ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 April 2009, 04:48 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
Daytona Clasp. New or Old?
How many of you daytona owners would prefer the new or old clasp and why?
Knowing how most people doesn't like changes in any Rolex models.(I love my old oyster clasp to bits). Are there any reason to pay extra $$$$ for the new clasp over the old one?
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
5 April 2009, 05:21 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Rick
Location: Wakanda
Watch: amacallit
Posts: 2,020
|
The new clasp is far more superior and is an engineering marvel! I ve it on my gmt and can say its a piece of art by itself.
|
5 April 2009, 05:40 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Posts: 148
|
I had the option of both. I chose the older one because it fit better and I personally thought it looked better.
I have been told by the AD and folks on this forum there is no difference in strength/durability/quality. So pick-um. I have had no regrets. |
5 April 2009, 06:28 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
|
doesn't matter to me as long as i get my daytona. have been told that my daytona (which is on the way since Jan 2009!) is the new clasp. can't wait till i get my hands on it.
|
5 April 2009, 09:55 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
I'm not too sure of getting a Daytona but I got the option of either the new or old clasp.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
5 April 2009, 10:00 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 27
|
Personally I prefer the old one. Tried the new one on the GMTIIC the other day at an AD and think that is quite a 'wow' design but the old one just fits my wrist better.
|
5 April 2009, 10:49 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: matt
Location: Denver
Posts: 608
|
|
7 April 2009, 07:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
I prefer the old clasp, and its a bit smaller in size.
|
7 April 2009, 08:15 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,135
|
The old clasp is a work of art..
It.... is the engineering marvel....... The new clasp is the same clasp design that you can find on the rest of the Rolex line-up, and will become the standard..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
7 April 2009, 08:16 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 125
|
Older clasp is better.
I've written this on other threads but the issue seems to keep coming up.
Older clasp is I feel is better if you can find it on a new SS Daytona. Z Daytonas are the oldest of the most recent series, then came M, and V started appearing in late 2008. The clasp is the only difference among these series. The bracelets are identical. The Zs come only with the older 78490 clasp. Early Ms had the older clasp and but some later M series Daytonas have the new 78590 clasp. We have also seen some of the most current V series with the older 78490 clasp and there are also Vs with the new clasp. Anyone care to speculate as to what Rolex is up to with the clasps on the Daytona? Seems like they can't make up their minds. At any rate, I own Rolex watches with both clasps and both are the the best clasps Rolex has ever made. But the 78490 is better -- especially on the Daytona. The older clasp on the Daytona (78490) feels more secure and robust but is also more elegant and simple. The inner folding elements are sculpted and tapered and polished unlike those in the newer clasp (78590) which have a very thin middle portion and fat edges. These same elements are nicely engraved on the wrist side on the older clasp and appear cheaply printed/scored on the newer clasp and face away from the wrist. When closed on the wrist, the older 78490 clasp is more comfortable and appears smaller and more proportional than the longer, bulkier 78590 found on the GMT II-C and newest Daytonas. The older clasp has a pressure fit round snap closure with no moving parts to fail. It closes/opens with an audible snap. Some complained that this design made it hard to open and is likely why the newer GMT II-C 78590 clasp with its spring-loaded mechanism to make it easier to open is now on the Daytona. Springs can fail and get lost. The older Daytona clasp is not hard to open. I've seen 4 year old do it. Both clasps have a "swing-out" or "flip-lock" adjustment feature, but neither have the "GLIDELOCK" mechanism found on the SDDS clasp. The hinge pin of the 78490 outer flip-lock goes all the way through and, while this makes the hinge pin visible if you look very closely, it also makes the hinge stronger. The 78590 has a hidden hinge pin. I believe the Rolex crown on the newer clasp is slightly larger/constructed differently and overhangs a bit. A lot of these differences in the clasps involve personal preference and almost everyone would agree that the differences are much much fewer than the similarities. It's hard to see why it would be worth paying about 10% more for the GMT II-C style clasp on a new Daytona when the older Daytona clasp is certainly as good and arguably better. However, you may soon have no choice as Rolex appears to be standardizing on the newer 78590 clasp which debuted on the GMT-II C. This might make the 78490 Daytona clasp something of a rarity in a short time. And one has to agree that it's more than a little disappointing that Rolex would give up the sturdier, higher-quality, and more elegant 78490 design just to standardize on the 78590 across (non-diving) sport models and lower their costs while, at the same time, RAISING the price to the customer. But in the end the two clasps aren't really so different. Only a WIS like the folks here would notice. Don't sweat it. Enjoy your 78590 if you have one or plan to buy one. It's a great clasp. I'm not saying I'd pay extra to swap a 78590 that I already owned for a 78490. Just saying the prospective buyer should know that the older 78490 is actually a bit better and costs less. Finally, watch out for ADs who try sell a new SS Daytona with the older 78490 clasp at the new higher price (which applies only to new SS Daytonas with the 78590 clasp). This is hopefully rare, but some forum members have reported some ADs attempting this and have gotten refunds for the price difference after confronting the AD about it. And make sure the part numbers on the Rolex warranty card match the parts on the watch you are buying. |
7 April 2009, 08:21 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: palm springs CA
Watch: Plat.118296DayDate
Posts: 192
|
pleaese someone post some good pics of the clasps, also is the newer style clasp the same on the daytona / president and datejust they all apear similar to me altho i havent had them all right next to each other at the same time.
|
7 April 2009, 08:30 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Fullerton, CA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 916
|
i like the older clasp as well very unique and not common amongst the pro line. I personally like the way the older clasp felt.
|
7 April 2009, 01:22 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
PalmSpringsCaVault, there is a search function on this forum for pictures of Daytona clasps. But someone, please post some nice pics of the new and old Daytona clasps for comparison in this thread please!!
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
7 April 2009, 01:28 PM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 DATE-JUST41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,135
|
Check the Daytona stuff in the Reference Library..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
7 April 2009, 01:42 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
Larry I already did. Great posts.
Particularly the comparison between Speedmaster and Daytona which is my favourite Here is the link. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=40615 And the report on Daytona itself. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=33564 I can only wish there are more writings like these.
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
7 April 2009, 02:05 PM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Man. Bch., CA USA
Watch: SS-P YM
Posts: 679
|
I have the new GMTIIC clasp and an M class Daytona with the "hole" in the clasp (ie, older model).
At first I thought the Daytona clasp would be a better fit since the exterior clasp is shorter. However, the underlying "wing" seems like it is the same length as the GMTII "wing." Therefore, I can't say for certain if one is more comfortable than the other. They both feel the same to me. The Daytona is a lighter watch, I think, so its an easier wearing watch. I love them both so it makes no difference to me. If there is a $500 difference in price between the new clasp and old clasp on the Daytona its a no brainer for me, after all, Old Guys Rule! |
7 April 2009, 08:40 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 328
|
i purposely chose the older clasp based on the info provided in the forum as well as by sellers
|
15 February 2020, 11:40 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
|
Old thread, but new question (at least for me).
Does the old style clasp have the easylink extension as well?
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation |
15 February 2020, 12:57 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco
Watch: ✓
Posts: 69
|
I prefer the older clasp if it’s steel and newer clasp if it’s PM. The older one is lighter and more comfortable. The newer clasp in PM gives you more PM and sounds better when it snaps.
|
18 February 2020, 12:27 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex/AP
Posts: 341
|
Prefer the newer clasp. Feels more solid, and more heft, especially on PM model. The SS feels too light to begin with.
|
30 April 2020, 06:15 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 1
|
I'm not sure if this is the best way to do this but i am interested in buying the new daytona 116500LN clasp for a steel model.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.