ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 November 2024, 09:00 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Explorer 39 vs 40...anybody with a strong preference?
I am a long time Explorer (and Explorer II) wearer....Hence my screen name. I am taking delivery of a new Explorer 40 tomorrow. I'm super excited of course. In watching videos comparing the two, they look so similiar that I can barely tell the difference. Hence my question, does anyone have a strong preference for one over the other? Please share thoughts and photos. Thanks!
|
13 November 2024, 09:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Florida
Watch: Hulk
Posts: 475
|
I have the 40mm .. Wider Bracelet and Clasp. Gloss Dial. Anti-Reflective Crystal. 70 Hour Reserve... however .. its actually still 39 mm ... Some people are annoyed by the Explorer wording moving to the top portion of the dial .. However . that goes back to the original Explorers placement so for nostalgia its the correct place for it.
__________________
. Hulk / RootBeer / Explorer |
13 November 2024, 09:20 AM | #3 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Quote:
|
|
13 November 2024, 09:22 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Note that the model name is at 12 o’clock on both. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
13 November 2024, 03:07 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,418
|
I have the 39mm, Mk 2. I prefer the matte dial as well as the 20mm lug width. I also like the “Explorer” text on the lower half of the dial; it balances it out nicely. And of course, the workhorse, the tried-and-true 3132 movement inside.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
13 November 2024, 03:37 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,237
|
I think the 39mm Explorer 214270 is the best iteration of the explorer in its entire production line history. Just my biased opinion.
__________________
The perfect blossom is a rare thing. You could spend your life looking for one, and it would not be a wasted life. |
13 November 2024, 04:51 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 467
|
36, 39, 40...I really think it comes down to personal preference as they are all lovely watches...
I happen to have the 39mm version and it fits my 8 inch wrist like a glove... In my 40 plus years of wearing a Rolex of one kind or another, it is without a doubt the most comfortable Rolex I have ever had. And I prefer the placement of the text on this version... I'm not sure why Rolex discontinued the 39mm version as it wears much more like a 40mm piece anyway in my opinion... And the 3100 caliber movements have all stood the test of time (No pun intended)... IMG_9885.JPG |
13 November 2024, 05:05 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,649
|
I had the 39mm MK2, but I traded it in for another watch last year. If I get another Explorer in the future, I’d go for the 39mm again. I loved the matte dial and the Explorer text at 6 o’clock. Of course, I’d love to own a 1016 as well.
|
13 November 2024, 07:46 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,694
|
I’ve had the 39mm and the 40mm. Currently own the 40mm.
As of a couple of weeks ago I would have been 39 leaning. I just couldn’t get the 40mm to fit right. That is until I added a Submariner half link. In terms of fit, the 39mm is right out of the box. The thing just works. 40mm required a little patience and work but now that I’ve achieved the right fit, I couldn’t go back to a 39mm. I’ve been really enjoying the larger proportions.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | IWC | Omega | Rolex | Seiko | |
13 November 2024, 07:59 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270
Posts: 341
|
39mm; thinner rehaut looks better.
__________________
214270 - 124273 - 16710 |
13 November 2024, 11:39 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,011
|
I don't have a strong preference, but I do like the wider bracelet of the 40. It's basically the same bracelet as the 12-series sub, which I really like, maybe my favorite of the 6 digit era.
By the way, congrats! I think you'll find it's a great watch. |
13 November 2024, 11:52 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,914
|
Congratulations in advance looking forward to hearing your thoughts
I like the gloss dial of the 40, so that’d be my preference |
14 November 2024, 09:23 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7
|
My friend has the older 39 and I recently acquired a 40. What drew me to the 40 was the gloss dial and the wider bracelet. I do like the location of the “Explorer” text on the 39.
|
14 November 2024, 01:10 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Awesome pic! A 1016 would be amazing. I stopped looking because they were so far outside of my budget, but they are amazing.
|
14 November 2024, 01:13 PM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
I've had it for about 12 hours now....First thing that I noticed was the wider bracelet. I realize that's a negative for some, but I absolutely prefer it! Same with the matte (39) vs glossy (40) dial. Part of the reason I wanted to go with the 40 is my favorite pics are when the dial looks dark black. Combined with the AR coating, this deep black dial is amazing! Couldn't be happier!
|
14 November 2024, 01:17 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Thanks so much Brian! I have to take a day or two to let it sink it, but I definitely have thoughts. It also occured to me that in a hobby of millimeters (lug-to-lug, thickness, diameter, etc), there is no better topic of conversation than comparing two nearly identical (to the average person) watches, that to us are completely different!
|
14 November 2024, 01:19 PM | #17 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,914
|
Quote:
That’s exactly right … the minute details are what make this hobby so interesting Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
14 November 2024, 01:19 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
A couple of quick unsized pics to get a look at the bracelet and dial. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 November 2024, 01:22 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: California
Posts: 68
|
Go smaller even better, Go 36mm
|
14 November 2024, 01:44 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 466
|
I own the MK II and the newest 36mm explorer.
On both new models I prefer the gloss black dial, the AR coating and longer Power reserve. While I initially preferred the lower placement of the explorer text when I was wearing it the dial felt too bottom heavy visually. I now prefer the Explorer up top text. When comparing the 39mm and 40 mm I prefer the longer skinnier hour hand on the 40mm with the longer tip as well. Both wonderful watches but I prefer the changes on the new versions. Enjoy yours. ..Explorer, Spring Diver & APRO.. |
14 November 2024, 01:51 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,649
|
Thanks. I forgot to mention one thing I like more on the 40mm compared to the 39mm: the larger crown. I believe they used the crown from the 36mm pieces on the Explorer 39.
|
14 November 2024, 01:55 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,649
|
Check out the crown size difference
From left to right: 39,36, and 40 |
14 November 2024, 03:06 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,250
|
Have had 39 and 40 mm variants of the Explorer. Wonderful watch, comfortable, easily legible. Didn’t notice much of a difference between the two on the wrist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
t65tampa |
14 November 2024, 04:41 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Michael
Location: Kuwait
Watch: Daytona SS White
Posts: 496
|
I have the 39 Mark II, and would still chose it over the 40...I prefer the matt dial and previous generation movement.
__________________
116520 Daytona white, 116500 Daytona black, 126600 SD, Speedmaster Pro, 116710BLNR GMT II, Speedmaster trilogy 57, Breitling Navitimer A23322, Seiko SKX007J, Seiko Mini turtle PADI, Seiko 5 Sport Diver. |
15 November 2024, 04:30 AM | #25 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
Quote:
Nice that if you prefer matte or glossy they have you covered. |
|
15 November 2024, 04:32 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
|
15 November 2024, 04:55 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,252
|
My favourite
Is this one
|
15 November 2024, 10:09 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
|
|
15 November 2024, 10:25 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,574
|
Had the 39 as well as 36.
The 39 dial departed from the balance. I believe the 40 recaptured a better balance to the dial.
__________________
|
15 November 2024, 09:47 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: .
Posts: 389
|
All Explorer I models 36, 39, and 40 are good looking watches, each model has its own strength and cons but they all share the same DNA and they are more alike than different.
As for Explorer I 40mm, I like the glossy dial better, it has more luxury look (39 mm matte is more toolish) and the big crown is a nice upgrade. Also, watch dimensions thickness, case, and bracelet are better proportioned. As for the Explorer wording, I think since the dail is bigger than the 39mm, placing it up will make the dial look busier rather than looking too plain and this is subjective. |
Tags |
explorer |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.