ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Juggernaut · 14 July 2011, 04:29 AM

COSC is for "Certified Officially Superlative Chronometer"???

sleddog · 14 July 2011, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juggernaut

COSC is for "Certified Officially Superlative Chronometer"???

Correct!

mikkolopez · 14 July 2011, 09:15 PM

loving my 14060M, clean and visually balanced dial ... and no pesky date window (it's just me)

LibertysMom · 29 January 2012, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikkolopez

loving my 14060M, clean and visually balanced dial ... and no pesky date window (it's just me)

Your watch looks magnificent!

I just picked up a new 14060M from my AD today, and am really enjoying it. Initially I had concerns that it would look too big (I'm female), but am really pleased with its appearance and weight after about eight hours of wrist time. My hubby tried on a new DSSD, and it looked stunning on him. Now, I know what I am going to get him for Valentine's. :-)

Bigsymo · 18 February 2012, 07:07 AM

i've just done a trade deal and got my very first rolex!
its a d series 16610.
if i'm totally honest i prefer the look of the 14060 but i cant do without a date.

Lion · 18 February 2012, 11:36 AM

I have a 14060m and really enjoy the fact that it doesn't have a date and is non-COSC.....also to me it's a link to the past history of Rolex Submariners!!!

GradyPhilpott · 18 February 2012, 02:47 PM

I love threads about the Submariner.

xjeeunitx · 18 February 2012, 04:55 PM

It's all in your head mannnnnn..... Nice watches!

Juggernaut · 25 August 2013, 03:57 PM

Does the 14060 have the same bezel as the 551X/1680/1665?
And I wonder if a 5513 dial would fit a 14060 movement???

Jack T · 25 August 2013, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juggernaut

COSC is for "Certified Officially Superlative Chronometer"???

COSC aka C.O.S.C. is Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres, the Official Swiss Chronometer Testing Institute, which is the institute responsible for certifying the accuracy and precision of wristwatches in Switzerland.

gpfps · 25 August 2013, 10:23 PM

The sub has a thinner case but not by much. The bezel is thinner also. Comparing it to sub date.

Juggernaut · 31 March 2017, 05:21 PM

Sorry re-awaken an old thread, but this topic has become very pertinent to me as I'm on the hunt for a pre-ceramic Sub. I want a Luminova dial and a no-holes case which mean either a 14060M or a 2000-2002. For me thinner is better, but the no-date is only slimmer by like 1/2mm. I would prefer the SEL bracelet which also has the improved diver's extension. Date vs no date is a toss-up due to the usual arguments....
But based on the other stuff, I guess I just chose to go with a 16610!

hammywatch · 10 December 2017, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juggernaut

Sorry re-awaken an old thread, but this topic has become very pertinent to me as I'm on the hunt for a pre-ceramic Sub. I want a Luminova dial and a no-holes case which mean either a 14060M or a 2000-2002. For me thinner is better, but the no-date is only slimmer by like 1/2mm. I would prefer the SEL bracelet which also has the improved diver's extension. Date vs no date is a toss-up due to the usual arguments....
But based on the other stuff, I guess I just chose to go with a 16610!

Hello Juggernaut! Happy that you're hunting a 5 digit sub :) As of my knowledge, 14060m is the only model that has pin-hole produced all the way till it got replaced with 114060. Hence, i don't think you will be able to find any pieces without the pin-hole.

Fellow experts, please correct me if i'm wrong.

Happy hunting!

Cheers!

cop414 · 10 December 2017, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hammywatch

Hello Juggernaut! Happy that you're hunting a 5 digit sub :) As of my knowledge, 14060m is the only model that has pin-hole produced all the way till it got replaced with 114060. Hence, i don't think you will be able to find any pieces without the pin-hole.

Fellow experts, please correct me if i'm wrong.

Happy hunting!

Cheers!

Correct you are.

mtgjr · 10 December 2017, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hammywatch

Hello Juggernaut! Happy that you're hunting a 5 digit sub :) As of my knowledge, 14060m is the only model that has pin-hole produced all the way till it got replaced with 114060. Hence, i don't think you will be able to find any pieces without the pin-hole.

Fellow experts, please correct me if i'm wrong.

Happy hunting!

Cheers!

You're correct. Just wondering if he's still hunting nine months after his post. I suppose it's possible.

hammywatch · 11 December 2017, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtgjr

You're correct. Just wondering if he's still hunting nine months after his post. I suppose it's possible.

Haha maybe yes as he might be sourcing for one without pin hole

Hope he can realise that it doesn’t exist and go for those with pin holes now :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

18 February 2012, 11:36 AM	#36
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	I have a 14060m and really enjoy the fact that it doesn't have a date and is non-COSC.....also to me it's a link to the past history of Rolex Submariners!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

18 February 2012, 02:47 PM	#37
GradyPhilpott 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: 116710 BLNR Posts: 34,345	I love threads about the Submariner. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

14 July 2011, 04:29 AM	#31
Juggernaut "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 901	COSC is for "Certified Officially Superlative Chronometer"???

14 July 2011, 09:15 PM	#33
mikkolopez "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Philippines Posts: 2,301	loving my 14060M, clean and visually balanced dial ... and no pesky date window (it's just me)

18 February 2012, 07:07 AM	#35
Bigsymo "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: UK Posts: 21	i've just done a trade deal and got my very first rolex! its a d series 16610. if i'm totally honest i prefer the look of the 14060 but i cant do without a date.

18 February 2012, 04:55 PM	#38
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,430	It's all in your head mannnnnn..... Nice watches!

25 August 2013, 03:57 PM	#39
Juggernaut "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 901	Does the 14060 have the same bezel as the 551X/1680/1665? And I wonder if a 5513 dial would fit a 14060 movement???

25 August 2013, 10:23 PM	#41
gpfps Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: George Location: Detroit Michigan Watch: 18078 Posts: 1,142	The sub has a thinner case but not by much. The bezel is thinner also. Comparing it to sub date.

31 March 2017, 05:21 PM	#42
Juggernaut "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 901	Sorry re-awaken an old thread, but this topic has become very pertinent to me as I'm on the hunt for a pre-ceramic Sub. I want a Luminova dial and a no-holes case which mean either a 14060M or a 2000-2002. For me thinner is better, but the no-date is only slimmer by like 1/2mm. I would prefer the SEL bracelet which also has the improved diver's extension. Date vs no date is a toss-up due to the usual arguments.... But based on the other stuff, I guess I just chose to go with a 16610!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)