ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Saaci · 12 December 2018, 12:48 PM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

MickCollins1916 · 12 December 2018, 12:49 PM

I really like the 16560 polar, but I wouldn’t give up my 214270 to own one. The explorer is one of my favorites.

Allinthegame · 27 December 2018, 04:57 PM

I love the simple elegenace of the Explorer , I dream about it. I was going to buy it before I purchased my 16570 , I don’t regret it though. The 16570 is double the watch IMO. I still want to purchase the Explorer but will have to wait until my funds are correct. Both cool watches , though.

junamuan · 27 December 2018, 05:38 PM

I'll keep the Explorer.
I don't have one yet but it's in my list next.

Foxglove · 27 December 2018, 06:34 PM

No I wouldn't. But what I did do was buy them both!!

Rolex fan 61 · 27 December 2018, 11:21 PM

No

Burlington · 27 December 2018, 11:24 PM

I would yes. But the exp1 is my favourite Rolex by a distance.

Carrera_2 · 27 December 2018, 11:35 PM

Nope. Just added to your collection later on. White dial Explorer is a great watch.

Pauln · 28 December 2018, 12:05 AM

I would keep the Polar and look for a gently used 114270.

Hollie_Rollie · 28 December 2018, 12:28 AM

No way. The Exp 2 40mm was my first ever Rolex. I purchased it a few years ago which I’ve since sold and regret immensely. It was the best bang for buck sports Rolex imo and went with endless natos/strap combos

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JKD75 · 28 December 2018, 12:51 AM

I don't know that I'd switch, but I can hardly wear anything else after getting my MKII last summer, including my BLNR. It's at once more subtle (I don't like the flash of the BLNR for my work) and also very elegant. Without a doubt this would be my one watch for the 'one watch' (ridiculous) hypothetical.

Of course, I do have a 16570 polar on the way.

blue997 · 28 December 2018, 01:22 AM

I prefer the 36mm Explorer I over both :-) I think the 39mm just has too much empty space. Between the Explorer II and the 39mm Explorer I, I prefer the Explorer II

Tony1T · 28 December 2018, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scoobnoob1103

Love the polar dial too much to do that..but definitely add the explorer !

I agree i keeping the EX2, both are fantastic watches.

mirror · 28 December 2018, 05:51 AM

Explorer 2 white dial all the way..

View Poll Results: Explorer ll vs Explorer
Explorer ll 16570	175	46.92%
Explorer 214270	198	53.08%
Voters: 373. You may not vote on this poll

27 December 2018, 06:34 PM	#65
Foxglove "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Ross Location: Houston, TX Watch: yourself Posts: 838	No I wouldn't. But what I did do was buy them both!! __________________ https://www.instagram.com/watchitross/

27 December 2018, 11:24 PM	#67
Burlington "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Europe Posts: 5,634	I would yes. But the exp1 is my favourite Rolex by a distance. __________________ “My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill

28 December 2018, 12:28 AM	#70
Hollie_Rollie 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: U.S.A. Watch: SD43 Posts: 3,096	Explorer ll vs Explorer No way. The Exp 2 40mm was my first ever Rolex. I purchased it a few years ago which I’ve since sold and regret immensely. It was the best bang for buck sports Rolex imo and went with endless natos/strap combos Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 December 2018, 12:48 PM	#61
Saaci "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2018 Location: New York Watch: 16570 Posts: 300	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 December 2018, 12:49 PM	#62
MickCollins1916 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Bill Location: Baltimore, MD Watch: 116600 SD4K Posts: 3,233	I really like the 16560 polar, but I wouldn’t give up my 214270 to own one. The explorer is one of my favorites.

27 December 2018, 04:57 PM	#63
Allinthegame "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: London Watch: Royal Oak/Tank 18k Posts: 262	I love the simple elegenace of the Explorer , I dream about it. I was going to buy it before I purchased my 16570 , I don’t regret it though. The 16570 is double the watch IMO. I still want to purchase the Explorer but will have to wait until my funds are correct. Both cool watches , though.

27 December 2018, 05:38 PM	#64
junamuan "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2016 Real Name: Jun Location: Vancouver, BC Watch: BLNR Posts: 672	I'll keep the Explorer. I don't have one yet but it's in my list next.

27 December 2018, 11:21 PM	#66
Rolex fan 61 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: UK Posts: 1,262	No

27 December 2018, 11:35 PM	#68
Carrera_2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: London, UK Watch: 116710LN Posts: 114	Nope. Just added to your collection later on. White dial Explorer is a great watch.

28 December 2018, 12:05 AM	#69
Pauln "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Paul Location: Colorado Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,543	I would keep the Polar and look for a gently used 114270.

28 December 2018, 12:51 AM	#71
JKD75 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: Minneapolis Posts: 12	I don't know that I'd switch, but I can hardly wear anything else after getting my MKII last summer, including my BLNR. It's at once more subtle (I don't like the flash of the BLNR for my work) and also very elegant. Without a doubt this would be my one watch for the 'one watch' (ridiculous) hypothetical. Of course, I do have a 16570 polar on the way.

28 December 2018, 01:22 AM	#72
blue997 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2018 Location: Ohio Posts: 41	I prefer the 36mm Explorer I over both :-) I think the 39mm just has too much empty space. Between the Explorer II and the 39mm Explorer I, I prefer the Explorer II

28 December 2018, 05:51 AM	#74
mirror Banned Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: United States Posts: 223	Explorer 2 white dial all the way..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)