ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 July 2023, 11:51 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 463
|
An old dog and a new trick...
Subs and Sea Dwellers have always been my favorite models...
And for the last 40 plus years I have worn almost nothing else... But since purchasing my Explorer some two and a half years ago, I hardly wear them anymore... I never thought I'd see the day... IMG_9885.JPG |
9 July 2023, 11:55 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: JC
Location: Korea
Posts: 451
|
Out of curiosity, why do you think that is? Why you prefer the Explorer over the SD or Sub.
|
10 July 2023, 12:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Global in 1C
Watch: 1675
Posts: 449
|
Explorer looks good = under the radar
__________________
1675, 14060M, 16600, 16610, 16610LV, 16622, 16700LN, 116520 |
10 July 2023, 12:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,742
|
|
10 July 2023, 12:20 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 74,427
|
Definitely could be a one and done. Comfortable, lightweight, easy on the eyes
|
10 July 2023, 12:21 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
I still love my 16600 and my 14060m and have no intension of selling them... Increasingly though, the old adage of "Less is More" seems to be appealing to me to a greater degree... The overall size of the Explorer, the simplicity and understated nature of the piece just works so well... Maybe its just old age creeping in... |
|
10 July 2023, 12:30 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,167
|
x1 is amazing. Absolutely amazing. Simple. Elegant. Minimalist.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 July 2023, 12:43 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 2,954
|
I’ve been defaulting to my Explorer so often it has me questioning whether I need to own as many watches as I do. The Explorer disappears on the wrist and the dial reads easy without glasses. I hike daily in fair weather and the Explorer is my go to. No doubt when winter rolls around again I’ll be glad I have other watch options but when I’m wearing shorts I’m almost always wearing the Explorer.
|
10 July 2023, 12:52 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 2,979
|
The Explorer is a classic looking watch and one that never looks dated
|
10 July 2023, 01:13 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 224
|
The Explorer is more low profile, lighter, and wears more comfortably to me. I should have never traded my 214270.
|
10 July 2023, 02:46 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 10,715
|
Not as busy as the ceramic bezels are on the divers.
|
10 July 2023, 05:26 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Mont Boron
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 192
|
I've never seen an Explorer that I didn't like. In my opinion, even the two-tone version looks good, although I prefer the stainless steel models.
Rolex makes and has made many wonderful watches, but the Explorer and the Submariner (especially the two-liner) have always been my two personal favorites.
__________________
"I give you the mausoleum of all hope and desire [...] not that you may remember time, but that you might forget it now and then..." |
10 July 2023, 07:28 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 957
|
Quote:
So OP do you just have the 5 digits references that you are comparing your wearing history with or do you also have some 6 digits? If the latter, I would suspect the overall size and balance of the Ex1 draws you in. The 6 digits look great imo but are top heavy. |
|
10 July 2023, 07:57 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 6,540
|
The Explorer is a classic for sure - could be a one and done...
|
10 July 2023, 08:19 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 377
|
Not sure about 2 1/2 years ago but definitely now. Have to watch what you’re wearing more. Gotta be it.
|
10 July 2023, 10:04 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 463
|
Quote:
I did not like the ceramic bezel, the maxi dial or the thicker lugs...The glide-lock bracelet was very nice but not as comfortable as the 93150 0r 93160 in my opinion... |
|
10 July 2023, 11:23 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Canada
Posts: 957
|
I can understand that. The 6-digits are not for everyone’s taste…or fit. The 214270 is certainly much closer in comfort to the older sub references and is also refreshingly more simplistic. I for one have never (and will never) need a rotating bezel or the extra 200m of water resistance. I’m a fan of the Ex1 also….all references.
|
10 July 2023, 11:30 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,036
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.