SD.
paltak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 04:46 PM   #18
Joearch
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,489
LV for me
Joearch is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 05:07 PM   #19
Len
"TRF" Member
 
Len's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Hans Henrik
Location: EU, Denmark
Posts: 184
I have had my V series 16610LV since 2009 and its a keeper. I also have had an matte 16660 from 1983. Both great watches, but I prefere the LV. I like the Green/black look and prefere the comfort from the sub over the SD.
Len is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 05:30 PM   #20
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,113
tough one.

but i'd say 666 because there's simply far fewer good ones around and its one of the few special reference sport 5d's to those in the know in this watch collecting sub culture.

its instant wis street cred which is unique today with all the marketed special editions and numbered production runs. rolex fans made the 666 special all on their own. and how cool is a 666 reference!

where the LV is a fine watch, but it seems to have been forced as being special because rolex says its special.


call me old fashion.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 05:33 PM   #21
CPRWATCH
"TRF" Member
 
CPRWATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,592
For me I would say go for the LV . It's got the best of old & new features ,plus it's got the green insert .
CPRWATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 05:40 PM   #22
Swiss Mad!
"TRF" Member
 
Swiss Mad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Max
Location: UK
Watch: Various
Posts: 3,726
Great combo...tough choice.

LV for me - although that open 6 & 9 date wheel on the SD is very very naughty...!

1st world problems lol - Good luck!

__________________

instagram: max.parkin
Swiss Mad! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 06:08 PM   #23
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
666
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 06:20 PM   #24
jay_kay
"TRF" Member
 
jay_kay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
I'm in the LV camp.



Can't beat a bit of colour on a Rolex!!
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
jay_kay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 06:24 PM   #25
joli160
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,359
666 > LV
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 06:26 PM   #26
CPRWATCH
"TRF" Member
 
CPRWATCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Paul
Location: Chester UK
Watch: Rolex GMT Master
Posts: 4,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPRWATCH View Post
For me I would say go for the LV . It's got the best of old & new features ,plus it's got the green insert .
Now with added picture
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg image.jpeg (232.8 KB, 621 views)
CPRWATCH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 06:27 PM   #27
asiparks
"TRF" Member
 
asiparks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: ing the Detectives
Posts: 1,885
if you can get a triple six that looks something like the one in the pic, then 666 all the way. That really is something special. The LV is just a sub with a green insert.
asiparks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 06:59 PM   #28
dave023
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: David
Location: Home
Watch: Classics
Posts: 773
I like sea dwellers
dave023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 07:11 PM   #29
Shaky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
The Kermit all day every day I’m afraid.
I think it really is a stunning watch and stands out from the crowd.
Prices on both will no doubt keep rising but it the 50th anniversary watch of the venerable Submariner.

Does it get better ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2018, 08:00 PM   #30
Zeckman
"TRF" Member
 
Zeckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Coruna
Posts: 89
LV is winning so far... I was hoping you would talk me out of goong back to Green Town...
Zeckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.