![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: MY Metro Area
Watch: Rolex Milgauss,
Posts: 233
|
Submariner vs Submariner Date
So I'm sure this topic has been beat to death. But I was told by someone that the real submariner was the date version. And then there is the no date.
I always thought the true sub was the no date one. Then they created the date to make it more "office" friendly. Which is true? Also which do you guys prefer? I have to go with the 5 digit Submariner. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2023 ROLEX EXPLORER 40 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,897
|
There is no Sub No Date.
There is the Sub, and the Sub Date. The ‘someone’ you speak of doesn’t know what they’re talking about. If I’m not mistaken, the 1680 in the late 1960’s was the first date model. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2023 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,895
|
![]()
__________________
Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Glashutte Senator Exellence, Rolex 116710 GMT Master II BLNR, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: David
Location: Chicago
Watch: SkyD,JC, BLNR, Ex2
Posts: 1,578
|
Quote:
And he wanted to know which Sub came out first as the original Rolex submariner. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2023 ROLEX EXPLORER 40 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,897
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: David
Location: Chicago
Watch: SkyD,JC, BLNR, Ex2
Posts: 1,578
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
2023 ROLEX EXPLORER 40 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,897
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
The Submariner came first, followed by the Submariner Date. Which one is "real" is subjective, and in my opinion, a pointless consideration. My personal preference is for the Date.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,650
|
Both real both awesome.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
|
If I go on a date with my girlfriend and we're both wearing a Submariner, is that a Submariner date?
What if we visit a decommissioned submarine on our date but aren't wearing Submariners at the time? Would that just be a submarine date? And, what if we stay home instead of going out but are still both wearing Submariners? Would that be a Submariner no-date? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
2023 ROLEX EXPLORER 40 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 5,897
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,171
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 244
|
Date for me. No date feels like something is missing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
2023 ROLEX SS DAYTONA Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116900
Posts: 34,218
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,481
|
Sub started it all, date was added later. I'd go date for office work, but I like having the date easily accessible.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Reno
Watch: SMUUURF
Posts: 383
|
The date is very useful. The cyclops is effective.
I kinda wish there was a day indicator as well. It is the day of the week I have a hard time with. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hawaii
Watch: 16600 et al
Posts: 158
|
No Date all the way!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 164
|
Went back and forth forever, but decided on no date. I found the symmetry made it look much more beautiful. I wasn't a fan of how it was hard to read the hands when they passed behind the cyclops and the date was tough to read if you weren't looking straight on. Also, the cyclops caught dirt pretty easily around the outer edge.
Tons of people get the date, and I agree that it's iconic, but for my tastes it was ND all the way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Boca Raton
Watch: 228235, PP 5167
Posts: 114
|
i would go with ND(sub)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: MY Metro Area
Watch: Rolex Milgauss,
Posts: 233
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LBSF
Watch: ing the grass grow
Posts: 686
|
Submariner.
Sublime. ![]() Sent from my MI 5 using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,037
|
The very first Sub had no date (developed in 1953, but not available to the public until 1954) followed later by the date version (1966, reference 1680). There is much info on the web from various sources, the following link is decent though:
https://www.fratellowatches.com/role...riner-history/ Submariner is arguably the most iconic of Rolex's sports watches with a great history. Cheers! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Michigan
Watch: 16610
Posts: 319
|
Submariner vs Submariner Date
I found the cyclops to be iconic for me. So Sub date is what I had to have.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 288
|
I would go with the sub. I have had both 5 and 6 digit references, can’t go wrong with either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Netherlands/Spain
Watch: Sea-Dweller 116600
Posts: 1,030
|
For me the no date looks slightly better, but the date obviously offers a bit more. The date is very handy.
__________________
Rolex.c6 Sea-Dweller 4000 SD4K Ref. 116600 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 5,150
|
Sometimes it's a useful term for the sake of clarity. It's kind of like saying Explorer I, just so people know you're not talking about the Explorer II. Technically it's incorrect, but if it helps avoid confusion in a discussion, it might be the lesser of the two evils.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
2023 ROLEX SS DAYTONA Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,008
|
Sub!
![]() Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
2023 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,642
|
They are both awesome it is just personal preference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
TRF Moderator & 2023 SS DAYTONA Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Connor MacLeod
Location: Glenfinnan
Watch: Yes
Posts: 63,011
|
Submariner for me!
![]()
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.