ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 August 2013, 09:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 477
|
Regulating a Rolex by position
There has been a a lot written over the years about how leaving a mechanical watch one way or the other in a resting position (e.g., dial or crown up/down) will cause the watch to run faster or slower.
What are your Rolex experiences in this regard? In which position does the watch run fastest or slowest? How much variation (in seconds per day) have you noticed by position or compared with time on your wrist? Thanks. John |
10 August 2013, 09:29 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,937
|
FYI:
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
10 August 2013, 09:58 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 477
|
Thanks Peters. In addition to this written material, what are your personal experiences with self-regulating a Rolex? Oddly, I have one that loses time on my wrist but gains time crown up.
John |
10 August 2013, 10:02 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,177
|
IMO the Rolex guide on this issue is just that, a guide. Each watch will react a little differently. I have an M series EXP II and a G series DJ. Both will gain a second overnight in the face up position. With crown up, both will lose a second. Resting them crown down has zero effect. Therefore, my two models seemingly react the same. This is fine with me since both will gain a second during a day's wearing time so I can regulate them very easily. In my case this consistency is probably just the luck of the draw.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
10 August 2013, 10:49 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,828
|
It makes very little difference with my Sub at all. With my Omega and DOXA I can self regulate by a couple seconds either way but the Rolex stays the same no matter what. I just wear it 24/7 now so it really doesn't matter... looses about .7 second per 24 hours.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
10 August 2013, 11:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,423
|
Has more of an effect on older Rolex. I doubt it affects modern movements significantly. I could be wrong.
|
10 August 2013, 11:28 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: SEIKO
Posts: 28,362
|
Same
My Milgauss gains a little under one second/24hrs whichever way it lies overnight.
|
10 August 2013, 12:38 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Singapore
Watch: Sky/Sea/Land
Posts: 681
|
my DSSD with my wear pattern is doing -2 sec per day... after placing it face up I am able to reset the difference slowly... currently it is +1 sec after a week
Explorer II only -1 sec when I wear it to sleep... weird |
10 August 2013, 12:48 PM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
|
Quote:
|
|
10 August 2013, 02:31 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
While I am not too anal about precise timing, to answer the OP - laying both my new and older watches overnight in the different positions does alter the timing as Rolex suggests. Good luck...
|
10 August 2013, 04:52 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,266
|
Quite true but why worry about a second or two out of 86400 in a day.Last time I checked my wearing watch was two weeks ago just checked now its less than a minute fast.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
10 August 2013, 06:00 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Netherlands
Watch: 1655+216570
Posts: 497
|
Quote:
A colleague at work had problems with her DJ and told her this method and she also noticed that after a few night the watch ran slower. Biggest problem is that you have to take your watch of for the night! Regards |
|
10 August 2013, 06:08 PM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,281
|
|
10 August 2013, 07:01 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Porto and the UK
Watch: 114060
Posts: 176
|
my 114060 (3130 mov't) =
will gain about +1 sec if left dial up for approx. 16 hrs it will drop -1 sec if left crown down for the same time crown up doesn't seem to do anything either way using this method, my watch is within 1 sec of the atomic clock after 4 weeks since it was set for what it's worth.... my rolex sits longer on the dresser at the weekend, so I tend to leave it crown down every night (as it runs faster on the wrist) and then on a Friday if I'm inclined to check the timing (which I usually am!!) then I make call whether it needs to be left face up or crown down over the longer periods of not being worn on the weekend |
10 August 2013, 07:41 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Peter
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: 214270 Mk2
Posts: 1,937
|
Get one of these and then you won't worry about a few seconds here or there:
__________________
2016 Explorer 214270 Mk2 - 1996 Submariner 14060* - 1972 Datejust 1601 1972 Oyster Perpetual 1002 - 1978 Oysterquartz 17000 Omega Seamaster 2265.80 - Omega Seamaster 300 166.0324 *RIP PAL 1942-2015 |
10 August 2013, 07:58 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 1,330
|
|
10 August 2013, 08:01 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,266
|
Yes all mechanical movements are basically built the same with the same age old problem the effect of gravity.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
10 August 2013, 08:08 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Dan
Location: UK
Watch: 116528
Posts: 1,049
|
From experience, the modern Rolex is more prone to temperature changes than anything else. When you take it off, it cools down and this is likely what is causing the variations and not the position itself.
|
10 August 2013, 09:05 PM | #19 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 71,828
|
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
10 August 2013, 10:20 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
|
|
10 August 2013, 10:22 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Florida
Watch: YG President
Posts: 2,090
|
Thats interesting Dan...I cannot say I've noticed but I'm going to check. I'm always in 90 degrees one minute then 70 degree office etc etc...
|
10 August 2013, 10:37 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
Great information about self regulation.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
10 August 2013, 11:37 PM | #23 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 40,725
|
The whole self regulation thing can be skipped with a good watch winder
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
12 August 2013, 02:26 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 1,330
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.