ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

drainaps · 31 October 2011, 11:54 AM

Good morning,

In my quest for a white 1680 (I let pass a previous piece as per fellow Boardmembers' advice on watch state and price) I have come across the enclosed. Serial no 6.1 Million. Bracelet is "Heavy Oyster, Double Fliplock" as per the seller. No other pics yet and I know this one is not high-resolution.

I would appreciate comments on:

i) Dial
ii) Bezel
iii)What would be the period-correct bracelet for this watch.

Thanks a million,

matt4hand · 31 October 2011, 12:19 PM

We need better pictures.

drainaps · 31 October 2011, 08:55 PM

Now w High-rez pics. Please guys help.

Submarino · 31 October 2011, 11:02 PM

Not sure about the hands and it should come with a non-solid link bracelet for the time period. Bracelet if original to the watch should be light and rattly. Unless you are looking at a safe queen where bracelet will have minimal to no stretch.

Michael M. · 31 October 2011, 11:06 PM

1680 whites were sold on 93150's (solid link) so, this one may be correct. Also, the hands look to be newer luminova replacements.

Beaumont Miller II · 1 November 2011, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael m.

1680 whites were sold on 93150's (solid link) so, this one may be correct. Also, the hands look to be newer luminova replacements.

x2

onkyo · 1 November 2011, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beaumont Miller II

x2

x3.... luminova hands (except seconds hands which may be original)

fernandoml · 1 November 2011, 01:48 AM

dial someone can say something.
not a MK1 not a MK2, 3.4
to dial it?

hennabav · 1 November 2011, 03:34 AM

Hands don't seem to be original. Case is rather polished and not very crisp. The crown is quite polished down too where the logo is no longer showing well or crisp.

Submarino · 1 November 2011, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael M.

1680 whites were sold on 93150's (solid link) so, this one may be correct. Also, the hands look to be newer luminova replacements.

Michael is damn right! My apologies, I just can't stop thinking of the right bracelet for GMTs.

31 October 2011, 11:02 PM	#4
Submarino "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Mr. H Location: Dallas Watch: them for me! Posts: 7,180	Not sure about the hands and it should come with a non-solid link bracelet for the time period. Bracelet if original to the watch should be light and rattly. Unless you are looking at a safe queen where bracelet will have minimal to no stretch. __________________ WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

31 October 2011, 12:19 PM	#2
matt4hand Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Matt Location: Atlanta Watch: Tramp Posts: 2,369	We need better pictures.

31 October 2011, 11:06 PM	#5
Michael M. Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Newport Beach, CA Posts: 8,391	1680 whites were sold on 93150's (solid link) so, this one may be correct. Also, the hands look to be newer luminova replacements.

1 November 2011, 01:48 AM	#8
fernandoml "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: madrid Posts: 1	dial someone can say something. not a MK1 not a MK2, 3.4 to dial it?

1 November 2011, 03:34 AM	#9
hennabav Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jon Location: New England Watch: --Rolex-- Posts: 2,391	Hands don't seem to be original. Case is rather polished and not very crisp. The crown is quite polished down too where the logo is no longer showing well or crisp.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)