The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 October 2022, 05:36 AM   #1
fizz
"TRF" Member
 
fizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UAE
Posts: 370
Thoughts on this late 60's 5512

First a disclaimer: a fellow vintage collector friend here in Dubai has been offered this 5512 by a local, reliable dealer. Dubai isn't exactly a haven for watch collecting and most here pursue modern watches so finding one locally has got both myself and my friend excited. While I am not looking at it (I have a lovely 5513 Maxi 3 but I also recently purchased a 116520 from the same seller), I am trying to help him out (he is very interested in this).

To my untrained eye, it looks very good, though the seller isn't too familiar with vintage (he mostly deals with modern as well). His price is "fair" and reflective of what I think is the going rate for these. He did say that he thinks it's a service dial from the 70's and may even have been relumed.

When I saw the watch in person while picking up my Daytona, under UV light it lit up and faded quickly/immediately and the very brief glow was consistent on both dial and hands.

Serial no is 1.8x dating it to 68.

Unfortunately, I can't tell if it's a service dial, later period incorrect dial, or a 100% period correct original dial. The crystal and insert are certainly later service replacements but the fact that it comes with a period correct rivet (dated 67 on the clasp) and also a box (which seems to also be period correct and has a 5512 sticker) makes this very enticing. No papers but those are rarely showstoppers in my book and the box thing is just fancy sprinkles on top.

The scholarship on 5512 is sparse, as compared to 5513 so I seek the wisdom and guidance of the knowledgeable folk here. What do you think is correct and what isn't? Ultimately, the decision to pursue will be my friends but we may all be a little bit more knowledgeable by the end of this.

Pics below (click to see full resolution).

















fizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2022, 09:12 AM   #2
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,433
Probably a later dial IMO, I would expect a meters first matte dial on that. Do you have a straight shot of the dial without the hands covering any text?
swaini3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2022, 09:44 AM   #3
Avs Fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,392
The spring bar on the lower crown side appears to be almost protruding from the lug hole indicating massive polishing if that matters.
Avs Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2022, 10:45 AM   #4
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 5,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by swaini3 View Post
Probably a later dial IMO, I would expect a meters first matte dial on that.
I agree, assuming that the serial/date are correct. The printing details on this dial look sort of similar to what one would see on a Maxi I dial. However, it's always preferable to post photos of everything so the information can be verified. Very often, people post faulty information, which causes confusion. Maybe the serial number is actually 5.8M.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2022, 05:17 PM   #5
lupus66
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: holland
Posts: 285
and one should expect dead lume on a ff dial
lupus66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2022, 07:59 PM   #6
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,595
Definitely needs laser welding…..
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2022, 11:03 PM   #7
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,800
Case is not great, and the lug holes looked pushed in from polishing. They also look too big, although perhaps it's the angle in the photo.

Do you have a photo of the watch under the UV? Price?
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2022, 01:05 AM   #8
1665fan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,595
Service insert also
1665fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2022, 07:21 AM   #9
Filipćo
"TRF" Member
 
Filipćo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Filipe
Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah
Watch: Never too many
Posts: 1,898
Big pass
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot 2022-10-20 at 22.19.53.jpg (167.0 KB, 456 views)
Filipćo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2022, 07:37 AM   #10
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,800
For comparison, this is what those crown guards would have looked like originally.

I get that most 40-50 year-old watches have been polished, and often there's nothing wrong with that. But there are also watches with cases that have been butchered, and that 5512 that's for sale falls into that category.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 5512 Guards.jpg (280.2 KB, 450 views)
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2022, 05:14 AM   #11
fizz
"TRF" Member
 
fizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UAE
Posts: 370
Hello everyone, I hear what you've said about the case and it does seem over-polished (I did notice the near protruding spring bar and it's even more apparent in the next picture below).

I don't have a lume shot but did personally inspect under UV. It isn't dead but glows and fades immediately. I also don't have a picture of the case with the serial no between lugs but have seen it and it is the serial stated above (1.8x).

Here's a pic of the dial without the hands obstructing the text and hope that's much clearer than the earlier ones (click to see full resolution).

fizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 October 2022, 05:17 AM   #12
fizz
"TRF" Member
 
fizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UAE
Posts: 370
And, to those that have asked, the final price, after much intense haggling by my friend, is at USD 13k.
fizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2022, 06:44 AM   #13
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,800
That case is absolutely shot. I wouldn't buy it at any price unless you plan on parting it out.
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2022, 01:17 PM   #14
hutch300
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jeff
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,310
That case is terrible. I hope he didn't buy it - haggling to 13k is still not even close.
hutch300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2022, 11:22 PM   #15
offrdmania
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,858
$13K is a lot for that $9k watch. It is going to require at least $1-2K in laser welding on that case along with a bracelet rebuild unless you have very small wrists.
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2022, 11:47 PM   #16
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
$13K is a lot for that $9k watch. It is going to require at least $1-2K in laser welding on that case along with a bracelet rebuild unless you have very small wrists.
Agree w the pricing, but, what’s wrong with the bracelet? It appears to have 12 links (possibly the 13th under the clasp) and, if anything, it would be too big for even a medium size wrist.
Kingface66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2022, 11:49 PM   #17
offrdmania
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Agree w the pricing, but, what’s wrong with the bracelet? It appears to have 12 links (possibly the 13th under the clasp) and, if anything, it would be too big for even a medium size wrist.

I may have counted that wrong, I thought it was a few links short


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2022, 11:59 PM   #18
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: 1966 Rolex 5513
Posts: 3,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by offrdmania View Post
I may have counted that wrong, I thought it was a few links short


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh, trust me, between trying to get through the morning without coffee (long story) my reading glasses totally sucking and being of a weak magnification, I had to count those links 37 times to make sure I wasn’t seeing things.
Kingface66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2022, 12:00 AM   #19
offrdmania
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
offrdmania's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
Oh, trust me, between trying to get through the morning without coffee (long story) my reading glasses totally sucking and being of a weak magnification, I had to count those links 37 times to make sure I wasn’t seeing things.

I glanced at it and saw the short side and figured it was a few down


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
TRF Member 11738
offrdmania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2022, 12:31 AM   #20
Ascari_2
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,272
While it's an addressable element, at 210 degrees of amplitude the movement is in dire need of service.
__________________
NAWCC Member
Ascari_2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2022, 06:02 AM   #21
fizz
"TRF" Member
 
fizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UAE
Posts: 370
Thank you, everyone, immensely grateful for the collective feedback.

While I've passed on the gist of it to my friend, he went and saw the watch in person today and may move ahead with it anyway...
fizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2022, 09:23 AM   #22
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by fizz View Post
Thank you, everyone, immensely grateful for the collective feedback.

While I've passed on the gist of it to my friend, he went and saw the watch in person today and may move ahead with it anyway...
As a friend, you should tie him down to prevent all movement. Take away his credit card. Remove all cash from his person. Get his bank accounts frozen.

There are so many better examples if he has his heart set on a 5512.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 November 2022, 04:32 AM   #23
fizz
"TRF" Member
 
fizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UAE
Posts: 370
So another (and hopefully final) update.

Common sense prevailed and my friend decided not to pursue this particular 5512. Your comments were invaluable (I sent him some of the response snippets and then he eventually read the whole thread) and he has decided to continue his search for either a 5513/5512/1680 and keep looking for the best specimen at the price he is realistically willing to spend.

This experience in dealing with the situation as it unfolded also made me realise something. When you've been looking for a watch for a long time and feel "priced out" by the market value of it (owing to your own self-imposed spending barriers), finding a watch that has an original dial, an original case and a (perhaps) put together "set" all locally available, even if they don't belong together, makes it seem very appealing. Part of this has to do with being able to aquire it immediately, after inspecting it in person, and the fact that ultimately, the watch is all original (even if it's cobbled together) is sufficiently satisfying to cure the collecting itch.
fizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
5512 , rolex , vintage


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.