The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 June 2022, 01:29 AM   #1
Erpin
"TRF" Member
 
Erpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Eric
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex DRSD
Posts: 663
Isn’t it a fact that exclamation mark dial have less potent radium lumes? I am attaching this article from the Rolex Passion Report about exclamation mark dials as a reference.

https://rolexpassionreport.com/316/t...ing-radiation/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Erpin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2022, 10:19 AM   #2
1watch
"TRF" Member
 
1watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
My 1963 GMT 1675 with Silver Dial?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erpin View Post
Isn’t it a fact that exclamation mark dial have less potent radium lumes? I am attaching this article from the Rolex Passion Report about exclamation mark dials as a reference.

https://rolexpassionreport.com/316/t...ing-radiation/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, exclamation dials had a less potent radium mix prior to the transition to tritium with the underline dial. That said, I would expect a reading in at least the higher single digits if the counter is placed correctly over the crystal. As a side note, the less expensive Radex counters that max out at 9.99 aren’t very useful for accurate readings on ‘60 and earlier radium dials imo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 June 2022, 12:56 PM   #3
LateLearner
"TRF" Member
 
LateLearner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: USA
Watch: 5513, 16750, AK
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1watch View Post
Yes, exclamation dials had a less potent radium mix prior to the transition to tritium with the underline dial. That said, I would expect a reading in at least the higher single digits if the counter is placed correctly over the crystal. As a side note, the less expensive Radex counters that max out at 9.99 aren’t very useful for accurate readings on ‘60 and earlier radium dials imo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

As a newbie, nothing I post is meant to be taken as guidance—only as my introductory experiences.

The next level Geiger above a Radex RD1530, appears to be more than $200, some much more expensive.

The RD1530 maxes out at 9.99. Therefore, older watches with significant radium should be measured with a better, and more expensive Geiger.

I purchased the cheapest Geiger, merely to determine whether my relumed 1965 5513 was tritium or radium. Sadly, it’s radium.

Also, taking different readings on video, I discovered how slight distances from the crystal affect the readings.

For me, the owner of an inherited 1965 Sub 5513 with (unfortunately) a radium relume, the discussion about Geiger readings on this forum is underrepresented.

It’s my hope I can help generate discussion and shared knowledge about radium.

I’d like to know what Geiger devices are used when posting about microsieverts per hour readings.

They are still out there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LateLearner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Bernard Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.