ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rwsimbulan · 1 May 2018, 10:27 PM

Found this on a local ad and asking price is 4000CAD.
Seller claims authentic..
Box looks a little shady but I’m no Rolex expert.
What do you all think?

JayB · 1 May 2018, 10:35 PM

Too good to be true? Yes it is

Terrible pictures but looks like a poor fake to me

edweather · 1 May 2018, 10:36 PM

date not magnifying....fake

rwsimbulan · 1 May 2018, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayB

Too good to be true? Yes it is

Terrible pictures but looks fake to me

Do you have a reason why it looks fake?

JayB · 1 May 2018, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rwsimbulan

Do you have a reason why it looks fake?

Generally as a forum we don't list details, all I will say is compare with the images on the Rolex website and a few things will jump out immediately.

Also as I said the images are a very poor quality, ask for better images if not sure

cwieb · 1 May 2018, 10:45 PM

Not authentic.

rwsimbulan · 1 May 2018, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayB

Generally as a forum we don't list details, all I will say is compare with the images on the Rolex website and a few things will jump out immediately.

Also as I said the images are a very poor quality, ask for better images if not sure

Ok thank you... I’ll try to look closer but it is also a 2004 watch

JayB · 1 May 2018, 10:46 PM

One detail I will give, the Serial number F437091 is a well known fake, always worth typing the number into Google as you never know what might come up

rwsimbulan · 1 May 2018, 10:53 PM

Wow ok thank you everyone

PRSWILL · 2 May 2018, 12:59 AM

the box is also wrong on that year of watch...

GradyPhilpott · 2 May 2018, 01:05 AM

Take a pass on that one.

jvmartin · 2 May 2018, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PRSWILL

the box is also wrong on that year of watch...

That's because the box is a fake as well... not looking good..

crowncollection · 2 May 2018, 08:07 AM

Fakebox and fake watch

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

J_1964 · 2 May 2018, 02:19 PM

If it WERE Genuine, it could NOT be a 2004 Sub.

henrylee · 2 May 2018, 02:21 PM

Fake

michael067 · 2 May 2018, 03:20 PM

Txub · 3 May 2018, 08:35 AM

That box should be a dead giveaway!

nyyankees · 4 May 2018, 01:26 PM

The new maxicase and dial were not out in 2004. Fake IMHO

1 May 2018, 10:35 PM	#2
JayB "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: UK Watch: EXP, DJ, NF Posts: 710	Too good to be true? Yes it is Terrible pictures but looks like a poor fake to me __________________ In 1953 they used Rolex Oysters and oxygen on Everest. In 1978 they managed without the oxygen. Rolex Explorer -- Rolex Datejust -- Tudor North Flag -- Omega De Ville Trésor -- Tudor Black Bay GMT -- Omega Speedmaster Professional -- Tudor Black Bay Fifty Eight

1 May 2018, 10:46 PM	#8
JayB "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: UK Watch: EXP, DJ, NF Posts: 710	One detail I will give, the Serial number F437091 is a well known fake, always worth typing the number into Google as you never know what might come up __________________ In 1953 they used Rolex Oysters and oxygen on Everest. In 1978 they managed without the oxygen. Rolex Explorer -- Rolex Datejust -- Tudor North Flag -- Omega De Ville Trésor -- Tudor Black Bay GMT -- Omega Speedmaster Professional -- Tudor Black Bay Fifty Eight

2 May 2018, 01:05 AM	#11
GradyPhilpott 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: 116710 BLNR Posts: 34,353	Take a pass on that one. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

2 May 2018, 08:07 AM	#13
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,165	Fakebox and fake watch Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

2 May 2018, 02:19 PM	#14
J_1964 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Jim Location: NoCal USA Watch: 16710 Posts: 1,955	2004 would be a Five Digit? Lugs Too Thick? If it WERE Genuine, it could NOT be a 2004 Sub.

1 May 2018, 10:36 PM	#3
edweather "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: Georgia, USA Watch: Casio Illuminator Posts: 650	date not magnifying....fake

1 May 2018, 10:45 PM	#6
cwieb "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Location: U.S. Posts: 2,702	Not authentic.

1 May 2018, 10:53 PM	#9
rwsimbulan "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: toronto, ontario, Posts: 4	Wow ok thank you everyone

2 May 2018, 12:59 AM	#10
PRSWILL "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Minnesota Posts: 252	the box is also wrong on that year of watch...

2 May 2018, 02:21 PM	#15
henrylee "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Socal/LA Watch: 116610LN Ceramic Posts: 3,219	Fake __________________ ♛ Sub 116610LN 2011 ♛ GMT 126710BLNR 2021 ♛ GMT 126711CHNR 2020 ♛ Datejust 16233 X-series 1993 Ω Speedmaster Mitsukoshi 2019 č Cartier Tank w5200025 2021

2 May 2018, 03:20 PM	#16
michael067 Banned Join Date: Feb 2016 Real Name: Mike Location: Las Vegas Watch: TT DJ 16233 Posts: 1,002

3 May 2018, 08:35 AM	#17
Txub "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: San Francisco Posts: 16	That box should be a dead giveaway!

4 May 2018, 01:26 PM	#18
nyyankees "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southeastern PA Watch: 1216610 Posts: 2,131	The new maxicase and dial were not out in 2004. Fake IMHO

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)