The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 May 2022, 11:29 AM   #31
watchnlaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 45
I agree with everything you've said. The 233 is legendary, I have a 112 and I love it. I like a few other older base models but have been quite upset with the direction the brand has taken ever since they went to non screw in casebacks on several "diver" models. It's a real shame, I was a big fan previously. These are luxury items and completely wasteful, to act like these brands want to be sustainable is disingenuous.
watchnlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2022, 11:30 AM   #32
watchnlaw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 45
At some point you'd think the gimmick special editions would have to run their coarse. There are only so many that fans will buy before it's overkill.
watchnlaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2022, 07:01 PM   #33
djman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 22
I know this is primarily a thread about sustainable materials (which I'm not too bothered by, except for the pretty awful logo on the dial), but hear me out.
I used to be a huge Panerai fan, it was my first ever proper watch. I bought a blue face 119 in Selfridges in London for £2500 back in 2005 to celebrate getting a particular job.
Over the years I then bought a 243 (best sub ever made imho), a 233 (one of the best watches Panerai have ever made imvho) and odd things like a 160.
I gave the 119 to my son for his 18th, some years ago now, he has always loved it and it will, I hope, always stay in our family.
However ... I went into the London boutique a few weeks ago and tried on some watches I'd seen online, keen to get back into the brand. Gone from the current collection are most of the watches I liked; the new bracelets are tinny, awful, feel like they've fallen out of a Christmas cracker. I must have tried on 10 watches, none of which I would have worn had they been given to me for free. Massively disappointing. I think the guy in charge has got it seriously wrong. The brand back in 2005 made a handful of models, most with something quite special about them. Now they pump out what feels like hundreds and, as others have said, they just don't have the finishing and quality that I remembered. They feel pretty unsubstantial in the hand and I'm out. It's such a shame. The only silver lining is that pre Vendome pieces seem to be plummeting in value so I might go there. As someone said above, buy from the right era. Maybe a 127. Or wait for 203's to be dragged down by the brand until they're almost worthless and pick one of those up for a song.
djman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2022, 08:03 PM   #34
77T
2024 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,565
Panerai’s impact on the environmental issue would be very, very small. But stating a corporate direction on sustainability (i.e. part of their production choice) is being transparent with their customer base.

I’d guess Panerai would have been pilloried had the post-consumer recycled content been kept a secret.

Whether it has greater appeal depends upon the customer base in 2025 onward. Good promotion already since the watch world has noticed and a discussion is taking place.

As for impact, even if Rolex + Swatch converted every model into 100% recycled content (if that was even possible), it would be on the order of a gnat on an elephant’s trunk.
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2022, 12:51 AM   #35
lowmandfl
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 537
I wholeheartedly agree with this thread. I had a Pam1024 and a PAM1305, and enjoyed both. It’s a brand I want to love, and keep hoping they get back on track, but for all of the reasons mentioned in this thread have found the brand hugely disappointing. All the while their quality of finishing and movements is going down, and prices keep going up. I feel they are already over priced, given the finishing I’ve seen. At what point does it break the brand?
lowmandfl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2022, 04:09 AM   #36
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,108
I've owned seven different Panerai watches across all their different case offerings and the only two that I miss are my PAM024 and PAM005. The brand has just traveled in a direction that I am no longer interested in. It really has nothing to do with recycled materials or even the use of innovative novel materials. It just comes down to the branding, the movements, the compromises on the entry level models, and the ridiculous asking prices.

There is no consistency in the offerings, the catalogue is bloated, and you cannot get what most lovers of the brand really want: stainless steel, sandwich dial references with minimal complications, minimal dial text, domed crystals, and conservative designs. People want the PAM111, PAM112, PAM210, PAM372. That's your core offerings and there's no reason any of those models should have been discontinued (just given better movements as they are introduced).
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2022, 06:51 AM   #37
crazycarlitos
"TRF" Member
 
crazycarlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,906
Not a fan.

Haven’t seen any new model to drool over or crave since the Pam911 by AB in 2018.

AB was a true salesman. Lol
Jean-Marc is just an idealistic talker

JM, Coffee’s for closers
__________________
crazycarlitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2022, 09:13 AM   #38
jarecki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: U.S. and A.
Watch: it.
Posts: 362
I couldn’t care less about the cardboard boxes, I buy the watch. I do think that making a wooden box that I’m going to put in the closet forever is wasteful.

Having said that, I went to a Panerai boutique again the other day, first time in 3 years or so, and didn’t find many references that spoke to me… All those 44mm and 42mm submersibles are not great. I get it they have to market to a broader audience, but still…

The Radiomir line looks like have been gutted. The Duo - let’s not even talk about it…
jarecki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2022, 02:54 PM   #39
Polar Bear
"TRF" Member
 
Polar Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Australia
Watch: Panerai PAM687
Posts: 762
Without wanting to start a fire here, I do have to ask, everyone that is upset with the current direction the brand is heading in, when was the last time you bought a Panerai at an AD and what discount did they give you?

IME, most of the people most upset about the direction of the brand haven't actually bought a new PAM in more than 5 years (and if they did, they pushed for AT LEAST a 20% discount)
Polar Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2022, 11:40 PM   #40
rmwill
2024 Pledge Member
 
rmwill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 880
I wish Richemont put as much emphasis on Panerai as they do on Cartier.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN
Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600
Rolex Explorer 224270
Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar
Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich
Panerai PAM00111

2 Factor Authentication
rmwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2022, 04:50 AM   #41
crazycarlitos
"TRF" Member
 
crazycarlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,906
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polar Bear View Post

IME, most of the people most upset about the direction of the brand haven't actually bought a new PAM in more than 5 years (and if they did, they pushed for AT LEAST a 20% discount)
Personally, I am not upset. It’s just a watch company.
Just don’t like the general direction panerai is headed… which seems like lowering their cost and quality.. and try to appeal to the mass public.

I still walk in to Panerai whenever I get a chance. But I haven’t seen anything I like in person, or on-line.

Why would I buy anything if I don’t see anything I like? Lol
__________________
crazycarlitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2022, 05:44 AM   #42
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmwill View Post
I wish Richemont put as much emphasis on Panerai as they do on Cartier.
Really like what Cartier is doing .

Santos Skeleton ...superb !
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2022, 05:56 AM   #43
rootbeer7
"TRF" Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 5,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by djman View Post
I know this is primarily a thread about sustainable materials (which I'm not too bothered by, except for the pretty awful logo on the dial), but hear me out.
I used to be a huge Panerai fan, it was my first ever proper watch. I bought a blue face 119 in Selfridges in London for £2500 back in 2005 to celebrate getting a particular job.
Over the years I then bought a 243 (best sub ever made imho), a 233 (one of the best watches Panerai have ever made imvho) and odd things like a 160.
I gave the 119 to my son for his 18th, some years ago now, he has always loved it and it will, I hope, always stay in our family.
However ... I went into the London boutique a few weeks ago and tried on some watches I'd seen online, keen to get back into the brand. Gone from the current collection are most of the watches I liked; the new bracelets are tinny, awful, feel like they've fallen out of a Christmas cracker. I must have tried on 10 watches, none of which I would have worn had they been given to me for free. Massively disappointing. I think the guy in charge has got it seriously wrong. The brand back in 2005 made a handful of models, most with something quite special about them. Now they pump out what feels like hundreds and, as others have said, they just don't have the finishing and quality that I remembered. They feel pretty unsubstantial in the hand and I'm out. It's such a shame. The only silver lining is that pre Vendome pieces seem to be plummeting in value so I might go there. As someone said above, buy from the right era. Maybe a 127. Or wait for 203's to be dragged down by the brand until they're almost worthless and pick one of those up for a song.
Totally agree with you apart from the last part. I have an early 112 which feels like a proper Panerai and these are holding up well as are the early limited ones like 127, 217 & 203 (unfortunately).
__________________
@imrootbeer7
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2022, 06:01 AM   #44
Rock Strongo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: SF Bay
Watch: Yes
Posts: 110
I still can't get over the fact that someone wouldn't buy a watch because it includes recycled materials.

Panerai was on life support, the macho big watch era turned them around with the Richemont aquisition, and now they're adjusting to the current era where most of the growth is in China and nobody wants a 47mm metal hockey puck on their wrist.

Change and progress are part of business and life.
Rock Strongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2022, 08:32 AM   #45
sjap68
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Marco Island
Posts: 81
I was kind of late to the Panerai party, I bought my first about 8 years ago and it was a Pam 305 titanium submersible.
I loved the looks, I loved the feel but could never entirely shake the feeling that it had a little too much wrist presence, it was really great big hunk of metal that whilst I loved was not really too inconspicuous and always felt just a little too big ( I know , I know Panerai’s are meant to be big) there was no lug wrist overhang but it just felt too much.

I then proceeded to buy a Radiomir base black seal logo which I again loved the looks, but yet again I felt it wasn’t quite right on my wrist, there was a whole lot of dial that filled an awful lot of wrist space.

Next was a blue dialed Pam 1058 luminor, that was pretty close to perfection for me, it wore beautifully, I liked the size , I liked the looks , I thought I was done.

Alas no. I made the mistake of looking in the Naples Panerai boutique one day and spotted the Pam 683, this truly was love at first site, I tried it on. This to me was absolute perfection,
I bought it right there and then and wore it out of the store.

My Panerai collection was complete as far as I was concerned.

Until I spotted the Pam973 submersible goldtech 42mm with ceramic bezel this was beyond perfection, I couldnt get it out of my head, I had a great collection of Panerai’s, I had 3 Rolexes, how could I possibly justify another Watch.

Well your mind will play tricks on you to justify anything it would appear.

I bought it.

Any way long story short I have now reduced my collection by off loading the Panerai’s down to just the Goldtech submersible ( I also off loaded 2 Rolex ) and focused on just a 3 Watch collection.


I guess what I’m trying to say is that I don’t think Panerai is being destroyed I have bought a number of the more recent references and really liked them, I believe Panerai as a company are evolving to appeal to a different demographic than they were in the 90’s and 2000’s. There simply is no stopping progress or change.
As humans we are really averse to change and unfamiliarity, we like stability and the familiar, we like to maintain the status quo.

So I am happy to buy the more recent models that appeal to me, but can sympathize with the traditionalists who look back with nostalgia about the good old days and what used to be.
sjap68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2022, 12:13 PM   #46
pereztroika
"TRF" Member
 
pereztroika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vanguard
Posts: 111
The problem with Scamerai is not their "push" for sustainabilty but their repeated attempts to fool and deceive their customers. If steel recycling is not done with renewable energy, let's say with a solar-powered furnace for instance, it's NOT a thing as it has been done for ages. Steel has always been recycled. In addition, steel recycling requires much less energy than the production of new steel and should therefore be more affordable.

"Smelting scrap to make new steel is an art almost as ancient as steelmaking itself."
Swiss Steel Group, annual report 2021


Cheers
Jose
__________________
Author of Perezcope – Iconic timepieces under the loupe

Instagram: @perezcope
pereztroika is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2022, 07:53 AM   #47
roger.bolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 135
Clearly he did not consult anyone on this forum!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olFIbXCiZxk
roger.bolton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2022, 02:27 PM   #48
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock Strongo View Post
nobody wants a 47mm metal hockey puck on their wrist.
I do .I have hockey puck carrying wrists .
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2022, 06:54 AM   #49
Gargamel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: France
Posts: 74
The problem is that Panerai went off track 10y ago.
They since try to find their way. But they won't.

New materials, hundreds of limited/re-limited copies, cut down production costs, green washing... None works.

People like the brand for the raw, simple design and honest product.
Quality should be at the heart of ANY product, luxury or not.

This CEO will fail and will be replaced.
It will go on and on until Richemont sell the brand.
Gargamel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2022, 08:34 AM   #50
Undefeatable
"TRF" Member
 
Undefeatable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Irvine, CA
Watch: 124060
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gargamel View Post
The problem is that Panerai went off track 10y ago.
They since try to find their way. But they won't.

New materials, hundreds of limited/re-limited copies, cut down production costs, green washing... None works.

People like the brand for the raw, simple design and honest product.
Quality should be at the heart of ANY product, luxury or not.

This CEO will fail and will be replaced.
It will go on and on until Richemont sell the brand.
100% this.

As someone who has done marketing for the past 8 years as a career, you hit the nail.

If I could take over Panerai, I would reduce the amount of SKU's down to a core collection of say, 20-30 watches. Stick to their heritage, and focus on evolution not revolution. If they want limited editions that feature unique materials, fine, but reduce limited editions to 1-2 releases a year which will make them actually special.
__________________
2FA
Undefeatable is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2022, 10:14 PM   #51
emtee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK
Posts: 1,230
Agree with most of the comments in this thread. I can look past much of it but I just cannot get get over the obvious cost cutting, particularly with the movements, and then trying to hide it whilst at the same time raising prices to silly numbers for some references. It feels like they have zero respect for their customers, especially the ones who have been fans for a long time. I love my 112 and it’s not going anywhere anytime soon but I am put off big time considering purchasing a modern reference. I truly hope they listen and take the brand in a new direction.

BTW I have absolutely no problem with the Due line etc and trying to appeal to a wider audience but do they really have to dumb down all the things that made them great in the first place at the same time?
emtee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2022, 01:37 AM   #52
Hands90
"TRF" Member
 
Hands90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hoboken
Posts: 299
The eSteel. I can't get over how bad it looks on the dial.
Undone watches have always interested me but I don't like the 'Undone' on the dial. It screams Chinese watch co to me.

Same with eSteel, looks like something that would be on a fake Pam.
Hands90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2022, 02:37 AM   #53
Rock Strongo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: SF Bay
Watch: Yes
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hands90 View Post
The eSteel. I can't get over how bad it looks on the dial.
Undone watches have always interested me but I don't like the 'Undone' on the dial. It screams Chinese watch co to me.

Same with eSteel, looks like something that would be on a fake Pam.
Probably not unintentional. Also why they are trending down in sizes (38mm & 40mm). Those of us with access to the regular internet are not the primary consumers of luxury goods anymore.
Rock Strongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2022, 03:55 PM   #54
rajurama
"TRF" Member
 
rajurama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,016
A fine example of going sustainable without making too much drama. Screenshot_2022-05-17-09-53-37-49_1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9.jpgScreenshot_2022-05-17-09-54-04-02_1c337646f29875672b5a61192b9010f9.jpg

Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
__________________
रोलेक्स
rajurama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2022, 04:16 PM   #55
rajurama
"TRF" Member
 
rajurama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,016
https://usa.watchpro.com/is-sustaina...washing/?amp=1
__________________
रोलेक्स
rajurama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 May 2022, 11:12 AM   #56
njlam
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 498
This is the problem when a brand becomes part of a portfolio of brands.

Panerai will no longer offer “classic” Panerai’s like my 233 or the 372 and others. This is a shame but the parent company has other brands (like Cartier) for classic. They are using Panerai for attracting new buyers, and these new buyers are not old enough to not care about sustainability, social Justice and all that other woke
stuff…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Day-Date 118208 YG/Datejust 116139 WG/GMT2 116710 BLNR SS
Patek Philippe Calatrava 5096 RG - Omega Speedmaster 3861 Sapphire SS
Cartier Tank Louis 1140 YG - Panerai GMT 233 SS - Zenith Chrono 01.0240.410 SS
JLC Reverso Duo Q2714910 SS - Grand Seiko SGBA407 - Baltic Aquascaphe SS
TAG Heuer Formula One - Swatch MoonSwatch Mission to the Moon/Mercury/Jupiter/Neptune
njlam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2022, 10:31 AM   #57
Rock Strongo
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: SF Bay
Watch: Yes
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by njlam View Post
This is the problem when a brand becomes part of a portfolio of brands.

Panerai will no longer offer “classic” Panerai’s like my 233 or the 372 and others. This is a shame but the parent company has other brands (like Cartier) for classic. They are using Panerai for attracting new buyers, and these new buyers are not old enough to not care about sustainability, social Justice and all that other woke
stuff…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol what? Ignorance is a benefit of becoming old? That’s a new one.
Rock Strongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2022, 02:07 PM   #58
eonflux
"TRF" Member
 
eonflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajurama View Post
A fine example of going sustainable without making too much drama. Attachment 1292695Attachment 1292696

Sent from my CPH1979 using Tapatalk
I think UN makes some nice watches (and I’ve been fortunate to meet Dr. Ludwig Oechslin) but that piece looks awful, and hopefully it is completely recyclable and will be placed in a blue bin soon
eonflux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 May 2022, 04:41 PM   #59
htc8p
"TRF" Member
 
htc8p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,434
if they want sustainability just make sure the supply chain is fair, sustainable. not these gimmicks.

if their steel is of high quality it will last generations. that's it
htc8p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 May 2022, 02:29 AM   #60
Kevin of Larchmont
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kevin of Larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 2,699
In a hobby where keeping the box and papers is considered integral to maintaining the value of the watch having a cardboard box that will never re-enter the production chain sit on a shelf for years with all the other wooden watch boxes is theater at best and reeks of cost cutting via virtue signaling. The Panerai back catalogue is rich with treasures. The worse the new ones get the more interesting the old become.
Kevin of Larchmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Bobs Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Coronet


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.