ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 December 2018, 12:43 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Modern Rolex too big?
Am I alone in wishing Rolex would down size some of its watches?
I love the design and modern build quality of both the explorer l & ll but both feel 3mm too large. I hope we will see a return to a more classic size from Rolex |
12 December 2018, 12:46 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Jim Smyth
Location: Florida
Watch: DD
Posts: 1,842
|
Wish they went bigger. I have a 7-3/4" wrist. 40MM is the smallest I would consider owning. My sweet spot is 42MM-43MM. Glad they make all sizes to keep the masses happy.
|
12 December 2018, 12:47 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Far Far Away
Watch: tick-tock
Posts: 1,206
|
I tend to disagree. I have smaller watches but like the modern once. I believe everything is done for the reason and watch fashion is not exception.
|
12 December 2018, 12:48 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,269
|
As we all know today bigger and heavier is always better I dont think,myself have 8 half inch wrists and quite happy to wear some of my vintage 30mm watches but myself not stereotyped into thinking bigger is better..
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
12 December 2018, 12:49 AM | #5 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,599
|
Quote:
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.” |
|
12 December 2018, 12:50 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
|
Nope, you're not alone.
|
12 December 2018, 12:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 2,021
|
You can always shop around for the 5 digits for things that are more to your liking. Most from the 90's have a modern design and you can wear those effortlessly in today's world.
|
12 December 2018, 12:53 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Maybe Rolex should divide models into two size and class ratings.
Instagram range - Large and extra polished probably with diamonds Classic range - smaller sizes, chamfered edges and matte dials |
12 December 2018, 12:53 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
|
I have a small wrist and I think modern watches are just fine. (6.75")
Enviado desde mi SM-G965F mediante Tapatalk |
12 December 2018, 12:57 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
Sure that’s an option. Regarding the explorer models the newer design is more appealing just not the size
|
12 December 2018, 12:58 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,136
|
Modern rolex is too big. only the Daytona feels right on my wrist frankly
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
12 December 2018, 01:00 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: ny
Posts: 765
|
I like both big and small, depending on the day. but if I had to choose, I prefer the svelte super model look.
|
12 December 2018, 01:00 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
|
I like both my BLNR and Daytona for fit.
More about the watch than the specs for me.
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent |
12 December 2018, 01:06 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 830
|
|
12 December 2018, 01:08 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Northern Rockies
Posts: 260
|
I have petite 6” wrists and most modern “entry level” Rolex sports watches won’t work for me. I’ve owned a 39mm Explorer and a GMT IIc... both too big, which of course means a Sub would be too big as well. On both watches the crown dug into the top of my hand, leaving a painful mark, plus they jut didn’t look quite right either.
A Daytona I tried on in an AD actually fit beautifully but of course is outside my price range. (The one I tried was the WG with blue dial.) I ended up settling on a 34mm OP (wears like 36-37mm) and a 40mm 16570. I prefer the look and build of the current Explorer II but the size and shape of the previous generation is just perfect. My dad’s ‘70s Sub is a great size as well. I don’t expect Rolex to downsize dramatically anytime soon but it would be great if they offered multiple sizes in models like the Explorer. A 36mm Explorer with modern build quality would be very welcome. A 38mm Sub variant is a pipe dream but would allow them to keep the supercase while returning to a more vintage wrist presence. The success of the Black Bay 58 shows that the market is there for a modern luxury diver in a more modest size. |
12 December 2018, 01:08 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: New York
Watch: 16570
Posts: 300
|
Look at the 5 digits again if the 6 digits are too big. The design is not very different and the size is great!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12 December 2018, 01:08 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Midwest
Posts: 374
|
Your not alone. My sweet spot 36-39mm. If the sky dweller was 39mm I’d be all over that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12 December 2018, 01:21 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: USA
Watch: Air King, 116900
Posts: 586
|
I did a quick search, found two sources that show average wrist size for males.
One says 7.25" and the other says 8.5". I'm inclined to believe the 7.25" may be closer to what the actual average wrist size is. That being said, I would make an assumption that based solely on wrist size, the majority of modern rolexes are in a sweet spot. Now that doesn't take into account current trends, personal preferences, etc. I've got a 7" wrist and my 40mm Air King 116900 looks smaller on me but also looks good. My 38mm Seiko Alpinist also looks good on my wrist, and it's on the 'smaller side' on me. I could easily wear a 42-43mm watch without it looking too big, or a 36mm without it looking too small. That's very subjective though, so take it with a grain of salt. https://theslenderwrist.com/average-...ize-for-a-man/ https://wbracelet.com/average-wrist-...st-size-guide/ p.s. @Saaci - I dig those pants, where'd you get them? |
12 December 2018, 01:28 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 173
|
People are bigger now days which means bigger wrists. I believe they're the right size I won't wear a watch smaller than 39 because it will looks silly on me. I'm 6'3 195
|
12 December 2018, 01:29 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: New York
Watch: 16570
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
Uniqlo! I was in looking at some athletic wear... never would have considered buying work clothes there but I loved these pants so much I had to have em! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
12 December 2018, 01:31 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,071
|
I don't wish they down-size. I stick with 4 and 5 digits :)
|
12 December 2018, 01:32 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 297
|
I’m a 5 digit guy!
__________________
14010|14060M|16234|16570|16600 |
12 December 2018, 01:34 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 462
|
Bigger watches are more in the trend at this moment, and in general, I consider Rolex models actually on the smaller side compared to other manufacturers. Rolex has done a great job in not following this "super size" everything movement. Someday, smaller watches will become trendy again and Rolex will still be in balance with those changes.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
__________________
"The Secret of Life is to Enjoy It" |
12 December 2018, 01:45 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 667
|
You’re not alone; that’s why Rolex makes datejust, daydate, in both 36mm and 40/41mm sizes.
Personally, I think the OPs at 39mm look fine, not so much those with maxi case and lugs. It’s about the proportion, not simply the size... |
12 December 2018, 01:49 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 1,115
|
I think their sizing is keeping in line with their conservative pacing and designs. Having owned both older and now newer models I have to say the modern ones certainly feel better on the wrist and more aesthetically pleasing IMO.
|
12 December 2018, 01:50 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
FYI while the 6-digit Submariner looks boxy, be advised that the 6-digit GMT wears just like a 4 and 5-digit Sub. As soon as I tried one on it felt like my old friend 16610 and my concerns subsided. Not all 6-digits are part of the 'oversized' trend.
|
12 December 2018, 01:53 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 297
|
Modern Rolex too big?
Quote:
Interesting. I must try one! I’m a 34mm Air-King wearer daily, and I have a 14060M which is thinner still than the 16610. Thanks for letting me know!
__________________
14010|14060M|16234|16570|16600 |
|
12 December 2018, 01:54 AM | #28 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 21,379
|
X2 I'm with you. I do love my 16700 but it feels like I'm wearing nothing next to my DSSD and YMII.
__________________
Oh, look at the time... Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
12 December 2018, 01:58 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
|
I agree with this. I'm closer to a 7-7/8" to 8" wrist and I wouldn't wear a 5 digit Sub because it looked feminine on me......not that there's anything wroooong with that. The wider lugs on the 6 digit makes the Sub and GMT II wear like a 42 IMO and that's the absolute lowest I could go without feeling self-conscious.
|
12 December 2018, 01:59 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
I love the Blancpain FF but the 45 simply is to big for my '7+ wrist so that model is a no for me even though i love the watch i know i will look like a fool. Wear what you want who cares what others think is what some say. Well, nobody in their right mind would wear a suit thats 2/3 sizes to big. You can if you want but you will look like a clown. I believe 80% of men have a wrist size between 6.5 and 7.5 so the current sweet spot 40mm will work for most just fine. If you have a smaller wrist take advantage on the vintage market. Lots of cool smaller sized watches can be had for a bargain. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.