ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 June 2009, 08:06 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
Photographic technique advice
I've been trying to do a "drive by shooting" shot to achieve a " visual tunneling effect". See test shot here - 13 seconds, F/5.6, on a 28mm prime lens, ISO200, Nikon D90:
Problem is I want the outside light streaks to be more focused and straighter. I was driving at like 80kmph on the freeway when I took this shot (using remote control). I also want the inside of the car to be focused without blur, as well as, if possible a clear focus on the car in front. Any ideas how I can achieve it? Should I change th lens to like 12mm to get inherent deep DOF? |
18 June 2009, 02:26 PM | #2 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,519
|
Quote:
Good luck. Jocke
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
|
18 June 2009, 03:16 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
|
Vibration reduction and shoot with the mirror up and it may get the affect that you want.
|
18 June 2009, 03:31 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: GMTIIC
Posts: 605
|
The squiggly lines outside are that way because of the vibration of the moving car. Not much you can do about that, VR lenses might help a bit, but I don't think they will make the lines straight. IMO it's kind of nice the way it is.
__________________
116234 | 116710 | OMEGA 2551.80 | Reverso GMT |
18 June 2009, 06:55 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,409
|
Dee said it looks great I reckon you need to find a smoother road , vibration is always going to be the issue.
|
18 June 2009, 09:14 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
Thanks guys. I reshooted this evening using 5s exposure, F/16, 14mm lens, ISO200. The streaks look much more finer this time.
Yes, I need to wash the car |
18 June 2009, 10:49 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
Surprised no one said to go faster. The faster you drive, the shorter you can make the shutter while still getting the streaks.
|
18 June 2009, 11:19 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Dave
Location: England.
Watch: Various
Posts: 7,305
|
Quote:
Are those two little space invaders at the very top of the photo.
__________________
KINDEST REGARDS DAVE |
|
19 June 2009, 12:05 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
I was already at 100kmph which is the speed limit. Any higher will attract the cops and who knows what they will say, seeing a camera rig in the middle of the car
|
19 June 2009, 12:26 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
|
Quote:
I would make sure that the speed was about twice the amount of the aperture. Bump the ISO up and still do the mirror lock-up. Too bad there are free tunnels around here or I would test it out myself. |
|
19 June 2009, 09:47 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
It's on full manual. I underexposed by 1.7 f/stops, I didn't want the dirty windows to show up
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.