ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 January 2024, 04:46 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 205
|
Resistance to Magnetic Fields 3135 vs 3235
Hey All
Getting back in the the Rolex game and I am hearing about this small (lol) change to the 3235. I see alot of upside and some teething issues and holdouts as one would expect. My current watch, Oris ProPilot has been magnetized a few times and other than the Milgauss, are the professional watches with the 3235 have anywhere near the same resistance with the new upgrades? Between the new escapement of the 3235 and the updated Parachrom spring, what kind of magnetic resistance can we expect? Is it comparable to Omegas aging Si14 8500 movement? Does it compare to the now discontinued Milgauss? |
8 January 2024, 06:55 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,330
|
Quote:
And even the older Nivorax hairsprings used in most of the Swiss industry including Rolex for the past 50 years were very antimagnetic now according to Rolex the parachrom hairsprings are not magnetic,although there are other things in movement that could get magnetised, IMHO magnetised is often used as a cop out for just simple regulation but to demagnetise any watch is a very very very simple process to do.Even your own body puts out a magnetic field same for every electrical device in your home.Now anyone with any common brain sense grey matter would know never put any mechanical watch directly on any powerful magnet thats common sense as everyone should know.Today the Swiss standard test to be called anti-magnetic watches which most all Swiss watches are today, they have to pass a test including all Rolex.This is to withstand a strong magnetic field of 4800 Amps per meter,and to keeps on running with a maximum deviation of 15- 30 seconds per day.Now this test I am 100% sure that 99% of all watch wearers would never subject or come into contact with such a strong magnetic field so doubt any difference over the 32 series to 31 series..
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
8 January 2024, 07:24 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,700
|
That's a really good question. I haven't seen any published study based on comparative measurements between different movements. Of course many people will have an opinion about this topic. I wouldn't be surprised if Rolex were researching watches that can work reliably in very high magnetic fields.
|
9 January 2024, 01:29 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: A. E. Haas, MD
Location: Sarasota, FL
Watch: DSSD JC
Posts: 129
|
Actually 4,800 a/m is 60 gauss. That is not a lot. The METAS Omega watches withstand 15,000 gauss.
I have had modern Rolex watches slowly get magnetized but as said, easy to fix. Ali |
9 January 2024, 02:47 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,330
|
But in the real world just like the extreme D/R on dive watches they will never be used by man or superman in water.Same for the 15000 gauss watches extremely doubtful if anyone would come into contact with that strong magnetic field.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 January 2024, 03:44 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NJ
Watch: Speedy reduced
Posts: 507
|
Get a cheap EMF reader, you can get them for $10. Test out different materials to see what if anything will block a magnetic field, you will be disappointed.
|
9 January 2024, 03:58 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2023
Real Name: R.M.
Location: Here
Watch: 16264
Posts: 124
|
|
9 January 2024, 04:02 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 205
|
Thank you all for the input
@padi56 I work with small neodymium magnets. Like you mention you would have to be an idiot to touch your watch with a magnet and I agree. However, accidents do happen and I have done it twice only realizing it after. Since, I have cleared my desk of magnetics but the fear is real. |
9 January 2024, 04:29 AM | #9 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,552
|
Quote:
You can buy a watch demagnetizer, on Amazon for $10.00. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
9 January 2024, 04:54 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 205
|
|
9 January 2024, 05:03 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: A. E. Haas, MD
Location: Sarasota, FL
Watch: DSSD JC
Posts: 129
|
Being a scientist, biochemist and person always testing things, I have a gauss meter. Sitting here the earth is giving me a 0.5 G reading. Computers, phones, speakers and a great many other things easily put out 4,800 a/m if you are right up to it. Distance matters as does the time of exposure. Since we are always moving, it would take more time and shorter distances to adversely effect your watch. The conclusion is: do not worry about it. And, if it happens, the fix is easy. Next topic...
Ali |
9 January 2024, 05:32 AM | #12 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,552
|
Quote:
I guess it’s not surprising that the watch movement won’t go back to its pre-magnetized accuracy. I have a Timegrapher, and periodically test the accuracy of my watches. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
9 January 2024, 05:44 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,151
|
Everyone knows, all you need to do is drop your watch in a glass of water, magnets can’t work down there
|
9 January 2024, 05:52 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,330
|
Well Kat in well over 50 years of owning various Rolex watches some used and sometimes abused working a real tool watches.Never felt the need for timegraphers and never had a watch magnetised but must be honest never been anal in checking any of my watches to the exact second.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 January 2024, 06:11 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Mars
Posts: 13
|
What happens off you work near a MRI?
|
9 January 2024, 06:33 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,330
|
You would use common sense and anyone working near any MRI machines would not be allowed to wear anything made from metal that could get magnetised.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 January 2024, 07:16 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,872
|
Quote:
I always wondered how it equates but never pursued it and it explains and contextualises it when I see watches that are resistant up to 4,800 a/m(I have one as my dress watch). Then we see how that compares with the modern Omega Co-axials. From my own experience. I unwittingly magnetised a freshly serviced Rolex with an early 3130 in it and a Nivarox Hair spring. The watch was running in an absolutely superb fashion until I was doing a deep Spring clean around the house and I moved a pair of loudspeakers which had fairly substantial drivers in them. The exposure time wouldn't have been particularly long, but the watch must have been within range of and passed through the magnetic flux of the magnets and certainly long enough to magnetise the movement. It wasn't until I looked at the time later in the day that it was many seconds fast. All credit to Rolex and the dealer I work through, they sent it back to Rolex where they confirmed it was magnetised and simply degaussed it, then returned it free of charge. The round trip was interstate as well and it usually incurs a charge for handling whenever one sends a watch in for a quote for service. It's the first and only time in my life that I have magnetised a watch and it highlights just how quickly and easily it can happen. I do wonder how the early 3130 with the Nivarox Hair spring compares with the 3130 with a Parachrome Hair spring in terms of resistance to magnetism Of course Rolex says it's an improvement, as one would naturally expect. I'm not so sure a late 31xx movement with the Parachrome Hair spring would be any different to any 32xx movement that's fitted with the same type of Hair spring. The important thing to note in this, is the fact that there is likely to be a considerable difference between an early 31xx movement with the Nivarox Hair spring and the later 31xx movement with a Parachrome Hair spring. It's one major reason why I have late 31xx movements based on my previous experience with magnetism. |
|
9 January 2024, 07:24 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,872
|
|
9 January 2024, 07:31 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 359
|
I see alot of upside and some teething issues and holdouts as one would expect.
Good topic. There shouldn’t be any teething issues after almost 7 years since the introduction of the new caliber. Only upsides |
9 January 2024, 07:34 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: São Paulo
Posts: 48
|
|
9 January 2024, 12:11 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,872
|
Quote:
Excellent topic and good contributions with plenty to chew on Regarding the teething issues. There has to be teeth to start with. At least something other than at the say so of the marketing men. Perhaps we are looking at the first "Rolex toothless tiger" |
|
9 January 2024, 12:14 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 7,872
|
It's very simple with a degausser.
They can be purchased online for a relatively small sum of money and anyone can basically do it If I recall correctly. The official Rolex service procedure states that degaussing should be performed at the start of the process. It makes sense really |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.