The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 September 2005, 05:36 PM   #31
Gedanken
"TRF" Member
 
Gedanken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani
Probably, the only thing that puts people off buying OQs, is the high cost involvement each time the battery needs to be replaced.

We are looking at the cost of the battery as well as re-sealing and waterproofing the watch. Can add up to quite a bit.

JJ
I don't know if that's all there is to it, JJ. One other thing to consider is the movement of the second hand.

Even before quartz movements came about, Rolex already tried a "dead beat" (one beat per second) movement in 1954's Tru-Beat, and it was not popular with the Rolex buying crowd. I think the fact that cheap, deadbeat quartz movements (pun intended) behave in the same way was the final nail in the coffin.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.
Gedanken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2005, 05:46 PM   #32
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodwatch
My Rolex dealer in Rotterdam offered lifetime battery replacement free of charge. Now they don't sell Qysterquartz anymore.

Take care,

Frans.
Your Rolex dealer in Rotterdam is then one helluva guy. I've never heard of any Rolex dealer giving such a generous offer.
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2005, 05:49 PM   #33
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56
And a replacement Rolex quartz movement is a lot more expensive than its
mechanical equiv-able.
Very true....if something goes seriously wrong with that quartz movment, then you are well and truly screwed. A mechanical watch is easier to fix with readily available parts. With the OQ, you might find yourself in very deep sh!t if something does go wrong with the circuitry.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2005, 02:42 AM   #34
molex
"TRF" Member
 
molex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 220
Well, maybe, but...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani
With the OQ, you might find yourself in very deep sh!t if something does go wrong with the circuitry.
Rolex guarantees a parts supply for discontinued watches for a staggering 30 years after they are discontinued. Several folks have convinced me the OQ was discontinued in 2003, so I'll be around 62 when they finally refuse to work on my OQ, if I still even have it by then.

I guess I feal comfortable with that
__________________
"Through the tool watch, Rolex became allied not just with dependability and accuracy, but with great human achievement."
Vintage Rolex Sports Models
Skeet & Urul
molex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 September 2005, 05:17 AM   #35
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by molex
Rolex guarantees a parts supply for discontinued watches for a staggering 30 years after they are discontinued. Several folks have convinced me the OQ was discontinued in 2003, so I'll be around 62 when they finally refuse to work on my OQ, if I still even have it by then.

I guess I feal comfortable with that
Thanks, Micah, I didn't know about this parts guarantee on the OQ was over such a long period of time.

Just hang on to yours, mate, it's a cracker!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.