Tried On The PAM 372

[PanosI]

It looks perfect on your wrist, Bo

Dalip, killer Gunny

Paul, here's a comparison pic of 372 and 216570

[dalip]

Originally Posted by PanosI

It looks perfect on your wrist, Bo

Dalip, killer Gunny

Paul, here's a comparison pic of 372 and 216570

Nice Panos

[Cru Jones]

Originally Posted by PanosI

It looks perfect on your wrist, Bo

Dalip, killer Gunny

Paul, here's a comparison pic of 372 and 216570

nice comparison shot, panos.

given the angle and positioning, the pic accentuates the 372's size compared to the explorer ii. if you have a moment, it would be great to flip the order of the watches, take a pic and then post both pictures. i think the dramatic size difference will be slightly less dramatic.

[PanosI]

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

nice comparison shot, panos.

given the angle and positioning, the pic accentuates the 372's size compared to the explorer ii. if you have a moment, it would be great to flip the order of the watches, take a pic and then post both pictures. i think the dramatic size difference will be slightly less dramatic.

Unfortunately i can't comply , Cru because i no longer own the 216570.
I traded it with my 312 but i wasn't ready to part with my 312, so i reversed the trade (one of the good things to trade with friends ).

But even if i could and having in mind that the 216570 has a lot of presence on the wrist the difference wouldn't be slightly less dramatic.

372 is a big watch and look in that pic, even the 44 Airman looks small besides it !!!!
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=239440

[Cru Jones]

Originally Posted by PanosI

Unfortunately i can't comply , Cru because i no longer own the 216570.
I traded it with my 312 but i wasn't ready to part with my 312, so i reversed the trade (one of the good things to trade with friends ).

But even if i could and having in mind that the 216570 has a lot of presence on the wrist the difference wouldn't be slightly less dramatic.

372 is a big watch and look in that pic, even the 44 Airman looks small besides it !!!!
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=239440

ooops! sorry, didn't realize you didn't have the watch anymore.

[H2F]

Gotta say it looks awesome on your wrist! Er... Congrats in order? :D

[andrew79]

looks good mine says hello....

[SPACE-DWELLER]

It's definately worth considering now that vegetable tanned straps are availible...

In THEORY, I shouldn't react allergically to those straps since no Chromium was used in the tanning process but I've yet to try wearing a vegetable tanned strap... must say I'm a bit reluctant / sceptical since I'd hate to get that rash again.

[TSW]

Love the 372!!

[Travelller]

Originally Posted by dalip

...and the dial keeps pulling you in...

Hell man, that strap of yours keeps pulling me in - sweet

[dalip]

Originally Posted by Travelller

Hell man, that strap of yours keeps pulling me in - sweet

Thanks

[Watchcraze007]

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

It's definately worth considering now that vegetable tanned straps are availible...

In THEORY, I shouldn't react allergically to those straps since no Chromium was used in the tanning process but I've yet to try wearing a vegetable tanned strap... must say I'm a bit reluctant / sceptical since I'd hate to get that rash again.

Hell yeah... I will never put money in a chromium one! a) health reasons and b) I realized how that unnatural material does not give good "vintage look" to the leather c) get real broken-in vintage!

[Watchcraze007]

Originally Posted by Travelller

Hell man, that strap of yours keeps pulling me in - sweet

Looks likes a lot of chromium in there :) certainly prefer real vintage

[mailman]

Originally Posted by PanosI

It looks perfect on your wrist, Bo

Dalip, killer Gunny

Paul, here's a comparison pic of 372 and 216570

Thanks Panos