![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Poll | |||
Yes, I would prefer a SUB/GMT at 38.5mm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
105 | 39.03% |
No, I prefer the current size of the SUB/GMT |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
164 | 60.97% |
Voters: 269. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,141
|
Quote:
Agreed. I think the question better answered would be a 38.5mm (i.e. 39) option in addition to the 41mm. I had to sell my 6 digit Sub because it was just too big for my svelte wrists.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
Nope.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. ![]() ![]() ![]() SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.