![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
TechXpert & 2016 Patron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mx
Posts: 1,572
|
Case back thickness
Hi guys
On an earlier thread the water resistance rating on GMT versus Submariner came to question, so I did some research on my own on the differences in the tickness of the case back. I will have to add to this list as the watches come into my shop for repair, but this is what I got so far from the watches I'm currently working on. Please keep in mind, the mm gauge I'm using is old, and might not be accurate up to 0.02mm. GMT Master 16750 - 0.72mm Submariner 16610 - 1.51mm (more than twice the tickness of the old GMT) Lady's DJ (older) 69174 - 0.50mm Lady's DJ (newer) 79174 - 0.49mm Gent's DJ (older) 16013 - 0.75mm Gent's DJ (newer) 16233 - 0.81mm
__________________
Member# 5731 Instagram: @vanessa.cw21 Watch my Rolex repair video: https://youtu.be/jDnaotCTpTA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 650
|
Any info on the SD 4000???
Thanks. SNB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
TechXpert & 2016 Patron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mx
Posts: 1,572
|
Nope, this info isn't posted anywhere by my knowledge. The numbers I posted are the ones I measured today on watches that I have in for repair. I doubt I'll see the DSSD anytime soon for repair!
__________________
Member# 5731 Instagram: @vanessa.cw21 Watch my Rolex repair video: https://youtu.be/jDnaotCTpTA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 650
|
Thanks for the info...by 'SD 4000' I meant the CLASSIC SD...not the DSSD.
These darn SD's just keep on ticking! ![]() SNB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Great info! As we discussed, it will be interesting so see what a 116710 or the like has for thickness in contrast.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
TechXpert & 2016 Patron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mx
Posts: 1,572
|
Oops, sorry! All these numbers got me confused! You're right, but I won't ever have a SD in repair, because those go to the factory anyways. I do not have the equipment to test to 4000ft so I cannot get parts for it...
__________________
Member# 5731 Instagram: @vanessa.cw21 Watch my Rolex repair video: https://youtu.be/jDnaotCTpTA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Michael
Location: Australia
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 1,756
|
Hiya Vanessa... Tx for the info... :-)
__________________
:-) "Be the change you would like to see in the world." - Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Jason
Location: at home
Posts: 5,098
|
Very useful information, Vanessa, especially the bit about not being able to test the SD.
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
|
Quote:
The Sub caseback thickness of 1.51 mm is impressive. By the same token, can we assume that the caseback thickness of the YM (40 mm) would be the same as the Sub? Thanks - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! ![]() I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2023 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
isn't YM's WR rating 100m as well? I checked the thickness using naked eye between my Sub and my GMT, there is visible difference. Also, I compare it with a Daytona from a friend, Sub's caseback was also thicker than daytona visibly.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Great info! Thanks. Please continue to update your list. I am one of the curious!
Best, A |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2023 ROLEX EXPLORER 40 x2 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,404
|
Thanks Vanessa,
So GMT iic case back ? Sorry for being a pain |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly area
Posts: 5,596
|
Vanessa, thanks for the info.
How about the 14060M? Same as the 16610? Somewhere I saw that the case thickness of the 14060M is .2mm thinner than the 16610.
__________________
Adam |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
|
Great info ..........thanks!
![]() ![]()
__________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95) Rolex SS GMT IIc (08) Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..) Rolex Explorer II Blk (91) Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07) Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
|
Quote:
I remembered to measure the caseback thickness before I put her back together. 0.84mm I can also confirm, this is the same thickness as the 16710 or 16718 casebacks. (See photo) ![]()
__________________
IG@Construction_Time --- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.