ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

SoSideCubsFan · 9 November 2008, 02:28 PM

Opinions, comments please..... 1954 6294?
What can you tell me about this one?

Thanks!

tudorman8276 · 11 November 2008, 02:37 AM

...looks good except that the dial may be a refi.

...these dials usually had an actual little metal crown on the dial.

...other than that, looks okay.

Stan.

Terry Newton · 11 November 2008, 01:38 PM

What's the problem around the cyclops? Looks like glue.

Terry Newton

Kiplandis · 6 March 2009, 03:06 PM

I just bought one--same vintage--without cyclops. Is my crystal original?

idk01 · 6 March 2009, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry Newton

What's the problem around the cyclops? Looks like glue.

Terry Newton

Looks like most of the crystal had a recent polished to remove scratches and they have missed around the cyclops, might be a home job polish, aren't the crystals on these acrylic/plastic?

11 November 2008, 02:37 AM	#2
tudorman8276 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: STAN Location: KY-USA Watch: Rolex Prez Posts: 12,584	...mmmmmmmm..... ...looks good except that the dial may be a refi. ...these dials usually had an actual little metal crown on the dial. ...other than that, looks okay. Stan.

11 November 2008, 01:38 PM	#3
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	What's the problem around the cyclops? Looks like glue. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

6 March 2009, 03:06 PM	#4
Kiplandis "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: California Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 1	I just bought one--same vintage--without cyclops. Is my crystal original?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)