The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 March 2024, 05:59 PM   #61
gdubdj
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
I am starting to.love the look of the 36!
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg IMG_1143.jpeg (138.8 KB, 296 views)
gdubdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2024, 06:04 PM   #62
xrole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Cuckooclockland
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by gdubdj View Post
I am starting to.love the look of the 36!
For the love of the flying spaghetti monster please get your watch bracelet properly sized because it looks silly hanging off your wrist like that.
xrole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2024, 06:18 PM   #63
gdubdj
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrole View Post
For the love of the flying spaghetti monster please get your watch bracelet properly sized because it looks silly hanging off your wrist like that.
Bracelet service is in the works bud. Had this watch back less than a week…. But thanks.
gdubdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2024, 08:54 PM   #64
bibbi
"TRF" Member
 
bibbi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 635
Is Rolex Datejust 36 too small for a 7.5 inch wrist (19cm)

Can’t imagine a 36mm watch on a wrist larger than 17cm. Would look like borrowed from a child. Just like examples shown above look.

But it’s just my pov (16cm wrist).

bibbi
bibbi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2024, 09:32 PM   #65
DLRIDES
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by bibbi View Post
Can’t imagine a 36mm watch on a wrist larger than 17cm. Would look like borrowed from a child. Just like examples shown above look.

But it’s just my pov (16cm wrist).

bibbi

This
__________________
”When citizens learn to vote themselves the treasury, they limit prosperity.”
DLRIDES is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2024, 11:19 PM   #66
KatGirl
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
KatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: Northern Ca, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 5,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by bibbi View Post
Can’t imagine a 36mm watch on a wrist larger than 17cm. Would look like borrowed from a child. Just like examples shown above look.

But it’s just my pov (16cm wrist).

bibbi

So not true! No bad pics here! It’s all about perspective. If you’ve been wearing dinner plates on your own wrist, then 36 mm will seem small. It’s all about what you are used to wearing, and seeing. There was a period of time, quite recently, where oversized watches were in vogue. Thankfully, fashion trends changed, and a 36 mm watch is once again becoming a normal size for an average male wrist again. Guys who modeled your 36’s, for this thread, you all look great!

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
KatGirl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 02:07 AM   #67
bibbi
"TRF" Member
 
bibbi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Earth
Posts: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by KatGirl View Post
So not true! No bad pics here! It’s all about perspective. If you’ve been wearing dinner plates on your own wrist, then 36 mm will seem small. It’s all about what you are used to wearing, and seeing. There was a period of time, quite recently, where oversized watches were in vogue. Thankfully, fashion trends changed, and a 36 mm watch is once again becoming a normal size for an average male wrist again. Guys who modeled your 36’s, for this thread, you all look great!

Kat


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

We will gracefully reserve our differing standpoints. As I underlined, this is my point of view, not the ultimate truth, for sure.

I’m fully aware of the rightfully gone „dinner plates” fashion trend. I would say that nowadays the trend is more or less pretty neutral.

For my 16cm wirst, in my opinion, a 39mm diver, maybe a 40mm one, if properly deisgned, is a max I can pull up (smaller diameters in the case of non-tool watches). The bigger watches will look completely outplaced on my wrist. On the other end, there are days when (depending on my mood, my perspective) a 36mm OP seems to look smallish on me. But there exist people who would happily wear a 43-44mm watch on a 16cm wrist. Strange for me, not for them.

On the other hand I’m aware of all Stallones of this world with huge wrists compared to mine, wearing 36mm or maybe even 34mm watches. Do they break any rules? No. But in my humble opinion these watches look on their wrists similarly strange (comical) as a 44mm watch would look on my wrist.

Anyway, let’s hope for the reintroduction of a white dial to the 36mm OP in less than 2-weeks’ time.


bibbi
bibbi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 07:31 PM   #68
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatswhatshesaid View Post
I have a 7.5" wrist and my wife's 36mm DJ looks tiny on me.

The 41mm DJ is actually only a bit over 39mm and will fit you much better.
Agree with this
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 10:05 PM   #69
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,716
Is Rolex Datejust 36 too small for a 7.5 inch wrist (19cm)

For those folks who judge size based on pics posted here on TRF…. I’d caution you. These up close pics of a 36mm watch on a 7+ inch wrist, hanging down by the hand, will look disproportionately large vs looking at it 3 or 4 ft away in a mirror.

Certainly a 42mm SKD is too big on a 6 3/4 inch wrist …especially if you look at this pic..
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 10:15 PM   #70
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,716
Then a few feet away…. There’s a lot more that goes into Watch size versus wrist size… Body type, flatness of wrist, shape of your forearm, etc.…



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 10:49 PM   #71
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,259
Is Rolex Datejust 36 too small for a 7.5 inch wrist (19cm)

Here’s a picture of a 41 on 7.5” wrists from about 5 feet away. If I bought a 36 , I’d have some serious buyers remorse right now.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 11:17 PM   #72
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krash View Post
Here’s a picture of a 41 on 7.5” wrists from about 5 feet away. If I bought a 36 , I’d have some serious buyers remorse right now.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly my point…
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 11:17 PM   #73
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,655
I’ve had both, the DJ41 is actually a bit less than 41mm, and it looks fine on my 7.25” wrist, but no one ever refers to the 41 as a classic.

But…it’s not just about size, it’s about proportions, and the 36mm DJ has ideal proportions.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2024, 11:52 PM   #74
Krash
2024 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack T View Post
I’ve had both, the DJ41 is actually a bit less than 41mm, and it looks fine on my 7.25” wrist, but no one ever refers to the 41 as a classic.

But…it’s not just about size, it’s about proportions, and the 36mm DJ has ideal proportions.

Nobody refers the DJ41 as a classic because it’s relatively new. They didn’t make it back in 1945 when the DJ was released.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2024, 12:30 AM   #75
hartsy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: CO
Watch: Explorer 1 224270
Posts: 59
I would go for the 41. I am just a hair under 7in wrist and have a bigger more athletic build and personally found the 36 to be a little too small for my liking and opted for the 40 (224270) explorer
hartsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2024, 12:52 AM   #76
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krash View Post
Nobody refers the DJ41 as a classic because it’s relatively new. They didn’t make it back in 1945 when the DJ was released.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree, but Rolex moved off the 36mm only in response to the big watch fad of 10-12 years ago. First came the DJ II, a watch that was widely criticized for its clumsy proportions. Then came the DJ 41, much improved over the DJ II, but still a nod to the modern, larger case trend, and derivative in design.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 May 2024, 11:37 PM   #77
boa2
"TRF" Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: US
Watch: Me Now
Posts: 3,677
A 36mm DJ looks as fitting on my 7.5 inch wrist as a 44mm Luminor or AP RO Offshore. It happens to look better than the 41mm, and who would have guessed?

It depends on the model, the dial color, the metal, etc. The number isn’t the determining factor. How I think it looks on MY wrist is.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 01:13 PM   #78
JRique
"TRF" Member
 
JRique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmlovett1 View Post
Then a few feet away…. There’s a lot more that goes into Watch size versus wrist size… Body type, flatness of wrist, shape of your forearm, etc.…



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
Still incredible big for the wrist size.
JRique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 02:08 PM   #79
TheHulk
"TRF" Member
 
TheHulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Texas
Watch: Tonas
Posts: 994
I have a 7.5 and you couldn’t give me a 36 mm, waaaaayyy too small and feminine for me
TheHulk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 03:18 PM   #80
Bro Watch
"TRF" Member
 
Bro Watch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: US
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmlovett1 View Post
Then a few feet away…. There’s a lot more that goes into Watch size versus wrist size… Body type, flatness of wrist, shape of your forearm, etc.…



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
It looks perfect on you!

The 36MM watch is an ideal choice for individuals with slender wrists, such as my wife's. It provides an elegant and proportionate fit, ensuring both comfort and aesthetic appeal for people with smaller wrists.

Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk
Bro Watch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 05:02 PM   #81
Davidt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: U.K.
Posts: 92
It’s important to recognise that diameter isn’t the main measurement, lug to lug and imo dial diameter are much more important.

I’m 6’1”, nearly 17 stone and solidly built: I couldn’t wear a 36mm diver as with the bezel the dial is just too small and it looks like a child’s watch on my wrist. Same with a Chronograph, with the subdials the dial is very busy and it makes the watch appear smaller.
It’s entirely different with a time only watch like an Explorer or DJ. With no large bezel or complications on the dial, the dial is a large expanse of negative space and it makes the watch appear very large, comically so imo.

Compare the dial on a 41mm Sub and a 41mm DJ. The dial in the DJ is significantly larger making is wear larger on the wrist and seeming out of proportion. Conversely, the dial on a 36mm DJ is about the same diameter as a Sub/GMT.
Personally, if a sub is a good fit for you, I think a DJ 36 should be. If however, you wear a 44-48mm diver, I can see why you’d want a DJ41.
Davidt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 08:05 PM   #82
rmlovett1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
rmlovett1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 22,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRique View Post
Still incredible big for the wrist size.
As has been said….everyone has their opinion on this subject and you’re welcome to it. An individual’s opinion is just that, an opinion….arguably can be right or wrong. But in the most general terms….in looking at whether a watch fits, (basic rules) if the lugs don’t hang off the sides of your wrist, it fits.
But today’s rules are different… Basically anything goes, to each their own, etc…if you enjoy wearing it and you think it looks good…then so be it! All good!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Watch View Post
It looks perfect on you!

The 36MM watch is an ideal choice for individuals with slender wrists, such as my wife's. It provides an elegant and proportionate fit, ensuring both comfort and aesthetic appeal for people with smaller wrists.

Sent from my SM-S911U1 using Tapatalk
I appreciate it, thank you. I agree with your assessment about the 36 mm.
rmlovett1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 08:15 PM   #83
aboutime
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Australia
Posts: 39
I feel sizing is down to personal perception and what are you used to seeing on your wrist. I’ve been wearing 40mm mostly and when I tried on a DJ36mm it just looked way too small. And I have a 16.5cm wrist. As said by another member, after a period of wearing, it just becomes quite natural.
aboutime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 08:20 PM   #84
MSL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: UK
Watch: 124270,15010,P39
Posts: 122
The advantage of 36s is that thay have reduced dead spaace so look more complete
MSL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 09:10 PM   #85
alphadweller
"TRF" Member
 
alphadweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 5,974
I'd personally go for the 41mm, I've got 7.2in wrists. I tried the 36mm, seemed too small to me. The 41mm is not even a true 41, it's actually smaller.
alphadweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 10:55 PM   #86
Rolex1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rolex1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Ron the Stoic
Location: Netherlands
Watch: GMT Meteorite
Posts: 1,243
I told my AD last week that I’m thinking of buying a platinum daydate and have some doubts if 36 isn’t to small. He got a 36 datejust to try on and it actually looks great. He didn’t have a daydate at that location but the size of the datejust was fine.
Rolex1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 10:56 PM   #87
BigJim67
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: NY
Posts: 23
Been wearing 42, 41 and 38mm Omegas on my 7.5" wrist for a long time, tried on a few 36mm over the past few months. Borrowed a buddys old 36mm DJ for a day, at first it seemed tiny, but I got used to it and it was fine..
BigJim67 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 11:03 PM   #88
worldofoyster
"TRF" Member
 
worldofoyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vincent
Location: 215
Watch: SS Sub
Posts: 1,902
36mm is classic
worldofoyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2024, 11:10 PM   #89
chazadams
"TRF" Member
 
chazadams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Beach
Watch: Submariner / GMT
Posts: 493
I do not think a 36mm watch wears too small and looks terrific on most wrists!

Have you looked at the previous generation 39mm Oyster Perpetual? That watch is a terrific size and wears beautifully. A white or black dial configuration is a great add to any collection and could actually be a one and done watch......well not, here in this forum but you know what I mean....
chazadams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2024, 01:20 AM   #90
FrançoisCzapek
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Singapore
Watch: Classic Pateks
Posts: 200
I think so but it ultimately depends on the wearer.

I have a 7 3/4 wrist and a 37/38 is visibly small while 39-41 is a sweet spot. But I consciously wear 37 mm watches anyway, but I'm aware they do look small.
FrançoisCzapek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

OCWatches

DavidSW Watches

Wrist Aficionado

Bernard Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.