The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 August 2019, 05:04 AM   #1
bitboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: California
Posts: 6
1530 vs. 17000

Hi Folks,

I’m relatively new here, but would love to get some opinions. I’ve already collected a 1675 and 1680 that I love, and find myself strongly attracted to the 1530/17000 steel model. I know the looks are polarizing and it’s a matter of personal taste, but I really love it!

I’ll caveat my next question by saying that I generally prefer automatic watches and have no interest in starting a quartz vs. automatic debate - but what do folks think about the 1530 vs. 17000 in terms of collectibility?

The production numbers on the 1530 are clearly lower than the 17000, but the Oysterquartz is also a unique odd duck in Rolex’s product catalog and also has a rare appeal.

Thoughts?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bitboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 07:26 AM   #2
dbhak22
2024 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,994
So you're talking about the Oysterquartz Date (ref. 1530) and the Oysterquartz Datejust (ref. 17000). I'd say in general, Datejust > Date. Personally, I'd hunt down a 17000 but specifically the Mk1 dials that are one of the simplest dial designs in Rolex history; only 3 lines of text. Love the overall simple dial matched with the integrated case/bracelet design.
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 08:08 AM   #3
Mr.Rolex1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Mike
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 1,197
The value of production numbers pales in comparison to demand.
They are collectible amongst true fans but they are not sought after enough to command a premium or incite appreciation.

You have a great collection so far and I think one of them would look great alongside either of them.
Mr.Rolex1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 08:13 AM   #4
mbc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
So you're talking about the Oysterquartz Date (ref. 1530) and the Oysterquartz Datejust (ref. 17000). I'd say in general, Datejust > Date. Personally, I'd hunt down a 17000 but specifically the Mk1 dials that are one of the simplest dial designs in Rolex history; only 3 lines of text. Love the overall simple dial matched with the integrated case/bracelet design.


The 1530 is not an Oysterquartz it is a Datejust. I’ve happily got two of them both just back from Phillip Ridley!

Still think the Oysterquartz is nice as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 08:14 AM   #5
mbc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
Sorry, meant Oyster Perpetual Date


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 08:15 AM   #6
bitboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: California
Posts: 6
Yes, exactly, thanks for your opinion.

I’m leaning towards hunting down a 17000 but I’m having to overcome my quartz bias!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bitboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 08:17 AM   #7
bitboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: California
Posts: 6
That’s one way to solve the dilemma, buy both! Very nice watches BTW!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bitboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 August 2019, 08:35 AM   #8
JustinK
2024 Pledge Member
 
JustinK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Justin
Location: Jupiter, FL
Watch: 1530,1665,1680
Posts: 2,055
As far as collectibility I think the 1530 is by far more collectible and “rare”. You will pay more for a nice 1530 than a nice 17000. I have owned both and kept my 1530 rather than the 17000 as I felt the 1530 would appreciate more in time.

I do think the oysterquartz will have its day, they are incredible watches for a very reasonable sum. Only issue is servicing them which is only through Rolex so expensive. With that said I have owned three and never had a problem with any of them.

I would recommend both, you have dial options with the 17000 if colors appeal to you.

JustinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2019, 12:52 AM   #9
erlendh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 27
A nice 1530 goes for between $6500-ish and $9000, while you can get a 17000 for under $3000. I love both, but the 1530 is far more collectable (and easier to service). Have a 17000 and am on constant lookout for a 1530, but the condition, price, location and timing haven’t matched for me ... yet ...

For a 17000, MK1 dial is more collectable.
erlendh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2019, 02:23 AM   #10
Vlad
"TRF" Member
 
Vlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
I would go for 1530s - beautiful watches, easy to service. Some of the dials have gorgeous cream patina. To avoid future issues, as this has not been settled yet (as far as I know), if you decide to buy a 1530, get it with a 96660 bracelet.
Vlad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2019, 03:22 AM   #11
erlendh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 27
I second this! 96660 bracelet is important!
erlendh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2019, 06:04 AM   #12
ud101
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: US
Posts: 145
I would go with the 17000.
ud101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 August 2019, 10:15 AM   #13
bitboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: California
Posts: 6
I appreciate all the opinions. Although I do love that 1530 beveled dial, I found a 17000 (all silver, box & papers) that I simply couldn’t pass up. I’ll be sure to post pics when it arrives!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bitboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2019, 12:27 PM   #14
jmazpiazu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Miami, USA
Watch: Rolex 1530
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitboy View Post
I appreciate all the opinions. Although I do love that 1530 beveled dial, I found a 17000 (all silver, box & papers) that I simply couldn’t pass up. I’ll be sure to post pics when it arrives!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
You are going to love the 17000. Both the 17000 and the 1530 are great references. My 1975 1530 says hi!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1530-3.jpg (249.1 KB, 307 views)
File Type: jpg 1530-4.jpg (265.6 KB, 307 views)
jmazpiazu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 August 2019, 04:45 PM   #15
bitboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: California
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmazpiazu View Post
You are going to love the 17000. Both the 17000 and the 1530 are great references. My 1975 1530 says hi!


Looks fantastic!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bitboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2019, 08:13 AM   #16
mbc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
Just a 1530 caution re: parts

I've learned the hard way that Rolex doesn't support the 1530 anymore, so even if you wanted a service dial, they're not available.

The part most prone to need replacement is the chapter ring and sourcing a used, decent condition one can take a long time...so don't buy a banged up one thinking you can source parts as easy as it is to source an mk3 bezel for a 5513 -- money isn't the only impediment...

I ended up souring a chapter ring for one of my 1530s from a great seller over at VRF from Europe...
mbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 August 2019, 10:46 AM   #17
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,354
Both great watches. The RSC serviced my 17000 without problems a couple of years ago.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2019, 12:57 PM   #18
bitboy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: California
Posts: 6
My 17000 arrived today and it’s better than I had imagined, the case and bracelet seem almost new and it has a really satisfying heft and wrist presence despite being only 36mm.

...needless to say I’m in love!

When I size the bracelet I’ll share some wrist shots.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
bitboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2019, 08:23 AM   #19
dbhak22
2024 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbc View Post
Sorry, meant Oyster Perpetual Date

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, thank you so much, I clearly got confused. Another difference that I don't see mentioned here is the sound of the Oysterquartz (17000). I was very surprised at how "loud" the quartz movement is. The ticking sounds like you have a small drip in your sink faucet at night.
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2019, 08:23 AM   #20
dbhak22
2024 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 2,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitboy View Post
My 17000 arrived today and it’s better than I had imagined, the case and bracelet seem almost new and it has a really satisfying heft and wrist presence despite being only 36mm.

...needless to say I’m in love!

When I size the bracelet I’ll share some wrist shots.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Nicely done, congrats, :)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 October 2019, 03:51 AM   #21
mbc
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 620
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbc View Post
The 1530 is not an Oysterquartz it is a Datejust. I’ve happily got two of them both just back from Phillip Ridley!

Still think the Oysterquartz is nice as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reviving this thread with a story. I sold the 1530 on the left a little while ago to a friend who had decided it's not his thing -- if anyone is seriously pursuing a 1530, please PM me and i'll put you in touch.

Mods -- feel free to remove if this isn't appropriate here.

Thanks
mbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.