ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 January 2021, 05:17 PM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,345
|
Quote:
__________________
Exp2 | Exp1 | BLNR | SD43 | DSSD | 16710 | Ak | 116505 | 116610 | 16610 | 16700 | Yacht-Master | 116710 LN | 126710 BLRO mk1 & mk2 | 116500LN | 126610LN | |
|
26 January 2021, 10:50 PM | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2020
Real Name: Don
Location: Vegas Nite Club
Watch: Your mouth
Posts: 2,315
|
I have had some sleepless nights, worrying over my wife's box too.....
|
26 January 2021, 10:55 PM | #63 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,084
|
Quote:
Fussing over it a few times. Yeah, I hear that.
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
|
28 January 2021, 11:39 AM | #64 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
You can call RSC and they can verify the date of sale and the AD where the purchase was done by using the serial number. Not sure if they’ll do it if you ask directly, but I had them verify this unintentionally when I sent my last watch in for service.
I didn’t have easy access to the box and warranty card for a watch I bought from a trusted seller. The watch was still under warranty and I asked if they would be able to verify warranty status by just the serial number. They were able to confirm the date of purchase, the AD, and that my watch was still under warranty. Saved me some time searching for the card, but it also verified the watch was likely legit (which I never doubted). Good luck! |
28 January 2021, 11:48 AM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: USA
Watch: CHNR/YM/DJ/OP/SUB
Posts: 1,844
|
If the box difference is a major concern, know that Rolex ships the boxes and watches to the AD separately. When you purchase a watch, they grab a box and often don't match it up with the watch. Hope it all works out for you. I suspect it will.
|
28 January 2021, 11:54 AM | #66 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,623
|
Quote:
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
|
28 January 2021, 12:42 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
Don't put too much weight into the boxes. They're cheap and almost certainly not made by Rolex.
|
28 January 2021, 02:23 PM | #68 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Uranus
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 4,622
|
Poor seller if he was honest and just trying to move one of his pieces. Now you just flagged him as a flipper to his AD bc of your lack of due diligence and insecurity before purchasing.
Tbh the seller should be the one losing sleep over a possibly ruined AD relationship. |
28 January 2021, 10:15 PM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,036
|
A long time ago before I was buying my watch I called torneau and they confirmed the watch was sold to gentleman I identified on date on receipt. That’s all you need. You don’t need them to swipe any cards. Call them or try someone else. Maybe you got a douche
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
28 January 2021, 11:09 PM | #70 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Maui
Posts: 327
|
The best (maybe only) way to ensure 100% authenticity of a used Rolex is to send it to an RSC for inspection and repair. You will receive back your "like new" watch, and the service invoice certifies the provenance of the watch along with a 2-yr warranty. I did this before selling one of my older watches a while back. Money well spent.
|
29 January 2021, 01:22 AM | #71 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Neal
Location: Point Loma
Watch: ing the river flow
Posts: 2,821
|
Assuming AD has the ability, it seems to me to be a reasonable request to ask the AD to verify ONLY that the watch was in fact sold from AD on a certain date as indicated on the card. As long as the OP is not requesting confirmation of authenticity or confirmation about buyer's personal identity, that seems quite reasonable, even if AD is not 'required' to provide.
__________________
. Sub No Date (14060); Hamilton field; Explorer (124270); Day Date (18238) stolen by wife; CasiOak. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.